The major part of production cost of a manufacturing product is set during the design stage and especially by the tolerancing choice. Therefore, a lot of work involves trying to simulate the impact of these choices and provide an automatic optimization. For integrating this modeling in computer aided design (cad) software, the tolerancing must be modeled by a mathematical tool. Numerous models have been developed but few of them are really efficient. Two advanced models are “T-map” model developed by Joseph K. Davidson and “deviation domain” developed by Max Giordano. Despite the graphical representation of these two models seems to be similar, they have significant differences in their construction and their resolution method. These similarities and differences highlight the needs of tolerancing modeling tool in each kind of problems, especially in case of assembly with parallel links.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2013
Research-Article
Comparison of Two Similar Mathematical Models for Tolerance Analysis: T-Map and Deviation Domain
Max Giordano,
Max Giordano
e-mail: Max.Giordano@univ-savoie.fr
Laboratoire S.Y.M.M.E.
,5 chemin de Bellevue
,Annecy-le-vieux 74 940
, France
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph K. Davidson
Joseph K. Davidson
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
e-mail: j.davidson@asu.edu
Aerospace Engineering,
Arizona State University
,Tempe, AZ 85287
e-mail: j.davidson@asu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Max Giordano
e-mail: Max.Giordano@univ-savoie.fr
Laboratoire S.Y.M.M.E.
,5 chemin de Bellevue
,Annecy-le-vieux 74 940
, France
Joseph K. Davidson
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
e-mail: j.davidson@asu.edu
Aerospace Engineering,
Arizona State University
,Tempe, AZ 85287
e-mail: j.davidson@asu.edu
Contributed by the Design for Manufacturing Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received January 4, 2013; final manuscript received July 5, 2013; published online September 5, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Rikard Söderberg.
J. Mech. Des. Oct 2013, 135(10): 101008 (7 pages)
Published Online: September 5, 2013
Article history
Received:
January 4, 2013
Revision Received:
July 5, 2013
Citation
Mansuy, M., Giordano, M., and Davidson, J. K. (September 5, 2013). "Comparison of Two Similar Mathematical Models for Tolerance Analysis: T-Map and Deviation Domain." ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2013; 135(10): 101008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024980
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Multi-Layer Parallelogram Flexure Architecture for Higher Out-of-Plane Load Bearing Stiffness
J. Mech. Des (July 2025)
Reading Users' Minds With Large Language Models: Mental Inference for Artificial Empathy in Design
J. Mech. Des (June 2025)
MSEval: A Dataset for Material Selection in Conceptual Design to Evaluate Algorithmic Models
J. Mech. Des (April 2025)
Related Articles
Parametric-Based Determination of Cylindrical Variations in Geometric Tolerancing
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (August,2000)
Assessing Circularity in Three Dimensions
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2001)
3D Simulation of Manufacturing Defects for Tolerance Analysis
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (June,2010)
Semantic Tolerance Modeling With Generalized Intervals
J. Mech. Des (August,2008)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Aircraft Winglet Assembly Tolerance Analysis and Scheme Comparison
International Conference on Control Engineering and Mechanical Design (CEMD 2017)
Assembly Modeling for Tolerance Analysis
International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011)
Personal Preassessment
Study Guide for Certification of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Professionals: Based on the ASME Y14.5.2-2000 and ASME Y14.5M-1994 Standards