Abstract

An interlaboratory comparison was initiated by the ASTM C16 Committee on Thermal Insulation to determine the precision of the test method prescribed by ASTM Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials (E 96-95). Expanded polystyrene board was chosen as the test material. Nine laboratories completed the measurements according to the dry cup and the wet cup procedures prescribed by the standard. Statistical analyses of the data resulted in the following precision statement for the water vapor permeability:

Dry cup method:

Permeability of material = 3.1E-12 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

Repeatability standard deviation (within a laboratory) = 1.6E-1.3 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

Reproducibility standard deviation (between laboratories) = 4.7E-13 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

Wet cup method:

Permeability of material = 3.4E-12 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

Repeatability standard deviation (within a laboratory) = 1.7E-13 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

Reproducibility standard deviation (between laboratories) = 4.1E-13 kg m−1 s−1 Pa−1

A specific procedure was uniformly used to analyze the data and to calculate the permeability of the test material from the raw data provided by the participating laboratories. Corrections were made for the resistances offered by the still air layer inside the cup and by the specimen surfaces and for the edge masking details.

References

1.
Genge
,
G. R.
, “
Study of Thermal Insulation Standards for residential Applications
,”
Report submitted to the Canadian Coordinating Committee for Thermal Insulation Standards and Quality
,
03
1995
.
2.
Joy
,
F. A.
and
Wilson
,
A. G.
, “
Standardization of the Dish Method for Measuring Water Vapor Transmission
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Humidity and Moisture
,
Washington, DC
, Vol.
4
, Chap. 31,
1963
, pp.
259
-
270
.
3.
Tye
,
R. P.
, “
Relevant Moisture Properties of Building Construction Materials
,” Chapter 3,
Moisture Control in Buildings
,
Trechsel
,
H. R.
Ed., ASTM Manual Series: MNL 18,
1994
, pp.
35
-
53
.
4.
Hansen
,
K. K.
and
Lund
,
H. B.
, “
Cup Method for Determination of Water Vapour Transmission Properties of Building Materials. Sources of Uncertainty in the Method
,”
Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium
.
Building Physics in the Nordic Countries
,
Trondheim
,
1990
, pp.
291
-
298
.
5.
Lackey
,
J. C.
,
Marchand
,
R. G.
, and
Kumaran
,
M. K.
, “
A Logical Extension of the ASTM Standard E96 to Determine the Dependence of Water Vapor Transmission on Relative Humidity
,”
Insulation Materials: Testing and Applications: 3rd Volume
, ASTM STP 1320,
Graves
R. S.
and
Zarr
R. R.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshobocken, PA
,
1997
, pp.
454
-
470
.
6.
Galbraith
,
G. H.
, “
Intercomparison on Measurements of Water Vapour Permeability
,” ISSN 1018-5593, EUR 14329 EN, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom,
1993
, p. 102.
7.
McGlashan
,
M. L.
, “
Physico-Chemical Quantities and Units
,”
Royal Institute of Chemistry Monographs for Teachers
, No.
15
,
1971
, p. 8.
8.
Schirmer
,
R.
,
ZVDI
,
Beiheft Verfahrenstechnik
,
1938
, Nr.
6
, S. 170.
9.
Pedersen
,
C. R.
, “
combined Heat and Moisture Transfer in Building Constructions
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Thermal Insulation Laboratory, The Technical University of Denmark
,
1990
, p. 10.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.