A suspension bridge is being built over the Tacoma Narrows, Washington. The bridge will be placed on a structure mounted on two large concrete caissons, which will be exposed to strong currents. The piers are of rectangular section with chamfered edges in the upper portion. The caissons are being built at site while floating and moored in high currents. There are no known analytical methods or experimental data available on such structures at high Reynolds number. In order to determine the forces on the caisson due to current, a series of scaled physical model tests of one of the caissons was carried out. The forces on the caisson were measured in the presence of the existing bridge pier and the bottom contours of the Narrows were accurately modeled. The model scale was chosen as 1:100 and the tests were performed for the caisson at different drafts. This paper describes the test setup, and measurement system for a series of fixed caisson tests and demonstrates the consistency of the test data. The measured inline drag and transverse lift forces on the fixed caisson at different drafts are presented and the effect of the fluid velocity and flow vorticity on the frequency contents in the forces is discussed. The interaction effect of the neighboring existing pier on the current forces on the caisson is investigated. Since the measured forces were applied in the design analysis of the caissons, the scaling effect of the model test is also discussed. This paper is accompanied by two other papers, which form a group of three papers related to the project describing the current excitation on the caisson and the associated caisson responses. The other two papers in succession are by Chakrabarti et al. (J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., to be published) and Chakrabarti and McBride (J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., to be published). The paper by Chakrabarti et al. describes the numerical computation of the current forces on the caisson by a three-dimensional analysis, while the paper by Chakrabarti and McBride uses the information from these two papers to determine the motion response of the caissons and the mooring line tensions.

1.
Griffin
,
O. M.
, 1985, “
Vortex Shedding from Bluff Bodies in a Shear Flow: A Review
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
107
, pp.
298
306
.
2.
Chakrabarti
,
S. K.
,
Cotter
,
D. C.
, and
Palo
,
P.
, 1992 “
Shear Current Forces on a Submerged Cylinder
,”
Ocean Engineering
,
Elsevier
, UK, Vol.
19
, pp.
136
-
162
.
3.
Bishop
,
R. E. D.
, and
Hassan
,
Y.
, “
The Lift and Drag Forces on a Circular Cylinder Oscillating in a Flowing Fluid
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London
0962-8444,
277
, pp.
51
75
.
4.
Humphries
,
J. A.
, and
Walker
,
D. H.
, 1987 “
Vortex Excited Response of Large Scale Cylinders in Shear Flow
,”
Proceedings of Sixth International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, ASME, New York
, Vol.
2
,
Houston
, TX, pp.
139
143
.
5.
Kiya
,
M.
,
Tamura
,
H.
, and
Arie
,
M.
, 1980 “
Vortex-Shedding from a Circular Cylinder in Moderate-Reynolds Number Shear-Flow
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
101
, pp.
721
736
.
6.
Chakrabarti
,
S. K.
, 1994,
Offshore Structure Modeling
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
7.
Chakrabarti
,
S. K.
, and
McBride
,
M.
, 2004, “
Current Forces on a Large Pier near an Existing Pier
,”
Proceedings of 23rd International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, ASME, New York
, OMAE2004-51259 Vancouver, Canada.
You do not currently have access to this content.