A mesh partitioning strategy is presented which facilitates the application of boundary conditions to irregular shaped cooling channels in the pressure diecasting process. The strategy is used to partition a boundary element mesh, but can also be applied to the surface of a cooling channel bounded by a finite element mesh. The partitioning of the mesh into a series of element packs enables a one-dimensional flow model to be applied to the coolant. The flow model is used in conjunction with a steady-state thermal model which initially assumes that no boiling is taking place on the die/coolant interface. Values of bulk temperature, pressure, and velocity in the coolant are thus ascertained. This information, together with die temperatures, is then used in empirical relationships which model the various heat transfer mechanisms, including nucleate and transitional film boiling, between die and coolant. Effective heat transfer coefficients are calculated and applied at the die/coolant interface. The steady-state thermal code and the empirical boiling model are then used iteratively until stable values for the effective heat transfer coefficients are obtained. The models are tested by casting a small thin component using a die with conventional cooling channels and also using a novel die with irregular shaped cooling channels running on a hot chamber proprietary die casting machine. Simulation results are shown and experimental results using the hot chamber pressure die casting machine are reported. [S1087-1357(00)02302-9]

1.
Davey
,
K.
, and
Hinduja
,
S.
,
1990
, “
Modeling the Pressure Diecasting Process With the Boundary Element Method: Steady State Analysis
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
30
, pp.
1275
1299
.
2.
Clark, L. D., Rosindale, I., Davey, K., and Hinduja, S., 1997, “Predicting Heat Extraction Caused by Boiling in Cooling Channels During the Pressure Diecasting Process,” forwarded to Proc. IMechE Part C, J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
3.
Brebbia, C. A., 1978, The Boundary Element Method for Engineers, Pentech Press, London, Halstead, New York.
4.
Dijkstra
,
E. W.
,
1959
, “
A Note on Two Problems in Connection With Graphs
,”
Numer. Math.
,
1
, pp.
269
271
.
5.
Swamee
,
P. K.
, and
Jain
,
A. K.
,
1976
, “
Explicit Equations for Pipe-Flow Problems
,”
J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.
,
102
, pp.
657
664
.
6.
Kays, W. M., and Perkins, H. C., 1973, reprint from Standards of the Hydraulic Institute, in Handbook of Heat Transfer, 7–18, Rohsenow, W. M., and Hartnett, J. P., eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.
7.
Lapple
,
C. E.
,
1949
, “
Velocity Head Simplified Flow Computation
,”
Chem. Eng.
,
56
, pp.
91
138
8.
Dittus
,
F. W.
, and
Boelter
,
L. M. K.
,
1930
, “
Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators of the Tabular Type
,” University of California-Berkeley,
Pub. Eng.
2
, p.
443
443
.
9.
Bergles
,
A. E.
, and
Rohsenow
,
W. M.
,
1964
, “
The Determination of Forced-Convection Surface-Boiling Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
86
, pp.
365
372
.
10.
Gambill, W. R., 1962, Generalized prediction of burnout heat flux for flowing subcooled, wetting liquids, AIChE Preprint 17, 5th Nat. Heat Transfer Conf., Houston.
11.
Rohsenow
,
W. M.
,
1952
, “
A Method of Correlating Heat Transfer Data for Surface Boiling of Liquids
,”
Trans. ASME
,
74
, pp.
969
976
.
12.
Henry
,
R. E.
,
1974
, “
Correlation for the Minimum Film Boiling Temperature
,”
AIChE Symp. Ser.
,
70
, pp.
81
90
.
13.
Hammer
,
P. C.
, and
Stroud
,
A. H.
,
1956
, “
Numerical Integration Over Simplexes
,”
Math. Tables Aids Comp.
,
10
, pp.
137
139
.
14.
Eckert, E. R. G., and Drake, Jr. R. M., 1959, Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.