Digital close range photogrammetry has proven to be a precise and efficient measurement technique for the assessment of shape accuracies of solar concentrators and their components. The combination of high quality mega-pixel digital still cameras, appropriate software, and calibrated reference scales in general is sufficient to provide coordinate measurements with precisions of 1:50,000 or better. The extreme flexibility of photogrammetry to provide high accuracy 3D coordinate measurements over almost any scale makes it particularly appropriate for the measurement of solar concentrator systems. It can also provide information for the analysis of curved shapes and surfaces, which can be very difficult to achieve with conventional measurement instruments. The paper gives an overview of quality indicators for photogrammetric networks, which have to be considered during the data evaluation to augment the measurement precision. A selection of measurements done on whole solar concentrators and their components are presented. The potential of photogrammetry is demonstrated by presenting measured effects arising from thermal expansion and gravitational forces on selected components. The measured surface data can be used to calculate slope errors and undertake ray-trace studies to compute intercept factors and assess concentrator qualities.

1.
Shortis
,
M. R.
, and
Johnston
,
G. H. G.
,
1996
, “
Photogrammetry: An Available Surface Characterization Tool for Solar Concentrators, Part 1: Measurement of Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
118
, pp.
146
150
.
2.
Shortis
,
M. R.
, and
Johnston
,
G. H. G.
,
1997
, “
Photogrammetry: An Available Surface Characterization Tool for Solar Concentrators, Part II: Assessment of Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
119
, pp.
286
291
.
3.
Lu¨pfert, E., Zarza, E., Geyer, M., Nava, P., Langenkamp, J., Schiel, W., Esteban, A., Osuna, R., and Mandelberg, E., 2003, “EuroTrough Collector Qualification Complete—Performance Test Results from PSA,” ISES Solar World Congress, Go¨teborg, Sweden.
4.
Riffelmann, K.-K., Neumann, A., and Wittkowski, M., 2003, “PARASCAN: A New Parabolic Trough Flux Scanner,” ISES Solar World Congress, Go¨teborg, Sweden.
5.
Ulmer, S., Riffelmann, K.-J., Lu¨pfert, E., and Neumann, A., 2004, “Comparative Flux Measurement and Raytracing for the Characterization of the Focal Region of Solar Parabolic Trough Collectors,” ASME Congress, Solar 2004, Portland, Oregon.
6.
Wendelin
,
T. J.
, and
Grossman
,
J. W.
,
1995
, “
Comparison of Three Methods for Optical Characterization of Point-Focus Concentrators
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
2
, pp.
775
780
.
7.
Wendelin, T. J., Jorgensen, G. J., and Wood, R. L., 1991, “SHOT: A Method for Characterizing the Surface Figure and Optical Performance of Point Focus Solar Concentrators,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., pp. 555–560.
8.
Jones, S. A., Gruetzner, J. K., Houser, R. M., Edgar, R. M., and Wendelin, T. J., 1997, “VSHOT Measurement Uncertainty and Sensitivity Study,” SAND97-1627C.
9.
Arqueros
,
F.
,
Jime´nez
,
A.
, and
Valverde
,
A.
,
2003
, “
A Novel Procedure for the Optical Characterization of Solar Concentrators
,”
Sol. Energy
,
75
, pp.
135
142
.
10.
Butler
,
B. L.
, and
Pettit
,
R. B.
,
1977
, “
Optical Evaluation Techniques for Reflecting Solar Concentrators
,”
Proc. SPIE
,
114
, pp.
43
49
.
11.
Ko¨hne, R., Rach, E., and Reich, F., 1985, “Prozessrechnergesteuerte Anlage zur optischen Vermessung großer Spiegeloberfla¨chen,” Forschungsbericht DFVLR-FB-85-58.
12.
Hansche, B. D., 1978, “Laser Ray Trace Tester for Parabolic Trough Solar Concentrators,” ISA, pp. 485–490.
13.
Fraser, C. S., 1984, “Network Design Considerations for Non-Topographic Photogrammetry,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 50(8), pp. 1115–1125.
14.
Dold, J., 1996, “Influence of Large Targets on the Results of Photogrammetric Bundle Adjustment,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 31(B5), pp. 119–123.
15.
Robson, S., and Shortis, M. R., 1998, “Practical Influences of Geometric and Radiometric Image Quality Provided by Different Digital Camera Systems,” Photogrammetric Record, 16(92), pp. 225–248.
16.
Shortis
,
M. R.
,
Clarke
,
T. A.
, and
Robson
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Practical Testing of the Precision and Accuracy of Target Image Centring Algorithms,” Videometrics IV
,
Proc. SPIE
,
2598
, pp.
65
76
.
17.
Shortis, M. R., and Fraser, C. S., 1998, “State of the Art 3D Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial and Engineering Applications,” Proceedings, Commission 6, 21st Congress of the International Federation of Surveyors, Brighton, England, pp. 272–290.
18.
Geometric Software P/L, “Vision Measurement System (VMS),” 15 Maranoa Crescent, Coburg 3058, Australia, http://www.geomsoft.com.
19.
Johnston
,
G.
,
1995
, “
On the Analysis of Surface Error Distributions on Concentrated Solar Collectors
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
117
, pp.
294
296
.
20.
Maas, H.-G., 1991, “Digital Photogrammetry for Determination of Tracer Particle Coordinates in Turbulent Flow Research,” Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing, 57(12), pp. 1593–1597.
21.
Shortis, M. R., and Snow, W. L., 1997, “Videometric Tracking of Wind Tunnel Aerospace Models at NASA Langley Research Center,” Photogrammetric Record, 15(85), pp. 673–689.
22.
Bo¨semann, W., 1996. “The Optical Tube Measurement System OLM—Photogrammetric Methods Used for Industrial Automation and Process Control,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 30(B5), pp. 304–309.
23.
Haggren, H., and Heikkila, J., 1990, “Photogrammetric Measuring of Windshield Frames in Automobile Manufacturing,” Surveying Science Finland, 1, pp. 10–18.
You do not currently have access to this content.