Abstract

The aerodynamic impact of hub gap leakage on the performance characteristics of an axial compressor rotor in conventional design (no blisk) with a high hub-to-tip ratio has been investigated using three-dimensional steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations. The inclusion of circumferential hub gaps in front of the leading edge and after the trailing edge, as well as inter-platform leakage, reduced the total pressure ratio and the polytropic efficiency of the rotor by as much as 3.74% and 3.97%, respectively, compared to a design case with clean endwalls. Potential design recommendations in terms of improved aerodynamic robustness against leakage effects were derived from the separate sealing of each hub gap. Six geometry modifications were assessed, which based on these results. In a throttled operating condition, large edge radii in the front gap on the disk and platform partially recovered the initial losses of both the total pressure ratio (17.7%) and polytropic efficiency (19.6%). A circular lateral platform shape with the opening pointing toward the blade’s pressure side showed superior loss recovery capabilities at a dethrottled operating point. The combination of both features did not reduce the losses further. However, the circular lateral platform shape combined with smaller front gap chamfers proved more beneficial in a throttled state.

References

1.
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Celestina
,
M. L.
,
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
, and
Strazisar
,
A. J.
,
1997
, “
The Effect of Hub Leakage Flow on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors
,”
Proceedings of the ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition
,
Orlando, FL
,
Paper No. 97-GT-346
.
2.
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Park
,
G.
, and
Shahpar
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Leakage Uncertainties in Compressors: The Case of Rotor 37
,”
AIAA J. Propuls. Power
,
31
(
1
), pp.
1
11
.
3.
Wolf
,
H.
,
Franke
,
M.
,
Halcoussis
,
A.
,
Kleinclaus
,
C.
, and
Gautier
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of Penny Leakage Flows of Variable Guide Vanes in High Pressure Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Seoul, South Korea
,
Paper No. GT2016-56327
.
4.
Stummann
,
S.
,
Pohl
,
D.
,
Jeschke
,
P.
,
Wolf
,
H.
,
Halcoussis
,
A.
, and
Franke
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Secondary Flow in Variable Stator Guide Vanes With Penny-Cavities
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Charlotte, NC, USA
,
Paper No. GT2017-63771
.
5.
Heidegger
,
N. J.
,
Hall
,
E. J.
, and
Delaney
,
R. A.
,
1996
, Aeropropulsion Technology (APT) Task 23—Stator Seal Cavity Flow Investigation. NASA CR-198504.
6.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
1998
, “
The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance
,”
Proceedings of the ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition
,
Stockholm, Sweden
,
Paper No. 98-GT-12
.
7.
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
,
2000
, “
The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Munich, Germany
,
Paper No. 2000-GT-570
.
8.
Taylor
,
D. J.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
,
2019
, “
Effects of Stator Platform Geometry Features on Blade Row Performance
,”
J. Glob. Power Propuls. Soc.
,
3
, pp.
609
629
.
9.
Petermann
,
J.
,
Pommerening
,
M.
,
Becker
,
B.
, and
Gümmer
,
V.
,
2022
, “
Numerical Analysis of Blade Platform Leakage in Axial Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Paper No. GT2022-78443
.
10.
Petermann
,
J.
,
Becker
,
B.
, and
Gümmer
,
V.
,
2022
, “
Platform Leakage and Blade Tilting in Axial Compressor CFD-Simulations
,”
Proceedings of the International Society for Air Breathing Engines
,
Ottawa, Canada
,
Paper No. ISABE-2022-216
.
11.
Lapworth
,
B. L.
,
2004
, “
HYDRA-CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development
,”
International Conference on Scientific & Engineering Computation (IC-SEC)
,
Singapore
.
12.
Moinier
,
P.
,
Müller
,
J.-D.
, and
Giles
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Edge-Based Multigrid and Preconditioning for Hybrid Grids
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
(
10
), pp.
1954
1960
.
13.
Martinelli
,
L.
,
1987
, “
Calculations of Viscous Flows With a Multigrid Method
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Princeton University
,
Princeton, NJ
.
14.
Müller
,
J.-D.
, and
Giles
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Edge-Based Multigrid Schemes for Hybrid Grids
,”
Proceedings of the 6th ICFD Conference on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Oxford, UK
.
15.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
16.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
Kuntz
,
M.
, and
Langtry
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model
,”
J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
4
, pp.
625
632
.
You do not currently have access to this content.