This paper presents a comprehensive study of the effect of shroud design in axial turbine aerodynamics. Experimental measurements and numerical simulations have been conducted on three different test cases with identical blade geometry and tip clearances but different shroud designs. The first and second test cases are representative of a full shroud and a nonaxisymmetric partial shroud geometry while the third test case uses an optimized partial shroud. Partial shrouds are sometimes used in industrial application in order to benefit from the advantage of shrouded configuration, as well as reduce mechanical stress on the blades. However, the optimal compromise between mechanical considerations and aerodynamic performances is still an open issue due to the resulting highly three-dimensional unsteady flow field. Aerodynamic performance is measured in a low-speed axial turbine facility and shows that there are clear differences between the test cases. In addition, steady and time resolved measurements are performed together with computational analysis in order to improve the understanding of the effect of the shroud geometry on the flow field and to quantify the sources of the resultant additional losses. The flow field analysis shows that the effect of the shroud geometry is significant from 60% blade height span to the tip. Tip leakage vortex in the first rotor is originated in the partial shroud test cases while the full shroud case presents only a weak indigenous tip passage vortex. This results in a significant difference in the secondary flow development in the following second stator with associated losses that varies by about 1% in this row. The analysis shows that the modified partial shroud design has improved considerably the aerodynamic efficiency by about 0.6% by keeping almost unchanged the overall weight of this component, and thus blade root stresses. The work, therefore, presents a comprehensive flow field analysis and shows the impact of the shroud geometry in the aerodynamic performance.

1.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
2.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Brouillet
,
B.
, and
De Vito
,
L.
, 2005, “
Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
649
658
.
3.
Peters
,
P.
,
Menter
,
J. R.
,
Pfost
,
H.
,
Giboni
,
A.
, and
Wolter
,
K.
, 2005 “
Unsteady Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Flow and Downstream Stator Flow in a Shrouded 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2005-GT-68065.
4.
Patel
,
K. V.
, 1908, “
Research on a High Work Axial Gas Generator Turbine
,” SAE Report No. 800618.
5.
Yaras
,
M. I.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 1991, “
Measurements of the Effect of Winglets on Tip-Leakage Losses in a Linear Turbine Cascade
,” ISABE Report No. 91-7011, pp.
127
135
.
6.
Harvery
,
N. W.
, and
Ramsden
,
K.
, 2000, “
A Computational Study of a Novel Turbine Rotor Partial Shroud
,” ASME Paper No. GT2000-668.
7.
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Newmann
,
D. A.
,
Haselbach
,
F.
, and
Willer
,
L.
, 2006,
“An Investigation Into a Novel Turbine Rotor Winglet—Part 1: Design and Model Rig Test results
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90456.
8.
Nirmalan
,
N. V.
, and
Bailey
,
J. C.
, 2005, “
Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamic Losses of Different Shapes of a Shrouded Blade Tip Section
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68903.
9.
Porreca
,
L.
,
Behr
,
T.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Ehrhard
,
J.
, and
Janke
,
E.
, 2005, “
Fluid Dynamics and Performance of Partially and Fully Shrouded Axial Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
668
678
.
10.
Porreca
,
L.
,
Hollenstein
,
M.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2007, “
Turbulence Measurements and Analysis in a Multistage Axial Turbine
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
23
(
1
), pp.
227
234
.
11.
Treiber
,
M.
,
Kupferschmied
,
P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 1998, “
Analysis of the Error Propagation Arising From the Measurements With a Miniature Pneumatic 5-Hole Probe
,” 14th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascade and Turbomachines.
12.
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Denton
,
J.
, 2006, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Loss by Reducing Circumferential Mixing
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90949.
13.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, 2001, “
The Control of Shrouded Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
334
341
.
14.
Behr
,
T.
,
Porreca
,
L.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2004, “
Multistage Aspects and Unsteady Effects of Stator and Rotor Clocking in an Axial Turbine with Low Aspect Ratio Blading
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
11
22
.
15.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2005, “
Vortex-Wake-Blade Interaction in a Shrouded Axial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
699
707
.
16.
Yun
,
Y. I.
,
Porreca
,
L.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Song
,
S. J.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2006, “
Investigation of 3D Unsteady Flows in a Two Stages Shrouded Axial Turbine Using Stereoscopic PIV and FRAP—Part II: Kinematics of Shroud Cavity Flow
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-91020.
17.
Pfau
,
A
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Labyrinth Seals of Shrouded Axial Turbines
,” ETH Ph.D. thesis, ETH, Zurich.
You do not currently have access to this content.