Modifying the design of an existing system to meet the needs of a new task is a common activity in mechatronic system development. Often, engineers seek to meet requirements for the new task via control design changes alone, but in many cases new requirements are impossible to meet using control design only; physical system design modifications must be considered. Plant-limited co-design (PLCD) is a design methodology for meeting new requirements at minimum cost through limited physical system (plant) design changes in concert with control system redesign. The most influential plant changes are identified to narrow the set of candidate plant changes. PLCD provides quantitative evidence to support strategic plant design modification decisions, including tradeoff analyses of redesign cost and requirement violation. In this article the design of a counterbalanced robotic manipulator is used to illustrate successful PLCD application. A baseline system design is obtained that exploits synergy between manipulator passive dynamics and control to minimize energy consumption for a specific pick-and-place task. The baseline design cannot meet requirements for a second pick-and-place task through control design changes alone. A limited set of plant design changes is identified using sensitivity analysis, and the PLCD result meets the new requirements at a cost significantly less than complete system redesign.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2013
Research-Article
Plant-Limited Co-Design of an Energy-Efficient Counterbalanced Robotic Manipulator
James T. Allison
James T. Allison
1
Assistant Professor
Mem. ASME
e-mail: jtalliso@illinois.edu
Mem. ASME
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
,Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: jtalliso@illinois.edu
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
James T. Allison
Assistant Professor
Mem. ASME
e-mail: jtalliso@illinois.edu
Mem. ASME
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
,Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: jtalliso@illinois.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received May 15, 2012; final manuscript received June 1, 2013; published online August 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: James Schmiedeler.
J. Mech. Des. Oct 2013, 135(10): 101003 (10 pages)
Published Online: August 7, 2013
Article history
Received:
May 15, 2012
Revision Received:
June 1, 2013
Citation
Allison, J. T. (August 7, 2013). "Plant-Limited Co-Design of an Energy-Efficient Counterbalanced Robotic Manipulator." ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2013; 135(10): 101003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024978
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Stiffness of Cable-based Parallel Manipulators With Application to Stability Analysis
J. Mech. Des (January,2006)
Design and Control of a Compliant Parallel Manipulator
J. Mech. Des (December,2002)
An Energy Efficient Manipulator Design Approach: Application to a Leg in Swing Phase
J. Mech. Des (May,2007)
Solving the Geometric Design Problem of Spatial 3R Robot Manipulators Using Polynomial Homotopy Continuation
J. Mech. Des (December,2002)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
IWE and IWL
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
ASME Section III Division 4 Fusion Energy Devices Code Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Project Development Considerations
Consensus on Pre-Commissioning Stages for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants