This paper presents an elastic-plastic asperity microcontact model for contact between two nominally flat surfaces. The transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow of the contacting asperity is modeled based on contact-mechanics theories in conjunction with the continuity and smoothness of variables across different modes of deformation. The relations of the mean contact pressure and contact area of the asperity to its contact interference in the elastoplastic regime of deformation are respectively modeled by logarithmic and fourth-order polynomial functions. These asperity-scale equations are then used to develop the elastic-plastic contact model between two rough surfaces, allowing the mean surface separation and the real area of contact to be calculated as functions of the contact load and surface plasticity index. Results are presented for a wide range of contact load and plasticity index, showing the importance of accurately modeling the deformation in the elastoplastic transitional regime of the asperity contacts. The results are also compared with those calculated by the GW and CEB models, showing that the present model is more complete in describing the contact of rough surfaces. [S0742-4787(00)01201-7]

1.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surface
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
295
, pp.
300
319
.
2.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Tripp
,
J. H.
,
1967
, “
The Elastic Contact of Rough Spheres
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
34
, pp.
153
159
.
3.
Hisakado
,
T.
,
1974
, “
Effects of Surface Roughness on Contact between Solid Surfaces
,”
Wear
,
28
, pp.
217
234
.
4.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Tripp
,
J. H.
,
1970
–1971, “
The Contact of Two Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
185
, pp.
625
633
.
5.
Bush
,
A. W.
,
Gibson
,
R. D.
, and
Thomas
,
T. R.
,
1975
, “
The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface
,”
Wear
,
35
, pp.
87
111
.
6.
Bush
,
A. W.
,
Gibson
,
R. D.
, and
Keogh
,
G. P.
,
1979
, “
Strong Anisotropic Rough Surface
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
101
, pp.
15
20
.
7.
McCool
,
J. I.
,
1986
, “
Comparison of Models for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
,
107
, pp.
37
60
.
8.
Powierza
,
Z. H.
,
Klimczak
,
T.
, and
Polijanniuk
,
A.
,
1992
, “
On the Experimental Verification of the Greenwood-Williamson Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
,
154
, pp.
115
124
.
9.
Abbott
,
E. J.
, and
Firestone
,
F. A.
,
1933
, “
Specifying Surface Quality—A Method Based on Accurate Measurement and Comparison
,”
Mech. Eng.
,
55
, p.
569
569
.
10.
Pullen
,
J.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1972
, “
On the Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
327
, pp.
159
173
.
11.
Chang
,
W. R.
,
Etsion
,
I.
, and
Bogy
,
D. B.
,
1987
, “
An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
109
, pp.
263
263
.
12.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13.
Horng
,
Jeng Haur
,
1998
, “
An Elliptic Elastic-Plastic Asperity Microcontact Model for Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
120
, pp.
82
88
.
14.
Kucharski
,
S.
,
Klimczak
,
T.
,
Palijaniuk
,
J.
, and
Kaczmarek
,
J.
,
1994
, “
Finite-Element Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
,
177
, pp.
1
13
.
15.
McCool
,
J. I.
,
1986
, “
Predicting Microfracture in Ceramics via a Microcontact Model
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
, pp.
380
386
.
16.
Timoshonko, S., and Goodier, J. N., 1951, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York.
17.
Tabor, D., 1951, The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University Press.
18.
Francis
,
H. A.
,
1976
, “
Phenomenological Analysis of Plastic Spherical Indentation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
, July, pp.
272
281
.
19.
Nuri
,
K. A.
, and
Halling
,
J.
,
1975
, “
The Normal Approach between Rough Flat Surfaces in Contact
,”
Wear
,
32
, pp.
81
93
.
You do not currently have access to this content.