Abstract

One of the challenges to the implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) comes from calibrating the transfer functions. This paper focuses on calibration of one of the major distress models in flexible pavement: permanent deformation or rutting. Two key aspects are critical to a successful rutting model calibration: data and method. Regarding the data, existing in-field information only provides total rut depth, which could not meet the requirement of permanent deformation in each structural layer by the MEPDG. Concerning the method, existing work either fails to address calibration factors from a holistic perspective by only focusing on individual sections separately or ignores variability inherent in those factors. In this study, layer-wise permanent deformation from instrumented pavement under accelerated pavement testing serves to accommodate the models calibration. A systematic calibration procedure is established, which globally optimizes all available information across all test sections. Through simulation and numerical optimization, optimal calibration shift factors for three typical flexible pavement materials, asphalt mixture, unbound granular base, and finegrain soil are obtained as 0.60, 0.49, and 0.84, respectively. This implies that the uncalibrated MEPDG is biased toward overprediction of rut depth. It is further suggested that a more rational result for each calibrated factor is to introduce an appropriate distribution to characterize its uncaptured variability. In addition, a case study involving using calibrated MEPDG to predict pavement performance or life indicates that (1) model calibration has a significant impact on the prediction and (2) the “fourth power law” is supported by the MEPDG.

References

1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO).
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures
, Washington, DC,
1993
.
2.
NCHRP 1-37A “
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures
.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board,
2004
.
3.
Von Quintus
,
H. L.
,
Darter
,
M. I.
, and
Mallela
,
J.
, “
Local Calibration Guidance for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures
,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program 1-40B, draft, April,
2007
.
4.
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), “
Long-Term Pavement Performance Information Management System Pavement Performance Database User Guide
,” Report No. FHWA-RD-03-088, U.S. Department of Transportation,
2003
.
5.
Timm
,
D.
,
West
,
R.
,
Priest
,
A.
,
Powell
,
B.
,
Selvaraj
,
I.
,
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Brown
,
R.
, “
Phase II NCAT Test Track Results
,” National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) Report 06-05, Auburn University,
2006
.
6.
Ali
,
H. A.
,
Tayabji
,
S. D.
, and
Torre
,
F. L.
, “
Calibration of Mechanistic-Empirical Rutting Model for in Service Pavements
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
 0361-1981, Vol.
1629
,
1998
, pp.
159
168
.
7.
Salama
,
H. K.
,
Chatti
,
K.
, and
Haider
,
S. W.
, “
Calibration of Mechanistic-Empirical Model Using In-Service Pavement Data from the SPS1 Experiment
,” in
Proceedings of the 86th Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, DC
, January
2005
, Paper No. 06-3071.
8.
Muthadi
,
N.
, and
Kim
,
Y. R.
, “
Local Calibration of the MEPDG for Flexible Pavement Design
,” in
Proceedings of the 87th Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2008
, Paper No. 08-2920.
9.
Freeman
,
T.
,
Uzan
,
J.
,
Zollinger
,
D.
, and
Park
,
E.
, “
Sensitivity Analysis of and Strategic Plan Development for the Implementation of the M-E Design Guide in TxDOT Operations
,” Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4714-1, Texas Department of Transportation,
2006
.
10.
El-Basyouny
,
M.
,
Witczak
,
M.
, and
Kaloush
,
K.
, “
Development of the Permanent Deformation Models for the 2002 Design Guide
,” in
Proceedings of the 84th Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2005
, Paper No. 05-2525.
11.
Timm
,
D.
, and
Newcomb
,
D.
, “
Calibration of Flexible Pavement Performance Equations for Mn/ROAD
,” in
Proceedings of the 87th Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2008
, Paper No. 08-1102.
12.
Agardh
,
S.
, and
Busch
,
C.
, “
Incremental-Recursive Rut Depth Prediction Models—Calibration against Full-Scale Tests and Validation Against In-Service Roads
,” in
Proceedings of the 87th Transportation Research Board Meeting
, Paper No. 06-2132,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2006
.
13.
Kang
,
M.
, and
Adams
,
T.
, “
Local Calibration of the Fatigue Cracking Model in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide
,”
Proceedings of the 82nd Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2003
, Paper No. 03-2012.
14.
Kenis
,
W. J.
, and
Wang
,
W.
, “
Calibrating Mechanistic Flexible Pavement Rutting Models from Full Scale Accelerated Tests
,”
Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements
,
Seattle, WA
, August,
1997
, Volume
I
, pp.
663
672
.
15.
Hugo
,
F.
, and
Epps Martin
,
A. L.
, “
NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 325: Significant Findings from Full Scale Accelerated Pavement Testing
,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC,
2004
.
16.
Chen
,
D.
,
Zhou
,
F.
, and
Cortez
,
E.
, “
Determination of Load Damage Relationships Through Accelerated Pavement Testing
,”
J. Test. Eval.
 0090-3973 https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE13112, Vol.
34
, No.
4
,
2006
, pp.
1
7
.
17.
Cortez
,
E.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Yang
,
W.
, and
Petros
,
K.
, “
Analysis of Permanent Deformation In Flexible Pavements Built With Various Subgrade Soils At Various Moisture Conditions
,” in Proceedings of 86th Transportation Research Board Meeting,
Washington, DC
, January
2007
, Paper #07-2692.
18.
Hong
,
F.
, and
Prozzi
,
J. A.
, “
Evaluation of Equipment, Methods, and Pavement Design Implications of the AASHTO 2002 Axle Load Spectra Traffic Methodology
,” Report No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4510-1, Texas Department of Transportation,
2006
.
19.
Archilla
,
A. R.
, and
Madanat
,
S.
, “
Development of A Pavement Rutting Model from Experimental Data
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
 0733-947X https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:4(291), Vol.
126
, No.
4
,
2000
, pp.
291
299
.
20.
Hong
,
F.
, “
Modeling Heterogeneity in Transportation Infrastructure Deterioration: Application to Pavement
,” PhD Dissertation,
The University of Texas at Austin
,
2007
.
21.
Huang
,
Y. H.
,
Pavement Analysis and Design
,
Prentice Hall, Inc.
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
2003
.
22.
Hong
,
F.
, and
Prozzi
,
J. A.
, “
Equivalent Damage Factors Based on Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design
,” in
Proceedings of the 86th Transportation Research Board Meeting
,
Washington, D.C.
, January
2007
, Paper No. 07-2490.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.