Solar hybrid power plants have a significant potential for cost reduction when the solar energy is introduced into a gas turbine system. The introduction into gas turbine systems could be realized with pressurized volumetric air receivers heating the compressed air of the gas turbine before it enters the combustor. A receiver module, consisting of a secondary concentrator and a volumetric receiver unit, was tested at the Plataforma Solar de Almerı´a, Spain. Air exit temperatures up to 815°C and power levels of 410 kW were achieved. Total solar test time summed up to 400 hours. Receiver efficiencies were in the range of 70%. A new secondary concentrator with improved efficiency was designed and built. Based on an inexpensive manufacturing technology, the secondary concentrator geometry was optimized to reduce the optical losses. Performance tests with this new secondary concentrator and a cold-water calorimeter proved the expected increase in efficiency of about 10%. Maximum operation power was 450 kW at the exit aperture. The dependency of performance on the incidence-angle showed good agreement with the predictions, as well as the results of a special photographic measurement campaign. Several configurations of solar-hybrid gas turbine cycles in the low to medium power range are examined for performance and costs. The results confirm the promising potential of this technology to reach competitiveness in certain power markets; a comparison between a 30 MW solar-hybrid combined cycle plant and an ISCCS power plant are presented. Future developments for system improvement and cost reduction are discussed.

1.
Kribus
,
A.
,
Zaibel
,
R.
,
Carrey
,
D.
,
Segal
,
A.
, and
Karni
,
J.
,
1997
, “
A Solar-Driven Combined Cycle Power Plant
,”
Sol. Energy
,
62
, pp.
121
129
.
2.
Buck, R., Abele, M., Kunberger, J., Denk, T., Heller, P., and Lu¨pfert, E., 1998, “Receiver for Solar-Hybrid Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Systems,” Proc. of 9th SolarPACES Int. Symp. on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, June 22-26, 1998, Font-Romeu, France, pp. 537–544.
3.
Buck, R., Lu¨pfert, E., and Te´llez, F., 2000, “Receiver for Solar-Hybrid Gas Turbine and CC Systems (REFOS),” Proc. of 10th SolarPACES Int. Symp. Solar Thermal 2000, March 8–10, 2000, Sydney, Australia, pp. 95–100.
4.
Lu¨pfert, E., Monterreal, R., Heller, P., and Reche, J. F., 2000, “Concentrated Solar Radiation Measurement With Video Image Processing and Online Fluxgage Calibration,” Proc. of 10th SolarPACES Int. Symp. Solar Thermal 2000, March 8–10, 2000, Sydney, Australia.
5.
Timinger, A. et al., 1998, “Optical in-situ analysis of secondary reflectors in solar tower plants,” Proc. of 9th SolarPACES Int. Symp. on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, June 22–26, 1998, Font-Romeu, France, pp. 117–122.
6.
Schwarzbo¨zl, P., Pitz-Paal, R., Meinecke W., and Buck, R., 2000, “Cost-Optimized Solar Gas Turbine Cycles Using Volumetric Air Receiver Technology,” Proc. of 10th SolarPACES Int. Symp. Solar Thermal 2000, March 8–10, 2000, Sydney, Australia, pp. 171–177.
7.
Catalog of Solar Heliostats. SolarPACES Technical Report No. III-1/00. 2000.
8.
Price
,
H. W.
,
Whitney
,
D. D.
, and
Beebe
,
H. I. B.
,
1996
, “
SMUD Kokhala Power Tower Study
,”
Solor Enginering
,
118
, pp.
273
276
.
9.
Romero
,
M.
,
Marcos
,
M. J.
,
Te´llez
,
F. M.
,
Blanco
,
M.
,
Ferna´ndez
,
V.
,
Baonza
,
F.
, and
Berger
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Distributed Power from Solar Tower Systems: A MIUS Approach
,”
Sol. Energy
,
67
, pp.
249
264
.
10.
Roy, A., Meinecke, W., Blanco, M. M. (eds.), 1997, “Introductory Guidelines for Preparing Reports on Solar Thermal Power Systems,” SolarPACES Tech. Report No. III-3/97.
11.
Hennecke, K., (ed.) 1997, “Advanced Hybrid Plant Concepts,” SolarPACES Tech. Report No. III-5/97.
12.
SolarPACES Activity Trough Integration into Power Plants (TIPP) (to be published).
You do not currently have access to this content.