A new approach to fixture fault diagnosis, designated component analysis (DCA), is proposed for automotive body assembly systems using multivariate statistical analysis. Instead of estimating the fault patterns solely from the process data as in principal component analysis (PCA), DCA defines a set of mutually orthogonal vectors identified from known product/process knowledge to represent fault patterns, estimates their significance from data, and analyzes the correlation among the designated components. Hence, the sheet metal dimensional variation is mathematically decomposed into a series of mutually orthogonal rigid body motions with known patterns. Remaining deflections can be estimated by PCA after rigid body motions have been removed from the data. As a result, the designated components, along with their correlations, facilitate the diagnosis of multiple fixture faults that exist simultaneously and isolate deflections from other variation components. An application example is used to illustrate DCA’s effectiveness and potentials.

1.
Hu, S. J., and Wu, S. M., 1992, “Identifying Sources of Variation in Automobile Body Assembly and Using Principal Component Analysis,” Transaction of NAMRI/SME XX, pp. 311–316.
2.
Roan, C., Hu, S. J., and Wu, S. M., 1993, “Computer Aided Identification of Root Causes of Variation in Automobile Body Assembly,” Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 64, pp. 391–400, ASME WAM, New Orleans.
3.
Ceglarek
,
D.
,
Shi
,
J.
, and
Wu
,
S. M.
,
1994
, “
A Knowledge-Based Diagnosis Approach for the Launch of the Auto-Body Assembly Processes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
116
, pp.
491
499
.
4.
Ceglarek
,
D.
, and
Shi
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Fixture Failure Diagnosis for Autobody Assembly Using Pattern Recognition
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
118
, pp.
55
66
.
5.
Apley
,
D. W.
, and
Shi
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Diagnosis of Multiple Fixture Faults in Panel Assembly
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
120
, pp.
793
801
.
6.
Carlson, J. S., Lindkvist, L., and So¨derberg, R., 2000, “Multi-Fixture Assembly System Diagnosis Based On Part and Subassembly Measurement Data,” Proceedings of 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 10–13 September, 2000, Baltimore, MD, pp. 1–13.
7.
Jackson
,
J. E.
,
1980
, “
Principal Components and Factor Analysis: Part I—Principal Components
,”
J. Quality Technol.
,
12
, pp.
201
213
.
8.
Jackson
,
J. E.
,
1981
, “
Principal Components and Factor Analysis: Part II—Additional Topics Related to Principal Components
,”
J. Quality Technol.
,
13
, pp.
46
58
.
9.
Geladi
,
P.
, and
Kowalski
,
B. R.
,
1986
, “
Partial Least-Squares Regression: A Tutorial
,”
Anal. Chem.
,
185
, pp.
1
17
.
10.
Barton
,
R. R.
, and
Gonzalez-Barreto
,
D. R.
,
1996
, “
Process-Oriented Basis Representations for Multivariate Process Diagnostics
,”
Quality Eng.
,
9
, pp.
107
118
.
11.
Apley
,
D. W.
, and
Shi
,
J.
,
2001
, “
A Factor-Analysis Method for Diagnosing Variability in Multivariate Manufacturing Processes
,”
Technometrics
,
43
, pp.
84
95
.
12.
Carlson
,
J. S.
, and
So¨derberg
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Assembly Root Cause Analysis: A Way To Reduce Dimensional Variation In Assembled Products
,”
Int. J. Flexible Manuf. Syst.
,
15
, pp.
113
150
.
13.
Camelio, J. A., Hu, S. J., and Yim, H., 2003, “Sensor Placement for Effective Diagnosis of Multiple Faults in Fixture of Compliant Parts,” Proceeding of 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, DC, 16–21 November, pp. 1–8.
You do not currently have access to this content.