In this paper we propose a set of criteria to evaluate the performance of various parallel mechanism architectures for CNC machining applications. In the robotics literature mathematical formulations of qualities like manipulability, stiffness, and workspace volume have been proposed to evaluate the performance of general-purpose robots. Here we propose a set of performance measures that specifically address features of the machining process. We define precise notions of machine tool workspace, joint and link stiffness, and position and orientation manipulability. The performance of various existing 6 d.o.f. architectures are evaluated with these measures. The analytical methodology presented here, in combination with a graphics-based CAD software environment, can serve as a useful tool in the design of high-performance parallel mechanism machine tools. [S1087-1357(00)01804-9]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
machining, performance evaluation, parallel architectures, design engineering, industrial manipulators
Topics:
Architecture, Machine tools, Machining, Parallel mechanisms, Stiffness, Computer numerical control machine tools
1.
Stewart
,
D.
,
1966
, “
A platform with six degrees of freedom
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
180
, Part I, No.
15
, pp.
371
–
386
.
2.
Yoshikawa
,
T.
,
1985
, “
Manipulability of robotic mechanisms
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
4
, No.
2
, pp.
3
–
9
.
3.
Klein
,
C. A.
, and
Blaho
,
B.
,
1987
, “
Dexterity measures for the design and control of kinematically redundant manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
6
, No.
2
, pp.
72
–
83
.
4.
Stoughton
,
R.
, and
Arai
,
T.
,
1993
, “
A modified Stewart platform manipulator with improved dexterity
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
9
, No.
2
, pp.
166
–
173
.
5.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1988
, “
The optimum kinematic design of a planar three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
,
110
, pp.
35
–
41
.
6.
Salisbury
,
J. K.
, and
Craig
,
J. J.
,
1982
, “
Articulated hands: force control and kinematic issues
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
1
, No.
1
, pp.
4
–
17
.
7.
Park
,
F. C.
,
1995
, “
Optimal robot design and differential geometry
,”
Trans. ASME 50th Anniv. Special Issue
,
117
(B), pp.
87
–
92
.
8.
Duffy
,
J.
,
1990
, “
The fallacy of modern hybrid control theory that is based on ‘orthogonal complements’ of twist and wrench spaces
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
7
, No.
2
, pp.
139
–
144
.
9.
Park
,
F. C.
,
1995
, “
Distance metrics on the rigid-body motions with applications to mechanism design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, No.
1
, pp.
48
–
54
.
10.
Park
,
F. C.
, and
Kim
,
J. W.
,
1998
, “
Manipulability of closed kinematic chains
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
, No.
4
, pp.
542
–
548
.
11.
Griffis
,
M.
, and
Duffy
,
J.
,
1993
, “
Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
28
, No.
2
2
.
12.
Patterson
,
T.
, and
Lipkin
,
H.
,
1993
, “
Structure of robot compliance
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
, No.
3
, pp.
576
–
580
.
13.
Loncaric
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Normal forms of stiffness and compliance matrices
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
3
, No.
6
, pp.
567
–
572
.
14.
Bhattarchaya
,
S.
,
Hatwal
,
H.
, and
Ghosh
,
A.
,
1995
, “
On the optimum design of Stewart platform type parallel manipulators
,”
Robotica
,
13
, pp.
133
–
140
.
15.
Behi
,
F.
,
1988
, “
Kinematic analysis for a six degree-of-freedom 3-PRPS parallel mechanism
,”
IEEE J. Rob. Autom.
,
4
, No.
5
, pp.
561
–
565
.
16.
Valenti
,
M.
,
1995
, “
Machine tools get smarter
,”
ASME Mech. Eng.
,
117
, No.
11
, pp.
70
–
75
, November.
17.
Park, F. C., and Kim, J. W., 1999, “Singularity analysis of closed kinematic chains,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 121, No. 1 (to appear).
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.