Welded cylindrical containers are susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in the closure-weld area. An induction coil heating technique may be used to relieve the residual stresses in the closure-weld. This technique involves localized heating of the material by the surrounding coils. The material is then cooled to room temperature by quenching. A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model is developed to study the effects of induction coil heating and subsequent quenching. The finite element results are validated through an experimental test. The container design is tuned to maximize the compressive stress from the outer surface to a depth that is equal to the long-term general corrosion rate of the container material multiplied by the desired container lifetime. The problem is subject to several geometrical and stress constraints. Two different solution methods are implemented for this purpose. First, an off-the-shelf optimization software is used. The results however were unsatisfactory because of the highly nonlinear nature of the problem. The paper proposes a novel alternative: the Successive Heuristic Quadratic Approximation (SHQA) technique. This algorithm combines successive quadratic approximation with an adaptive random search within varying search space. SHQA promises to be a suitable search method for computationally intensive, highly nonlinear problems.

1.
Ceylan, Z., 2001, “Minimization of Residual Stresses in the Closure-weld Region of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Canisters Using Induction Annealing Process,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
2.
Avallone, E. A., and Baumeister, T., Eds., 1986, Mark’s Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Ninth Edition. pp. 7–63, McGraw Hill, New York.
3.
Umemoto, T., Yoshida, K., and Okamoto, A., 1980, “Residual Stress Improvement for Pipe Welds by Means of Induction Heating Pre-Flawed Pipe,” 4th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, Volume 1: Materials, Fracture and Fatigue, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, England, pp. 131–137.
4.
Chien
,
C.
,
Chen
,
H.
, and
Chiou
,
Y.
,
1989
, “
Estimation of Welding Residual Stresses by Using Simulated Inherent Strains
,”
Transactions of the Japan Welding Society
,
20
, pp.
52
59
.
5.
Wilkening
,
W. W.
, and
Snow
,
J. L.
,
1993
, “
Analysis of Welding-Induced Residual Stresses with the ADINA System
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
47
, pp.
767
786
.
6.
Schramm
,
U.
, and
Pilkey
,
W. D.
,
1993
, “
Coupling of Geometric Descriptions and Finite Elements Using NURBs—A Study in Shape Optimization
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Design
,
15
, pp.
11
34
.
7.
Gotsis
,
P. K.
,
1994
, “
Structural Optimization of Shell Structures
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
50
, pp.
499
507
.
8.
Tappeta
,
R. V.
, and
Renaud
,
J. E.
,
1997
, “
Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
119
, pp.
403
411
.
9.
Alexandrov
,
N. M.
,
Dennis
,
J. E.
,
Lewis
,
R. M.
, and,
Torczon
,
V.
,
1998
, “
A Trust Region Framework for Managing Use of Approximation Models in Optimization
,”
Struct. Optim.
,
15
, pp.
16
23
.
10.
Hardee
,
E.
,
Chang
,
K.
,
Tu Jian
,
C.
,
Kyung
,
K.
,
Grindeanu
,
I.
, and
Yu
,
X.
,
1999
, “
CAD-Based Design Parameterization for Shape Optimization of Elastic Solids
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
30
, pp.
185
199
.
11.
Wang
,
G. G.
,
Dong
,
Z. M.
, and
Aitchison
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Adaptive Response Surface Method-A Global Optimization Scheme for Approximation-Based Design Problems
,”
Engineering Optimization
,
33
, pp.
707
733
.
12.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, “Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method,” ASTM Designation: E 837-92.
13.
CRWMS M&O (Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System, Management and Operating Contractor), 2000, “Threshold Stress Level for Initiation of Stress Corrosion Cracking,” Input Tracking Number: WP-WP-00031.T, CRWMS M&O Input Transmittal Document.
14.
ANSYS, Inc., “Theory Reference, Section 20.7: Subproblem Approximation Method,” 2002.
15.
Rekalitis, G. V., Ravindran, A., and Ragsdell, K. M., 1983, Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, Wiley, New York.
16.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997, “Standard Specification for Low-Carbon Nickel-Molybdenum-Chromium, Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum, Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Copper and Low-Carbon Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Tungsten Alloy Plate, Sheet, and Strip,” ASTM Designation: B 575-97.
17.
Haynes International, 1997, Hastelloy C-22 Alloy, Haynes International, Kokomo, Indiana.
18.
American Society for Metals, 1980, “Properties and Selection: Stainless Steels, Tool Materials and Special-Purpose Metals,” Metals Handbook, Ninth Edition, Volume 3.
You do not currently have access to this content.