Abstract

ASTM D 4832: Standard Test Method for Preparation and Testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Test Cylinders currently permits three types of capping for CLSM cylinders: sulfur mortar (ASTM C 617), gypsum plaster (ASTM C 617), and unbonded neoprene restrained by rigid retainers (ASTM C 1231). These cappings were developed for portland cement concrete (PCC) cylinders and all produce good estimates of PCC potential strength. However, these cappings are inappropriate for excavatable CLSM cylinders. Sulfur mortar and gypsum plaster methods often result in cylinder damage during capping due to the low strength of excavatable CLSM cylinders. The recommended 50 to 70 durometer neoprene pads are far too stiff at low stress levels, which are common in testing excavatable CLSM cylinders. The neoprene pads essentially act as a rigid plate rather than a capping material. The authors developed an unbonded capping system using a much softer neoprene that is more malleable at lower stress levels.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the new capping system, ten batches of an air-entrained and ten batches of a non-air-entrained excavatable CLSM were produced. Each batch was approximately 0.0453-m3, allowing 20 100-by-200 mm cylinders as well as flow consistency (ASTM D 6103) and gravimetric air tests (ASTM D 6023). Five pairs of cylinders were tested at 7 days and five pairs at 28 days. At each age, one pair was capped with each of the following materials: sulfur mortar, gypsum plaster, 50-durometer neoprene, nothing, and the new softer neoprene unbonded capping system.

The average 28-day compressive strength of the cylinders using the proposed capping system was 275 kPa (39.83 psi) for non-airentrained and 345 kPa (50.01 psi) for the air-entrained mix design. The proposed capping system was not significantly different than the sulfur mortar or gypsum plaster. It was significantly superior to 50-plaster durometer neoprene and the no-cap technique.

References

1.
Howard
,
A. K.
and
Hitch
,
J. L.
,
The Design and Application of Controlled Low-Strength Materials (Flowable Fill)
, ASTM STP 1331,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1998
.
2.
Brewer and Associates
, “
Factors Governing the Removability of Controlled Low Strength Material—Controlled Density Fill—(CLSM-CDF)
,” Controlled Low Strength (CLSM) Technical Reports, Maumee, OH,
1992
.
3.
ACI Committee 229
, “
Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM) (ACI 229R-94)
,”
American Concrete Institute
, Detroit, MI.
4.
Bhat
,
S. T.
and
Lovell
,
C. W.
, “
Mix Design for Flowable Fill
,”
Transportation Research Record
 0361-1981, No.
1589
,
National Academy Press
, Washington, DC,
1997
.
5.
Clem
,
Hansen
, and
Kowalsky
, “
Flowable Backfill for Pipeline Bedding at the Denver International Airport
(SP150-5),”
American Concrete Institute
,
Detroit, MI
,
1994
.
6.
Concrete in Practice—What, Why & How? Flowable Fill Materials
,”
National Ready Mixed Concrete Association
,
Maryland
,
1989
.
7.
Richardson
,
D. N.
, “
Review of Variables that Influence Measured Concrete Compressive Strength
,”
National Ready Mixed Concrete Association
,
Maryland
,
1991
.
8.
Crouch
,
L. K.
,
Gamble
,
R.
,
Brogdon
,
J. F.
, and
Tucker
,
C. J.
, “
Use of High-Fines Limestone Screenings as Aggregate for Excavatable Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM)
,”
The Design and Application of Controlled Low-Strength Materials (Flowable Fill)
, ASTM STP 1331,
Howard
A. K.
and
Hitch
J. L.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1998
.
9.
Majko
,
R. M.
, “
Laboratory Testing Program for Development of Controlled Low-Strength Materials
,”
American Fly Ash Co.
,
IL
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.