Abstract

Fracture toughness (KJ (cleavage)) measurements made within the ductile-to-brittle transition region for ferritic pressure vessel steels are not always described by the shape of the Master Curve currently given in ASTM Standard E 1921. The objective of this paper is to show how the shape of the transition toughness curve may be related to the shape of the material's resistance to crack extension curve (KJR) once the crack tip starts to blunt and ductile crack extension precedes cleavage failure. Using an empirical relationship between the mean ductile crack extension (Δa) prior to the onset of cleavage failure and temperature (Δa=λ exp(ϕT)), then the relationship between KJ and T may simply be given by KJ=KA+α[λ exp(ϕT)]β, where KA, α, and β are simply the coefficients to an offset power law to KJ versus Δa data given by KJR=KA+α(Δa)β. For specimens of different sizes, a reference temperature TK may be defined for a given reference level of Δa or equivalent KJ. Unique curves may be defined for materials with differing crack extension resistance curves through plots of KJ versus (T−TΔa(ref)) or (T−TK(ref)). The generalized form of the transition curve may be given by KJ=KA+α{Δa(ref) exp[ϕ(T−TΔa(ref) >β or KJ=KA+(K(ref)KA){exp[ϕ(T−TK(ref) >β. Experimentally, ϕ has been estimated as approximately 0.08 for nuclear pressure vessel materials such as A533B/A508. Using a specific situation wherein the value of KA=30MPam,K(ref)=100MPam, and β=0.25 then, for a B=25-mm specimen, within experimental scatter this provides an almost exact match to the Master Curve given by KJ=30+70 exp[0.019(T−TK100)]. The predictions of transition curve shape using the material's resistance to crack extension curve are believed to be complementary to the Master Curve method, and may describe the shape of the transition curve when there is ductile crack extension prior to cleavage failure. Further work is recommended to investigate the relationship between the predicted ductile-to-brittle transition curve and the Master Curve for probabilities of cleavage failure post-initiation.

References

1.
Shuter
D. M.
,
Geary
W.
,
Dutton
J. T.
,
Birkett
R. P.
, and
Wardle
G.
, “
Summary Report on Fracture Toughness Testing and Analysis Methodologies for Miniaturised Specimens of Ferritic Steels; HSE Sponsored Joint Industry Programme 1999–2002
,”
Health and Safety Laboratory
Report, HSL MM/ 02/28,
05
2003
. Available (through HSL) on CD.
2.
Shuter
D. M.
,
Dutton
J. T.
,
Hobbs
J. W.
,
Geary
W.
,
Birkett
R. P.
, and
Wardle
G.
, “
Miniature Specimen Fracture Toughness Testing and Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment
, held at the
Manchester Conference Centre UMIST, UK
, 8–9 October 2002, pp.
243
251
;
Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment: Needs and Provision
,
P. E. J.
Flewitt
et al, Eds.,
EMAS publications
,
Sheffield
,
2002
.
3.
Wardle
G.
,
Geary
W.
,
Dutton
J. T.
, and
Shuter
D.
, “
Influence of Specimen Size on the Fracture Toughness of Pressure Vessel Steels Within the Ductile to Brittle Transition Regime
,”
Proceedings of the UK Forum for Engineering Structural Integrity: Seventh International Conference on Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment
, held at the
Manchester Conference Centre UMIST, UK
, 20–21 October 2004, pp.
259
268
;
Integrity for Life: Structural Integrity Assessment for Life Cycle Management
,
P. E. J.
Flewitt
et al, Eds.,
EMAS publications
,
Sheffield
,
2004
.
4.
Ingham
T.
,
Knee
N.
,
Milne
I.
, and
Morland
E.
, “
Fracture Toughness in the Transition Regime for A533B-1 Steel: Prediction of Large Specimen Results From Small Specimen Tests
,”
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
Report, UKAEA–ND-R-1354(R),
07
1987
.
5.
Heerens
J.
and
Hellmann
D.
, “
Development of the Euro Fracture Toughness Dataset
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
 0013-7944, Vol.
69
,
2002
, pp.
421
449
.
6.
Lidbury
D.
and
Moskovic
R.
, “
Assessment of Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Toughness Behaviour of an A508 Class 3 PWR Pressure Vessel Steel by a Statistical Approach
,” ASME Pressure and Piping Conference, PVP-Vol.
250
,
1993
, pp.
283
294
.
7.
ASTM Standard E-1921: 97, “
Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, TO for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
03.01
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshocken, PA
,
2000
.
8.
Ortner
S. R.
, “
Outstanding Issues in Master Curve Applications
,” in
Use and applications of the master curve for determining fracture toughness
, Master Curve Workshop,
K.
Wallin
, Ed.,
Helsinki
, 12–14, June, 2002.
9.
Ortner
S. R.
Factors Affecting the Shape of the Ductile-to-Brittle Transition
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
 0308-0161, Vol.
79
,
2002
, pp.
693
700
.
10.
Wright
K.
and
Swankie
T.
, “
Statistical Assessment of Fracture Toughness Data From High Pressure Storage Vessel Material
,”
Advantica Technology (Formerly British Gas Research)
Report No. R4515,
03
2002
.
11.
Wardle
G.
, Report in preparation.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.