Abstract

Boundary-element methods, also known as panel methods, have been widely used for computations of wave loads and other hydrodynamic characteristics associated with the interactions of offshore structures with waves. In the conventional approach, based on the low-order panel method, the submerged surface of the structure is represented by a large number of small quadrilateral plane elements, and the solution for the velocity potential or source strength is approximated by a constant value on each element. In this paper, we describe two recent developments of the panel method. One is a higher-order method where the submerged surface can be represented exactly, or approximated to a high degree of accuracy by B-splines, and the velocity potential is also approximated by B-splines. This technique, which was first used in the research code HIPAN, has now been extended and implemented in WAMIT. In many cases of practical importance, it is now possible to represent the geometry exactly to avoid the extra work required previously to develop panel input files for each structure. It is also possible to combine the same or different structures which are represented in this manner, to analyze multiple-body hydrodynamic interactions. Also described is the pre-corrected Fast Fourier Transform method (pFFT) which can reduce the computational time and required memory of the low-order method by an order of magnitude. In addition to descriptions of the two methods, several different applications are presented.

1.
Hess
,
J. L.
, and
Smith
,
A. M. O.
,
1964
, “
Calculation of nonlifting potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional bodies
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
8
, pp.
22
44
.
2.
Korsmeyer, F. T., Lee, C.-H., Newman, J. N., and Sclavounos, P. D., 1988, “The analysis of wave interactions with Tension-Leg Platforms,” Proc. OMAE Conf., Houston.
3.
Molin, B., and Chen, X. B., 1990, Vertical resonant motions of tension leg platforms, unpublished report, Institut Franc¸ais du Pe´trole, Paris.
4.
Herfjord, K., and Nielsen, F. G., 1992 “A comparative study on computed motion response for floating production platforms: Discussion of practical procedures,” Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Structures (BOSS’92), 1, London, pp. 19–37.
5.
Eatock
,
T. R.
, and
Chau
,
F. P.
,
1992
, “
Wave diffraction theory-some developments in linear and nonlinear theory
,”
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
114
, pp.
185
194
.
6.
Lee, C.-H., and Newman, J. N., 1994 “Second-Order wave effects on offshore structures,” Proc. of 7th, Intl. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Structures (BOSS ’94), 2, Pergamon, pp. 133–145.
7.
Maniar, H., 1995, “A three dimensional higher order panel method based on B-splines,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8.
Lee, C.-H., Maniar, H. D., Newman, J. N., and Zhu, X., 1996, “Computations of wave loads using a B-spline panel method,” Proc. of 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 75–92.
9.
Lee, C.-H., 1997, “Wave interaction with huge floating structure,” Proc. of 8th. Intl. Conf. on Behavior of Offshore Structures (BOSS ’97), Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 253–265.
10.
Phillips
,
J. R.
, and
White
,
J. K.
,
1997
, “
A precorrected-FFT method for electrostatic analysis of complicated 3-D structures
,”
IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des.
,
16
(
10
), pp.
1059
1072
.
11.
Korsmeyer, F. T., Klemas, T. J., White, J. K., and Phillips, J. R., 1999, “Fast hydrodynamic analysis of large offshore structures,” Proc. of Int. Symp. on Offshore and Polar Engineering, ISOPE ’99, Brest, France.
12.
Wehausen, J. V., and Laitone, E. V., 1960, “Surface waves,” Encyclopedia of Physics, Springer, 9, pp. 446–778.
13.
Anon., 2000, “WAMIT User Manual,” WAMIT, Inc. (available from the website www.wamit.com).
14.
McIver
,
P.
, and
McIver
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Trapped modes in an axisymmetric water-wave problem
,”
Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math.
,
50
, pp.
165
178
.
15.
Newman
,
J. N.
,
1999
, “
Radiation and diffraction analysis of the McIver toroid
,”
J. Eng. Math.
,
35
, pp.
135
147
.
16.
Lee, C.-H., and Newman, J. N., 2001, “Solution of radiation problems with exact geometry,” Proc. of 16th Int. Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 93–96.
17.
Molin, B., 2000, “On the sloshing modes in moonpools, or the dispersion equation for progressive waves in a channel through the ice sheet,” Proc. of 15th Int. Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Caesaria, Israel, pp. 122–125.
18.
Maniar
,
H. D.
, and
Newman
,
J. N.
,
1997
, “
Wave diffraction by a long array of cylinders
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
339
, pp.
309
330
.
19.
Newman, J. N., 2001, “Wave effects on multiple bodies,” Conf. on Hydrodynamics in Ship and Ocean Engineering, Kyushu Univ., Japan, pp. 3–26.
20.
Newman, J. N., and Lee, C.-H., 1992, “Sensitivity of wave loads to the discretization of bodies,” Proc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Behavior of Offshore Structures (BOSS ’92), 1, London, 1992, pp. 50–64.
21.
Hsin, C.-Y., Kerwin, J. E., and Newman, J. N., 1993, A two dimensional higher-order panel method based on B-splines, theory and program documentation, Report 93-3, Dept of Ocean Engineering, MIT, Cambridge MA.
22.
Lee
,
C.-H.
, and
Newman
,
J. N.
,
2000
, “
An assessment of hydroelasticity for very large hinged vessels
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
14
, pp.
957
970
.
23.
Lee
,
C.-H.
, and
Newman
,
J. N.
,
1991
, “
First- and second- order wave effects on a submerged spheroid
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
35
, pp.
183
190
.
24.
Ferreira, M. D., and Lee, C.-H., 1994, “Computation of second-order mean wave forces and moments in multibody interaction,” Proc. of 7th. Intl. Conf. on Behaviour of Offshore Structures (BOSS ’94), 2, Pergamon, pp. 303–313.
You do not currently have access to this content.