Residual stress may have a significant effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints. As a nonfluctuating stress, it has an effect similar to that of the mean stress. Recently the International Association of Ship Classification Societies (IACS) has issued Common Structural Rules (CSR) for respectively tankers and bulk carriers. The effect of mean stress in fatigue design is taken into account in both sets of rules. However, the treatment is quite different, in particular with regard to residual stress and shakedown effects. In the present paper a comparative study of fatigue design procedures of the IACS rules is reported, with emphasis on residual stress effects. Testing was carried out with longitudinal attachment welds in the as-welded condition. The initial residual stress was measured by a sectioning method using strain gauges. Hot spot stress was determined experimentally by strain gauges and numerically by finite element analysis using different types of elements. Fatigue testing was carried out and SN-curves were plotted according to the relevant stress as specified by the rules. In order to investigate the shakedown effect of residual stress, testing was performed for several preload conditions, which could be taken to represent maximum load levels in a load history. The aim of the study is to contribute towards a better understanding of the effect of residual stress and shakedown on fatigue strength of welded joints.

References

1.
Ghose
,
D. J.
,
Nappi
,
N. S.
, and
Wiernick
,
C. J.
, 1994, “
Residual Strength of Damaged Marine Structures
,”
Ship Structure Committee
,
U.S. Coast Guard
,
Washington, D.C.
2.
Gurney
,
T. R.
, 1976, “
Fatigue Design Rules for Welded Steel Joints
,” The Welding Institute Research Bulletin, 17, May.
3.
IACS, 2006, “
Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers
,” International Association of Classification Societies.
4.
IACS, 2006, “
Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers
,” International Association of Classification Societies.
5.
Eide
,
O. I.
, and
Berge
,
S.
, 1982, “
Residual Stress and Stress Interaction in Fatigue Testing of Welded Joints
,”
Residual Stress Effects in Fatigue, ASTM STP
776
, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.
115
131
.
6.
Fricke
,
W.
, 2005, “
Effects of Residual Stresses on the Fatigue Behaviour of Welded Steel Structures
,”
Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech.
,
36
(
11
), pp.
642
649
.
7.
Lotsberg
,
I.
, 2006, “
Assessment of Fatigue Capacity in the New Bulk Carrier and Tanker Rules
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
19
(
1
), p.
83
96
.
8.
McClung
,
R. C.
, 2007, “
A Literature Survey on the Stability and Significance of Residual Stresses During Fatigue
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
173
205
.
9.
Iida
,
K.
, and
M.
,
Takanashi
, 1999, “
Relaxation of Welding Residual Stresses by Reversed and Repeated Loadings
,”
Welding Research Abroad
,
45
(
8
), pp.
27
40
.
10.
Takanashi
,
M.
,
Kamata
,
K.
, and
Iida
,
K.
, 2001, “
Relaxation Behaviour of Welding Residual Stresses by Fatigue Loading in Smooth Longitudinal Butt Welded Joints
,”
Welding Research Abroad
,
47
(
3
), pp.
2
8
.
11.
Li
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
B.
, and
Moan
,
T.
, 2007, “
Residual Stress Shakedown in Typical Weld Joints and Its Effect on Fatigue of FPSO’s
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference of On Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-OMAE
,
San Diego, California
.
12.
Radaj
,
D.
,
Sonsino
,
C. M.
, and
Fricke
,
W.
, 2006,
Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints by Local Approaches
,
Woodhead Publishing Limited
,
Cambridge, England
.
13.
Zhang
,
B.
, and
T.
Moan
, 2006, “
Mean Stress Effect on Fatigue Welded Joint FPSOs
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference of On Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-OMAE
,
Hamburg, Germany
.
14.
DNV, 2008, “
DNV CN. 30.7 Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structures
,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway.
You do not currently have access to this content.