Abstract

Lack of existing fundamental mechanistic tests to evaluate performance potential of HMA mixtures has given rise to a number of empirical and mechanical-empirical test procedures. In an effort to understand how one of these tests, the Hamburg rutting test, was impacted by differences in HMA mixture variables, the following experimental work was conducted. Three aggregate types consisting of a crushed granite, a crushed siliceous gravel, and a crushed limestone were evaluated at four design ESAL levels. These four ESAL levels were 300 000, 1 million, 3 million, and 10 million. For each of these aggregate types and ESAL levels, 5 PG graded binders were investigated. The binders were PG 58-28, PG 64-28C (chemically modified), PG 64-28P, PG 64-34, and PG 70-28; the latter 3 binders were polymer modified. For all mixtures, Hamburg Wheel Tracking tests were performed under water at 50°C. In addition, a DSR Creep Test developed at MTE was performed on each mixture at 58°C and 34 kPa stress to determine the dry strength characteristics. The Hamburg test showed consistently better results as the ESAL level of the mix increased and as the high temperature PG grade of the binder increased for a given base asphalt. In the Hamburg test, mixes produced with PG 64-34 did not perform as well as PG 70-28 or PG 64-28P, while in the DSR Creep Test, mixes produced with PG 64-34 performed significantly better than PG 64-28P. This leads to speculation that the modulus of the base asphalt plays a more significant role in stress applied moisture resistance tests and that dry high temperature permanent deformation tests are influenced by the modified binder properties.

References

1.
Cooley
,
L. A.
 Jr.
,
Kandhal
,
P.
,
Buchanan
,
Shane, M.
,
Fee
,
F.
, and
Epps
,
A.
, “
Loaded Wheel Testers in the United States: State of the Practice
,”
Transportation Research E-Circular
, Number E-C016,
07
2000
, 21 pp.
2.
Aschenbrener
,
T.
,
McGennis
,
R. B.
, and
Terrel
,
R. L.
, “
Comparison of Several Moisture Susceptibility Tests to Pavements of Known Field Performance
,”
Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists
, Vol.
64
,
1995
, pp.
163
-
208
.
3.
Romero
,
P.
and
Stuart
,
K.
, “
Evaluating Accelerated Rut Testers
,” Turner Fairbanks Website, at http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/julaug98/evaluating.htm, viewed on
24
05
2003
.
4.
Aschenbrener
,
T.
, “
Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device to Predict Moisture Damage in Hot-Mix Asphalt
,”
Transportation Research Record 1492-Hot-Mix Asphalt Design, Testing, Evaluation and Performance
,
1995
, pp.
193
-
201
.
5.
Izzo
,
R.
, and
Tahmoressi
,
M.
, “
Testing Repeatability of the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device and Replicating Wheel-Tracking Devices Among Different Laboratories
,”
Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists
, Vol.
68
,
1999
, pp.
589
-
612
.
6.
Mohammad
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Huang
,
B.
, and
Tan
,
Z.
, “
Laboratory Performance Evaluation SMA, CMHB, and Dense Graded Asphalt Mixtures
,”
Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists
, Vol.
68
,
1999
, pp.
252
-
283
.
7.
Reinke
,
G.
, and
Dai
,
S.
, “
Performance Properties of Three Mixes Constructed at the MNROAD Test Site
,”
Canadian Technical Asphalt Association Proceedings
, Vol.
XLVI
,
2001
, pp.
213
-
248
8.
Reinke
,
G.
and
Glidden
,
S.
, “
Development of Mixture Creep Performance Tests Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer
,” An invited presentation for Session 300 at the
2002 Transportation Research Board meeting
,
TRB E-Circular E-C068 New Simple Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixes
,
09
2004
,
Transportation Research Board
.
9.
Bahia
,
H. U.
,
Hanson
,
D. I.
,
Zeng
,
M.
,
Zhai
,
H.
,
Khatri
,
M. A.
, and
Anderson
,
R. M.
, “
NCHRP Report 459: Charcterization of Modified Asphalt Binders in Superpave Mix Design
,”
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
2001
, pp.
49
-
59
.
10.
Witczak
,
M. W.
,
Kaloush
,
K.
,
Pellinen
,
T.
,
El-Basyouny
,
M.
, and
Von Quintus
,
H.
, “
NCHRP Report 465: Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design
,”
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
,
2002
, p. 10.
11.
Romero
,
P.
and
Anderson
,
R. M.
, “
Variability of Asphalt Mixture Tests Using Superpave Shear Tester Repeated Shear at Constant Height Test
,”
Transportation Research Record 1767—Asphalt Mixtures
,
2001
, pp.
95
-
101
.
12.
Stuart
,
K. D.
,
Youtcheff
,
J. S.
, and
Mogawer
,
W. S.
, “
Understanding the Performance of Modified Asphalt Binders in Mixtures: Evaluation of Moisture Sensitivity
,”
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project
 90-07, FHWA-RD-02-029,
11
12
2001
.
13.
Rand
,
D. A.
, “
HMA Moisture Sensitivity: Past, Present, and Future TxDOT Experiences
,”
Moisture Damage Symposium
,
Western Research Institute
, July 17–19, 2002,
Laramie, WY
. Available at: http://www.westernresearch.org/content/technology_areas/asphalt_materials/MDSymp.shtml.
14.
Phillips
,
M. C.
and
Robertus
,
C.
, “
Binder Rheology and Asphaltic Pavement Permanent Deformation: The Zero Shear Viscosity
,”
First Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress
,
Strasbourg
,
1996
, Paper No. 5.134.
15.
Sybiliski
,
D.
, “
Zero Shear Viscosity of Bituminous Binder and Its Relation to Bituminous Mixtures Rutting Resistance
,” Transportation Research Record 1535,
TRB
,
1996
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.