Abstract

The present study is focused on evaluating the moisture susceptibility of polymerized stone matrix asphalt (SMA) mixtures using moist aggregates and three different warm mix asphalt (WMA) additives. Indirect tensile strength (ITS), tensile strength ratio (TSR), deformation, and toughness were performed to determine the moisture sensitivity of these mixtures. The experimental design included two aggregate moisture contents (0% and ∼0.5% by weight of dry mass of the aggregate), three sources of aggregates (A, B, and C) and three WMA additives (Asphamin, Sasobit, and Evotherm) along with control mixture, and four different types of binders (i.e., PG 64-22 + 10% crumb rubber (−40 mesh CR), PG 64-22 + 15% CR, PG 64-22 + 20% CR, and PG 76-22 with fibers) were used in this study. In total, 384 samples were utilized for the ITS testing in this study. Test results indicated that even though by using 2% hydrated lime as an anti-stripping agent, 32% of the mixtures failed to meet the TSR requirement of 85% as per SCDOT specifications. Mixtures with PG 76-22 + fibers showed improved wet ITS values compared to rubberized SMA mixtures as using moist aggregates. No significant differences in the wet deformation values were observed for mixtures using WMA additives using moist aggregates. Mixtures with 15% CR content showed improved resistance to the percent toughness loss under a warm water bath treatment. Test results indicated that recycled rubberized asphalt binder can be effectively used to improve resistance to moisture-induced damage of SMA mixtures as using WMA technology.

References

1.
Brown
,
E. R.
,
Haddock
,
J. E.
, and
Crawford
,
C.
, “
Investigation of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mortars
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1530
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1996
, pp.
95
102
.
2.
National Asphalt Pavement Association
, “
Designing and Constructing SMA Mixtures-State-of-the Practice
,”
Quality Improvement Series 122
,
Lanham
,
MD
,
2002
.
3.
Brown
,
E. R.
,
Mallick
,
R. B.
,
Haddock
,
J. E.
, and
Lynn
,
T. A.
, “
Development of a Mixture Design Procedure for Stone Matrix Asphalt
,”
J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol.
, Vol.
66
,
1997
, pp.
1
30
.
4.
Prowell
,
B. D.
,
Cooley
,
L. A.
, Jr.
, and
Schreck
,
R. J.
, “
Virginia’s Experience with 9.5-mm Nominal-Maximum-Aggregate-Size Stone Matrix Asphalt
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1813
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2002
, pp.
133
141
.
5.
Mogawer
,
W. S.
, and
Stuart
,
K. D.
, “
Evaluation of Stone Matrix Asphalt Versus Dense-Graded Mixtures
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1454
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C
,
1994
, pp.
58
65
.
6.
Stuart
,
K. D.
, and
Malmquist
,
P.
, “
Evaluation of Using Different Stabilizers in the U.S Route 15 (Maryland) Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA)
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1454
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1994
, pp.
48
57
.
7.
Watson
,
D. E.
,
Masad
,
E.
,
Moore
,
K. A.
,
Williams
,
K.
, and
Cooley
,
L. A.
, “
Verification of VCA Testing to Determine Stone-on-Stone Contact of HMA Mixtures
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1891
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2004
, pp.
182
190
.
8.
West
,
R. C.
,
Moore
,
J. R.
,
Jared
,
D. M.
, and
Wu
,
P. Y.
, “
Evaluating Georgia’s Compaction Requirements for Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures
,”
Transportation Research Record. 2001
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2007
, pp.
93
101
.
9.
Brown
,
E. R.
, and
Mallick
,
R. B.
, “
Laboratory Study on Draindown of Asphalt Cement in Stone Matrix Asphalt
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1513
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1995
, pp.
25
38
.
10.
Butz
,
T.
,
Rahimian
,
I.
, and
Hildebrand
,
G.
, “
Modifications of Rd. Bitumens with the Fischer-Tropsch Paraffin Sasobit
,”
J. Appl. Asphalt Binder Technol.
, Vol.
1
, No.
2
,
2001
, pp.
70
86
.
11.
Hurley
,
G.
, and
Prowell
,
B.
, “
Evaluation of Sasobit for use in Warm Mix Asphalt
,” NCAT Report No. 05-06, Auburn, AL,
2005
.
12.
Hurley
,
G.
, and
Prowell
,
B.
, “
Evaluation of Aspha-Min for use in Warm Mix Asphalt
,” NCAT Report No. 05-04, Auburn, AL,
2005
.
13.
U. S. Dept. of Transportation, “
Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies and Research
,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C,
2005
, www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/wma.cfm (Last accessed October 15,
2010
).
14.
Barthel
,
W.
,
Marchand
,
J. P
, and
Von Devivere
,
M
, “
Warm Asphalt Mixes by Adding a Synthetic Zeolite
,”
2007
, http://www.asphamin.de/de/0310_warm_mixes_wit_zeolites.pdf (Last accessed October 15, 2010).
15.
Hurley
,
G.
, and
Prowell
,
B.
, “
Evaluation of Evotherm for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt
,” NCAT Report No. 06-02, Auburn, AL,
2006
.
16.
Wasiuddin
,
N. M.
,
Selvamohan
,
S.
,
Zaman
,
M. M.
, and
Guegan
,
M. L. T. A.
, “
Comparative Laboratory Study of Sasobit and Aspha-Min Additives in Warm-Mix Asphalt
,”
Transportation Research Record. 1998
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2007
, pp.
82
88
.
17.
Gandhi
,
T. S.
,
2008
, “
Effects of Warm Asphalt Additives on Asphalt Binder and Mixture Properties
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
Clemson Univ.
, Clemson, SC.
18.
Prowell
,
B.
, “
Warm Mix Asphalt
The International Technology Scanning Program Summary Report,
2007
, http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/wma/summary.cfm (Last accessed October 15, 2010).
19.
AASHTO, “
Standard Specification for Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA)
,” Designation: M 325, Washington, D.C.,
2008
.
20.
Xiao
,
F. P.
, and
Amirkhanian
,
S. N.
, “
Laboratory Investigation of Moisture Damage in Rubberized Asphalt Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
,”
Int. J. Pavement Eng.
, Vol.
10
, No.
5
,
2009
, pp.
319
328
. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802169432
21.
Bahia
,
H. U.
, and
Davis
,
R.
, “
Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifier (CRM) on Performance Related Properties of Asphalt Binders
,”
J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol.
, Vol.
63
,
1994
, pp.
414
449
.
22.
Xiao
,
F.
,
Amirkhanian
,
S.
, and
Putman
B.
, “
Evaluation of Rutting Resistance in Warm Mix Asphalts Containing Moist Aggregate
,”
Transportation Research Record. 2180
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2010
, pp.
75
84
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.