Design of tolerances impacts quality, cost, and cycle time of a product. Most literature on deterministic tolerance design has focused on developing exact and heuristic algorithms to minimize manufacturing cost. Some research has been published on probabilistic tolerance synthesis and optimization. This paper presents the design of experiments (DOE) approach for concurrent selection of component tolerances and the corresponding manufacturing processes. The objective is to minimize the variation of tolerance stackups. Numerical examples illustrate the methodology. The Monte Carlo simulation approach is used to obtain component tolerances and tolerance stackups. Process shift, the worst case and root sum square tolerance stackup constraints, and setup reduction constraints have been incorporated into the proposed methodology. Benefits of the proposed DOE approach over exact algorithms are discussed. [S1087-1357(00)00202-1]

1.
Nair
,
V.
, ed.,
1992
, “
Taguchi’s Parameter Design: A Panel Discussion
,”
Technometrics
,
34
, No.
2
, pp.
127
161
.
2.
Kackar
,
R.
,
1985
, “
Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method (with discussions)
,”
J. Quality Technol.
,
17
, No.
4
, pp.
176
188
.
3.
Jeang
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Tolerance Design: Choosing Optimal Tolerance Specifications in the Design of Machined Parts
,”
Qua. Reliab. Eng. In.
,
10
, No.
1
, pp.
27
35
.
4.
Soderberg, R., 1994, “Robust Design by Tolerance Allocation Considering Quality and Manufacturing Cost,” Adv. Design Autom., DE-Vol. 69-1 ASME New York, pp. 219–226.
5.
Kapur, K., 1993, “Taguchi Methods and Tolerance Design,” Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, A. Kusiak, ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 287–306.
6.
Tsui
,
K.-L.
,
1992
, “
An Overview of Taguchi Method and Newly Developed Statistical Methods for Robust Design
,”
IIE Trans.
,
24
, No.
5
, pp.
44
57
.
7.
Montgomery, D., 1997, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed., Wiley, New York.
8.
Box
,
G.
,
Bisgaard
,
S.
, and
Fung
,
C.
,
1988
, “
An Explanation and Critique of the Taguchi’s Contributions to Quality Engineering
,”
Qua. Reliability Eng. Int.
,
4
, No.
2
, pp.
123
131
.
9.
Pignatiello
, Jr.,
J.
, and
Ramberg
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Top Ten Triumphs and Tragedies of Genichi Taguchi
,”
Quality Eng.
,
4
, No.
2
, pp.
211
225
.
10.
Leo´n
,
R.
,
Shoemaker
,
A.
, and
Kackar
,
R.
,
1987
, “
Performance Measurements Independent of Adjustment, an Explanation and Extension of Taguchi’s Signal-to-Noise Ratios (with discussions)
,”
Technometrics
,
29
, No.
3
, pp.
253
265
.
11.
Steinberg
,
D.
, and
Hunter
,
W.
,
1984
, “
Experimental Design: Review and Comment (with discussion)
,”
Technometrics
,
26
, No.
1
, pp.
71
130
.
12.
Montgomery
,
D.
,
1992
, “
The Use of Statistical Process Control and Design of Experiments in Product and Process Improvement
,”
IIE Trans.
,
24
, No. (
5
), pp.
4
17
.
13.
Voelcker, H., 1993, “A Current Perspective on Tolerancing and Metrology,” Proceedings of the 1993 International Forum on Dimensional Tolerancing and Metrology, V. Srinivasan and H. Voelcker, eds., CRTD-Vol. 27, ASME, New York, pp. 49–60.
14.
Zhang
,
H.
, and
Huq
,
M.
,
1992
, “
Tolerance Techniques: The State-of-the-Art
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
30
, No.
9
, pp.
2111
2135
.
15.
Chase
,
K.
, and
Parkinson
,
A.
,
1991
, “
A Survey of Research in the Application of Tolerance Analysis for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection
,”
Res. Eng. Des. Theory, Appl. Conc. Eng.
,
1
, No.
3
, pp.
23
37
.
16.
Wu
,
Z.
,
Elmaraghy
,
W.
, and
Elmaraghy
,
H.
,
1988
, “
Evaluation of Cost-Tolerance Algorithms for Design Tolerance Analysis and Synthesis
,”
Manuf. Rev.
,
1
, No.
3
, pp.
168
179
.
17.
Ostwald
,
P.
, and
Huang
,
J.
,
1977
, “
A Method for Optimal Tolerance Selection
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
109
, No.
4
, pp.
558
565
.
18.
Lee
,
W.-J.
, and
Woo
,
T.
,
1989
, “
Optimum Selection of Discrete Tolerances
,”
ASME J. Mech. Trans. Autom. Des.
,
111
, No.
2
, pp.
243
251
.
19.
Chase
,
K.
,
Greenwood
,
W.
,
Loosli
,
B.
, and
Hauglund
,
L.
,
1990
, “
Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection
,”
Manuf. Eng.
,
3
, No.
1
, pp.
49
59
.
20.
Greenwood
,
W.
, and
Chase
,
K.
,
1988
, “
Worst Case Tolerance Analysis with Nonlinear Problem
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
110
, No.
3
, pp.
232
235
.
21.
Cagan, J., and Kurfess, T., 1992, “Optimal Tolerance Allocation Over Multiple Manufacturing Alternatives,” Advances in Design Automation, Vol. 1, ASME, New York, pp. 165–172.
22.
Doydum
,
C.
, and
Perreira
,
N.
,
1992
, “
Use of Monte Carlo Simulation to Select Dimensions, Tolerances, and Precision for Automated Assembly
,”
SME J. Manuf. Syst.
,
10
, No.
3
, pp.
209
222
.
23.
Evans
,
D.
,
1974
, “
Statistical Tolerancing: The State of Art. Part I: Background
,”
J. Quality Technol.
,
6
, No.
4
, pp.
188
195
.
24.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
, No.
1
, pp.
74
80
.
25.
Belegundu
,
A.
, and
Zhang
,
S.
,
1992
, “
Robustness of Design through Minimum Sensitivity
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
, No.
2
, pp.
213
217
.
26.
Kusiak
,
A.
, and
Feng
,
C.-X.
,
1996
, “
Robust Tolerance Design for Quality
,”
Trans. ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
118
, No.
1
, pp.
166
169
.
27.
Peat, A., 1968, Cost Reduction Charts for Designers and Production Engineers, The Machinery Publishing Company Ltd., Brighton, England.
28.
Girth, R., 1999, “Minimum Cost Tolerancing Under Uncertain Cost Estimates,” Technical Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ohio University, Athens, OH (to be published in Emerging Trends in Quality Engineering Special Issue of the IIE Transactions on Quality and Reliability Engineering).
29.
Larry, J. H., and Lawson, J. R., 1992, Six Sigma Producibility Analysis and Process Charaterization, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
30.
Montgomery, D., 1996, Introduction to Statistical Process Control, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York.
31.
Kane
,
V. E.
,
1986
, “
Process Capability Indices
,”
J. Quality Technol.
,
18
, pp.
41
52
.
32.
Kotz, S., and Johnson, N. L., 1993, Process Capability Indices, Chapman & Hall, London.
33.
Tipnis, V., 1992, “Tolerance and Deviation Information,” Tolerance and Deviation Information, CRTD-15-1, ASME, New York, pp. 5–24.
34.
Shingo, S., 1985, A Revolution in Manufacturing: The Single Minute Exchange of Die System, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
35.
Feng
,
C-X.
, and
Kusiak
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Robust Tolerance Design with the Integer Programming Approach
,”
Trans. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
119
, No.
4A
, pp.
603
610
.
36.
Feng
,
C-X.
, and
Kusiak
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Scheduling Models for Setup Reduction
,”
Trans. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
119
, No.
4A
, pp.
571
579
.
37.
Monte, M., and Datseris, P., 1982, “Optimum Tolerance Selection for Minimum Manufacturing Cost and Other Design Criteria,” ASME Technical Paper, 82-DET-35, pp. 1–9.
38.
Craig, M., 1988, “Variation by Design,” Mech. Eng., November, pp. 52–54.
39.
Fuscaldo, J. P., 1991, “Optimizing Collect Chuck Designs Using Variation Simulation Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 911639, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, August.
40.
Sitko, A. G., 1991, “Applying Variation Simulation Analysis to 2-D Problems,” SAE Technical Paper 910210, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, February.
41.
VSA, http://www.vsa.com.
42.
Taguchi, G., and Clausing, D., 1990, “Robust Quality,” Harvard Bus. Rev., January–February, pp. 65–75.
43.
Kackar
,
R.
, and
Shoemaker
,
A.
,
1985
, “
Robust Design: A Cost-Effective Method for Improving Manufacturing Process
,”
AT & T Tech. J.
,
65
, No.
2
, pp.
39
50
.
44.
Ishikawa, K., 1985, What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way, Translated by David J. Lu, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
45.
Bedworth, D. D., Henderson, M. R., and Wolfe, P. M., 1991, Computer-Integrated Design and Manufacturing, McGraw-Hill, New York.
46.
Kusiak, A., 1999, Engineering Design: Products, Processes and Systems, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
You do not currently have access to this content.