A major challenge in structural health monitoring (SHM) is to accurately identify both the location and severity of damage using the dynamic response information acquired. While in theory the vibration-based and impedance-based methods may facilitate damage identification with the assistance of a credible baseline finite element model, the response information is generally limited, and the measurements may be heterogeneous, making an inverse analysis using sensitivity matrix difficult. Aiming at fundamental advancement, in this research we cast the damage identification problem into an optimization problem where possible changes of finite element properties due to damage occurrence are treated as unknowns. We employ the multiple damage location assurance criterion (MDLAC), which characterizes the relation between measurements and predictions (under sampled elemental property changes), as the vector-form objective function. We then develop an enhanced, multi-objective version of the dividing rectangles (DIRECT) approach to solve the optimization problem. The underlying idea of the multi-objective DIRECT approach is to branch and bound the unknown parametric space to converge to a set of optimal solutions. A new sampling scheme is established, which significantly increases the efficiency in minimizing the error between measurements and predictions. The enhanced DIRECT algorithm is particularly suited to solving for unknowns that are sparse, as in practical situations structural damage affects only a small region. A number of test cases using vibration response information are executed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach.

References

1.
Michaels
,
J. E.
, and
Michaels
,
T. E.
,
2007
, “
Guided Wave Signal Processing and Image Fusion for In Situ Damage Localization in Plates
,”
Wave Motion
,
44
(
6
), pp.
482
492
.
2.
Harley
,
J. B.
, and
Moura
,
J. M. F.
,
2014
, “
Data-Driven Matched Field Processing for Lamb Wave Structural Health Monitoring
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
135
(
3
), pp.
1231
1244
.
3.
Cawley
,
P.
, and
Simonetti
,
F.
,
2005
, “
Structural Health Monitoring Using Guided Waves–Potential and Challenges
,”
Fifth International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring
, pp.
503
510
.
4.
West
,
H. H.
, and
Mafi
,
M.
,
1984
, “
Eigenvalues for Beam-Columns on Elastic Supports
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
110
(
6
), pp.
1305
1320
.
5.
Kim
,
J. T.
, and
Stubbs
,
N.
,
2003
, “
Crack Detection in Beam-Type Structures Using Frequency Data
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
259
(
1
), pp.
145
160
.
6.
Annamdas
,
V. G. M.
, and
Radhika
,
M. A.
,
2013
, “
Electromechanical Impedance of Piezoelectric Transducers for Monitoring Metallic and Non-Metallic Structures: A Review of Wired, Wireless and Energy-Harvesting Methods
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
,
24
(
9
), pp.
1021
1042
.
7.
Shuai
,
Q.
,
Zhou
,
K.
,
Zhou
,
S.
, and
Tang
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Fault Identification Using Piezoelectric Impedance Measurement and Model-Based Intelligent Inference With Pre-Screening
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
26
(
4
), p.
045007
.
8.
Cao
,
P.
,
Shuai
,
Q.
, and
Tang
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Structural Damage Identification Using Piezoelectric Impedance Measurement With Sparse Inverse Analysis
,” eprint
arXiv:1708.02968
.https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02968
9.
Kim
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
K. W.
,
2014
, “
An Enhanced Impedance-Based Damage Identification Method Using Adaptive Piezoelectric Circuitry
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
23
(
9
), p.
095041
.
10.
Hao
,
H.
, and
Xia
,
Y.
,
2002
, “
Vibration-Based Damage Detection of Structures by Genetic Algorithm
,”
J. Comput. Civil Eng.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
222
229
.
11.
Villalba
,
J. D.
, and
Laier
,
J. E.
,
2012
, “
Localising and Quantifying Damage by Means of a Multi-Chromosome Genetic Algorithm
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
50
, pp.
150
157
.
12.
Seyedpoor
,
S. M.
,
2012
, “
A Two Stage Method for Structural Damage Detection Using a Modal Strain Energy Based Index and Particle Swarm Optimization
,”
Int. J. Nonlinear Mech.
,
47
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
13.
He
,
R.-S.
, and
Hwang
,
S.-F.
,
2006
, “
Damage Detection by an Adaptive Real-Parameter Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
84
(
31
), pp.
2231
2243
.
14.
Seyedpoor
,
S. M.
,
Shahbandeh
,
S.
, and
Yazdanpanah
,
O.
,
2015
, “
An Efficient Method for Structural Damage Detection Using a Differential Evolution Algorithm-Based Optimisation Approach
,”
Civil Eng. Environ. Syst.
,
32
(
3
), pp.
230
250
.
15.
Messina
,
A.
,
Williams
,
E. J.
, and
Contursi
,
T.
,
1998
, “
Structural Damage Detection by a Sensitivity and Statistical-Based Method
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
216
(
5
), pp.
791
808
.
16.
Cao
,
P.
,
Yoo
,
D.
,
Shuai
,
Q.
, and
Tang
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Structural Damage Identification With Multi-Objective DIRECT Algorithm Using Natural Frequencies and Single Mode Shape
,”
Proc. SPIE
,
10170
, p. 101702H.
17.
Jones
,
D. R.
,
Perttunen
,
C. D.
, and
Stuckman
,
B. E.
,
1993
, “
Lipschitzian Optimization Without the Lipschitz Constant
,”
J. Optim. Theory Appl.
,
79
(
1
), pp.
157
181
.
18.
Fan
,
W.
, and
Qiao
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Vibration-Based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study
,”
Struct. Health Monit.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
83
111
.
19.
Nobahari
,
M.
, and
Seyedpoor
,
S. M.
,
2011
, “
Structural Damage Detection Using an Efficient Correlation-Based Index and a Modified Genetic Algorithm
,”
Math. Comput. Modell.
,
53
(
9
), pp.
1798
1809
.
20.
Shubert
,
B. O.
,
1972
, “
A Sequential Method Seeking the Global Maximum of a Function
,”
SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
379
388
.
21.
Finkel
,
D. E.
,
2005
, “
Global Optimization With the DIRECT Algorithm
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1087602
22.
Cao
,
P.
,
Fan
,
Z.
,
Gao
,
R.
, and
Tang
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Complex Housing: Modelling and Optimization Using an Improved Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing Algorithm
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2016-60563.
23.
Wang
,
L.
,
Ishida
,
H.
,
Hiroyasu
,
T.
, and
Miki
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Examination of Multi-Objective Optimization Method for Global Search Using DIRECT and GA
,”
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation
(
CEC
), Hong Kong, China, June 1–6, pp.
2446
2451
.
24.
Al-Dujaili
,
A.
, and
Suresh
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Dividing Rectangles Attack Multi-Objective Optimization
,”
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation
(
CEC
), Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 24–29, pp.
3606
3613
.
25.
Wong
,
C. S. Y.
,
Al-Dujaili
,
A.
, and
Sundaram
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Hypervolume-Based DIRECT for Multi-Objective Optimisation
,”
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
(
GECCO
), Denver, CO, July 20–24, pp.
1201
1208
.
26.
Deb
,
K.
,
Pratap
,
A.
,
Agarwal
,
S.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T. A. M. T.
,
2002
, “
A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II
,”
IEEE Trans. Evol. Computation
,
6
(
2
), pp.
182
197
.
27.
Guo
,
H. Y.
, and
Li
,
Z. L.
,
2009
, “
A Two-Stage Method to Identify Structural Damage Sites and Extents by Using Evidence Theory and Micro-Search Genetic Algorithm
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
769
782
.
You do not currently have access to this content.