An automated approach to ultimate hull girder strength assessment using DRDC’s ultimate strength analysis suite (ULTSAS) is described. The analysis suite improves the ability to perform rapid ultimate strength assessments by providing access to UK and Canadian analysis codes and databases under a single user interface. The interface also allows for automatic cross-sectional model generation from three-dimensional ship finite element models with the MGDSA program. The main features of the ULTSAS system are described, including cross-sectional modelling, and the use of load-shortening curve databases. The paper also provides a review of the progressive collapse method for determining ultimate strength, which is now used in both the UK and Canadian analysis codes. Two numerical approaches are described, one based on curvature incrementing and the other on moment incrementing. It is shown that the moment incrementing procedure produces more accurate bi-axial interaction curves in some instances. Results are obtained for two damage configurations of the HALIFAX class frigate.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
ships, buckling, failure (mechanical), bending strength, mechanical engineering
Topics:
Collapse, Damage, Databases, Girders, Hull, Stress, Tensile strength, Ships, Buckling
1.
Caldwell
,
J. B.
,
1965
, “
Ultimate Longitudinal Strength
,”
Transactions of RINA
,
107
, pp.
411
–
430
.
2.
Smith, C. S., 1977, “Influence of Local Compression Failure on Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of a Ship’s Hull,” Proc. PRADS, International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 73–79.
3.
Chen
,
Y-K.
,
Kutt
,
L. M.
,
Piaszczyk
,
C. M.
, and
Bieniek
,
M. P.
,
1983
, “
Ultimate Strength of Ship Structures
,”
SNAME Transactions
,
91
, pp.
149
–
168
.
4.
Ueda, Y., and Rashed, S. M. H., 1991, “Advances in the Application of ISUM to Marine Structures,” Advances in Marine Structures—2, C. Smith and R. S. Dow, eds. Elsevier, London, pp. 628–649.
5.
Pegg, N. G., and Cox, P., 1985, “ULTMAT—A Program for Predicting the Ultimate Strength of Ship Cross Sections,” DREA Technical Communication 85/313, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
6.
Dow, R. S., Hugill, R. C., Clark, J. D., and Smith, C. S., 1981, “Evaluation of Ultimate Ship Hull Strength,” Proc. Extreme Loads Response Symposium, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, pp. 133–147.
7.
Smith
,
C. S.
,
Anderson
,
N.
,
Chapman
,
J. C.
,
Davidson
,
P. C.
, and
Dowling
,
P. J.
,
1992
, “
Strength of Stiffened Plating Under Combined Compression and Lateral Pressure
,”
Transactions of RINA
,
134
, pp.
131
–
147
.
8.
Smith, M. J., and Pegg, N. G., 2000, “Automated Assessment of Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of Ship Hulls,” DREA Technical Memorandum TM 2000-143, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
9.
DSA-GP Graphics System, User’s Manual, 1996, Martec Limited, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
10.
Pegg, N. G., 1999, “Development of the ISSMM Software Tool for Residual Strength Assessment of Ship Structures,” DREA Technical Memorandum TM 1999-055, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
11.
Adamchak, J. C., 1984, “An Approximate Method for Estimating the Collapse of a Ship’s Hull in Preliminary Design,” Ship Structure Symposium ’84, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, pp. 37–61.
12.
Gordo
,
J. M.
,
Guedes Soares
,
C.
, and
Faulkner
,
D.
,
1996
, “
Approximate Assessment of the Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of the Hull Girder
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
40
, pp.
60
–
69
.
13.
Chen, Q., Zimmerman, T. J. E., DeGeer, D. D., and Kennedy, B. W., 1997, “Strength and Stability of Stiffened Panel Components,” Ship Structures Committee Report SSC-399.
14.
Jiang, L., and Chernuka M. W., 2000, “Improved Nonlinear Solution Techniques in the VAST Finite Element Program,” DREA Contractor Report CR 2000-101, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
15.
Jiang, L., and Chernuka, M., 2000, “Incorporation of UK NS94 Ultimate Strength Analysis in MGDSA, Part I: Engineering Considerations,” DREA Contractor Report CR 2000-112, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
16.
Lichodzijewski, M., and Jiang, L., 2000. “Incorporation of UK NS94 Ultimate Strength Analysis in MGDSA, Part II: Software Considerations,” DREA Contractor Report CR 2000-113, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
17.
Lichodzijewski, M., and MacAdam, T., 2000. “Ultimate Strength Application Version 1.0 User’s Manual,” DREA Contractor Report CR 2000-114, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
18.
MAESTRO—Method for Analysis Evaluation and Structural Optimization, Version 7.1.1 User’s Manual, 1996, Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD.
19.
Smith, M. J., 2001. “Progressive Collapse Method for Ultimate Hull Girder Strength Assessment,” DREA Technical Memorandum TM 2001-145, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
20.
Dow, R. S., 1997, Private Communication.
21.
VAST—Vibration and Strength Analysis, Version 7.2 User’s Manual, 1997, Martec Limited, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
22.
ASAS-NL. Version 2.0 User’s Manual (Update 4), 1998. WS Atkins Engineering Software, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.