The influence of material anisotropy and friction on ring deformation has been examined in relation to the distribution of normal pressure and frictional shear stress, deformed ring shapes, and estimated errors in the coefficient of friction. Based on the flow rule associated with von Mises’ and Hill’s yield criteria, the analyses have been carried out with the finite element method (FEM) for three cases, namely, (1) an anisotropic ring oriented 90 deg to the axis of rotational symmetrical anisotropy under uniform coefficient of friction; (2) an isotropic ring under frictional anisotropy condition; and (3) an anisotropic ring oriented 0 deg to the axis of rotational symmetrical anisotropy under uniform coefficient of friction. In the first two cases, the results show that the influence of anisotropy on ring deformation is quite similar to that obtained by changing the frictional condition. Therefore, in the third case, if the anisotropic behavior is mistakenly attributed to friction, the possible estimated error for the coefficient of friction can be as high as 80 percent for a pronounced anisotropic material. Deformed ring shapes have been verified in experiments using the extruded annealed aluminum alloy AA6082 (Al-Si1Mg0.9Mn0.1).

1.
Kunogi
,
M.
,
1956
, “
A New Method of Cold Extrusion
,”
Journal of the Scientific Research Institute
,
50
, pp.
215
246
.
2.
Male
,
A. T.
et al.
,
1964
, “
Coefficient of Friction Under Condition of Bulk Plastic Deformation
,”
J. Inst. Met.
,
93
, pp.
38
46
.
3.
Garmong
,
G.
et al.
,
1977
, “
An Evaluation of the Ring Test for Strain-Rate-Sensitive Materials
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
8A
, pp.
2026
2027
.
4.
Danckert
,
J.
,
1988
, “
Analysis of the Ring Test Method for the Evaluation of Frictional Stresses in Bulk Metal Forming Processes
,”
Annals of the CIRP
,
37
(
1
), pp.
217
220
.
5.
Tan
,
X.
,
Martin
,
P. A. F.
,
Bay
,
N.
, and
Zhang
,
W.
,
1998
, “
Friction Studies at Different Normal Pressures With Alternative Ring-Compression Tests
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
80–81
, pp.
292
297
.
6.
Edward, M. M., 1991, Metal Working Science and Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
7.
Bhattacharyya
,
D.
,
1981
, “
Influence of Specimen Orientation on the Deformation of Rings
,”
Annals of the CIRP
,
30
(
1
), pp.
139
142
.
8.
Po¨hlandt
,
K.
, et al.
,
1998
, “
Concepts and Experiments for Characterizing Plastic Anisotropy of Round Bars, Wires, and Tubes
,”
Steel Res.
,
69
, pp.
171
174
.
9.
Hill, R., 1985, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press, New York.
10.
Honeycombe, R. W. K., 1984, The Plastic Deformation of Metals, Edward Arnold Ltd.
11.
Wagoner, R. H., and Chenot, J. L., 1996, Fundamentals of Metal Forming, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12.
Hill
,
R.
,
1948
, “
A Theory of the Yielding and Plastic Flow of Anisotropic Metals
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
193
, pp.
281
297
.
13.
Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, 1997, ABAQUS, Ver. 5.6.
14.
Cirsfield, M. A., 1997, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15.
MNC handbook nr 12, 1983, Aluminum Konstruktions-och materialla¨ra, Minab/Gotab, Kunga¨lv.
16.
Carlsson, B., 1996, “Determination and Modeling of Anisotropy With Special Focus on Flat Rolling of Wire,” Doctoral thesis, Kungliga Teknisa Ho¨gskolan, Stockholm.
17.
Ettouney
,
O. M.
et al.
,
1990
, “
An Approximate Model to Calculate Foldover and Strains During Cold Upsetting of Cylinders
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
,
112
, pp.
267
271
.
You do not currently have access to this content.