Abstract

Process yield has been the most common criterion used in the manufacturing industry for measuring process performance. In many industrial applications, processes often have multiple characteristics with various specifications. The generated yield index CpkT establishes the relationship between the manufacturing specifications and the actual process performance, which provides a lower bound on process yield. In this paper, the explicated formula of the lower confidence bound is derived, and then the lower confidence bound for various values of α-risk, capability requirements, and sample sizes are calculated via the use of R programs. The lower confidence bound is essential to product reliability assurance and is important in the hypothesis testing of process capability. We not only provide some reliable lower confidence bound tables but also develop a simple and practical procedure for engineers. The practitioners can use the proposed procedure to determine whether their process meets the preset capability requirement and to make reliable decisions.

References

1.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Chen
,
K. S.
, “
A Practical Implementation of the Process Capability Index Cpk
,”
Qual. Eng.
, Vol.
9
, No.
4
,
1997
, pp.
721
737
. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119708919094
2.
Chen
,
S. M.
, and
Pearn
,
W. L.
, “
The Asymptotic Distribution of the Estimated Process Capability Index Cpk
,”
Commun. Stat.: Theory Meth.
, Vol.
26
, No.
10
,
1997
, pp.
2489
2497
. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929708832073
3.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Chen
,
K. S.
, “
Making Decisions in Assessing Process Capability Index Cpk
,”
Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int.
, Vol.
15
, No.
4
,
1999
, pp.
321
326
. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199907/08)15:4<321::AID-QRE258>3.0.CO;2-5
4.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Shu
,
M. H.
, “
Manufacturing Capability Control for Multiple Power-distribution Switch Processes Based on Modified Cpk MPPAC
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
, Vol.
43
, No.
6
,
2003
, pp.
963
975
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00096-9
5.
Pearn
,
W. L.
and
Wu
,
C. W.
, “
An Effective Modern Approach for Measuring High-tech Product Manufacturing Process Quality
,”
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers
, Vol.
22
, No.
2
,
2005
, pp.
119
133
. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660509509283
6.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Liao
,
M. Y.
, “
Measuring Process Capability Based on Cpk with Gauge Measurement Errors
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
, Vol.
45
, No.
3–4
,
2005
, pp.
739
751
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2004.09.005
7.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Wu
,
C. W.
, “
Process Capability Assessment for Index Cpk Based on Bayesian Approach
,”
Metrika
, Vol.
61
, No.
2
,
2005
, pp.
221
234
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001840400333
8.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Wu
,
C. W.
, “
Production Quality and Yield Assurance for Process with Multiple Independent Characteristics
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
, Vol.
173
, No.
2
,
2006
, pp.
637
647
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.050
9.
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Wu
,
C. W.
, “
An Effective Decision Making Method for Product Acceptance
,”
Omega
, Vol.
35
, No.
1
,
2007
, pp.
12
21
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018
10.
Pearn
,
W. L.
,
Chang
,
Y. C.
, and
Wu
,
C. W.
, “
Quality-yield Measure for Production Processes with Very Low Fraction Defective
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, Vol.
42
, No.
23
,
2004
, pp.
4909
4925
. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540410001699417
11.
Pearn
,
W. L.
,
Tai
,
Y. T.
, and
Chiang
,
W. L.
, “
Measuring Manufacturing Yield for Gold Bumping Processes under Dynamic Variance Change
,”
IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf.
, Vol.
33
, No.
2
,
2010
, pp.
77
83
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEPM.2009.2038994
12.
Pearn
,
W. L.
,
Tai
,
Y. T.
,
Huang
,
K. B.
, and
Ku
,
P. L.
, “
Accessing Manufacturing Yield for Gamma Wafer Sawing Processes in COG Packaging
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol., Part A
, Vol.
1
, No.
8
,
2011
, pp.
1282
1291
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCPMT.2011.2134853
13.
Wu
,
C. W.
,
Shu
,
M. H.
,
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Liu
,
K. H.
, “
Bootstrap Approach for Supplier Selection Based on Production Yield
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, Vol.
46
, No.
18
,
2008
, pp.
5211
5230
. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701278414
14.
Hsu
,
Y. C.
,
Pearn
,
W. L.
, and
Wu
,
P. C.
, “
Capability Adjustment for Gamma Process with Mean Shift Consideration in Implementing Six Sigma Program
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
, Vol.
191
, No.
2
,
2008
, pp.
517
529
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.023
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.