Abstract

Bolted flange joints are part of pressure vessel and piping components and are extensively used in the chemical, petrochemical, and nuclear power industries. They are simple structures and offer the possibility of disassembly, which makes them attractive to connect pressurized equipment and piping. In addition to being prone to leakage, they often require maintenance while in operation in which case the bolts are either retightened as in hot torquing or untightened to be replaced. Although costly shutdowns are avoided, such maintenance work exposes the operator to a potential risk because the bolt load alteration can produce a gasket load unbalance, which results in the local gasket contact stress to drop below some critical value, causing major leak and hence jeopardizing the life of the worker. This paper addresses the issue of the contact stress level unbalance around the flange when the bolts are subjected to initial tightening. The study compares the contact stress distribution variations, an analytical developed model based on the theory of rings on elastic foundation, to those given by the finite element model and the simple beam on elastic foundation model developed by Koves (2007, “Flange Joint Bolt Spacing Requirements,” Proceedings of PVP2007, ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference). This study is developed for the purpose of helping limit the degree of load increase in hot torquing or the maximum number of bolts to be replaced at a time and identify those flanges for which the bolt cannot be replaced in service.

1.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2007, “
Rules for Bolted Flange Connections With Ring Type Gaskets
,” Section VIII, Division 2, Appendix 2.
2.
EN 1591-1:2001 E, Flanges and Their Joints—Design Rules for Gasketed Circular Flange Connections Part 1: Calculation Method.
3.
Waters
,
E. O.
,
Rossheim
,
D. B.
,
Wesstrom
,
D. B.
, and
Williams
,
F. S. G.
, 1937, “
Formulas for Stresses in Bolted Flanged Connections
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
59
, pp.
161
169
.
4.
Waters
,
E. O.
,
Rossheim
,
D. B.
,
Wesstrom
,
D. B.
, and
Williams
,
F. S. G.
, 1949,
Development of General Formulas for Bolted Flanges
,
Taylor Forge and Pipe Works
,
Chicago, IL
.
5.
G&W Taylor-Bonney Division
, 1978,
Modern Flange Design: Bulletin 502
, 7th ed.,
Pipe Works
,
Southfield, MI
.
6.
George
,
P. B.
, 2007,
Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association
, 9th ed.,
TEMA
,
New York
, p.
10017
.
7.
Lehnhoff
,
T. F.
,
McKay
,
M. L.
, and
Bellora
,
V. A.
, 1992, “
Member Stiffness and Bolt Spacing of Bolted Joints
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division, PVP, Recent Advances in Structural Mechanics
, Vol.
248
, pp.
63
72
.
8.
McKee
,
R.
, and
Reddy
,
H.
, 1995, “
Apparent Stiffness of a Bolted Flange
,”
Computer Integrated Concurrent Design Conference
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Design Engineering Division, DE-Vol.
83
,, No. 2, Pt. 2, pp.
877
883
.
9.
Roberts
,
I.
, 1950, “
Gaskets and Bolted Joints
,”
ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
17
(
2
), pp.
169
179
.
10.
Kilborn
,
D. F.
, 1975, “
Spacing of Bolts in Flanged Joints
,” Transactions of The Institute of Marine Engineers, Vol.
87
, Ser A, No. 7, pp.
339
342
.
11.
Koves
,
W. J.
, 2007, “
Flange Joint Bolt Spacing Requirements
,”
Proceedings of PVP2007, ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, Design and Analysis
, PVP Vol. 3, pp. 3−10.
12.
Volterra
,
E.
, and
Gaines
,
J. H.
, 1974,
Advanced Strength of Materials
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, pp.
379
424
.
13.
ANSYS, 2004, ANSYS Structural Analysis Guide, Version 11.
14.
M’hadheb
,
M.
, 2005, “
Effet de l’Espacement des Boulons sur la Distribution des Contraintes dans un Assemblage à Brides Boulonnées Muni d’un Joint d’Étanchéité
,” MS thesis, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada.
15.
MATLAB, Release 14 with Service Pack 2 (R14SP2), MATLAB Products, 1994-2005, The MathWorks, Inc.
16.
Nechache
,
A.
, and
Bouzid
,
A.
, 2007, “
Creep Analysis of Bolted Flange Joints
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
(
3
), pp.
185
194
.
17.
Bouzid
,
A. H.
, and
Champliaud
,
H.
, 2004, “
Contact Stress Evaluation of Nonlinear Gaskets Using Dual Kriging Interpolation
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
126
(
4
), pp.
445
450
.
18.
Braun
,
M.
, 1983,
Differential Equations and Their Applications
, 3rd ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.