Experiments and computations are presented to quantify the convective heat transfer and the hydraulic loss that is obtained by forcing water through blocks of graphitic foam (GF) heated from one side. Experiments have been conducted in a small-scale water tunnel instrumented to measure the pressure drop and the temperature rise of water passing through the foam and the base temperature and heat flux into the foam block. The experimental data were then used to calibrate a thermal non-equilibrium finite-volume model to facilitate comparisons between GF and aluminum foam. Comparisons of the pressure drop indicate that both normal and compressed aluminum foams are significantly more permeable than GF. Results of the heat transfer indicate that the maximum possible heat dissipation from a given surface is reached using very thin layers of aluminum foam due to the inability of the foam to entrain heat into its internal structure. In contrast, graphitic foam is able to entrain heat deep into the foam structure due to its high extended surface efficiency and thus much more heat can be transferred from a given surface area. The higher extended surface efficiency is mainly due to the combination of moderate porosity and higher solid-phase conductivity.

1.
Klett
,
W. J.
,
Hardy
,
R.
,
Romine
,
E.
,
Walls
,
C.
, and
Burchell
,
T.
, 2000, “
High-Thermal Conductivity, Mesophase-Pitch-Derived Carbon Foam: Effect of Precursor on Structure and Properties
,”
Carbon
0008-6223,
38
, pp.
953
973
.
2.
Gallego
,
C. N.
, and
Klett
,
W. J.
, 2003, “
Carbon Foams for Thermal Management
,”
Carbon
0008-6223,
41
, pp.
1461
1466
.
3.
Paek
,
W. J.
,
Kang
,
H. B.
,
Kim
,
Y. S.
, and
Hyum
,
M. J.
, 2000, “
Effective Thermal Conductivity and Permeability of Aluminum Foam Materials
,”
Int. J. Thermophys.
0195-928X,
21
(
2
), pp.
453
464
.
4.
Antohe
,
B. V.
,
Lage
,
J. L.
,
Price
,
D. C.
, and
Weber
,
R. M.
, 1997, “
Experimental Determination of Permeability and Inertia Coefficients of Mechanically Compressed Aluminum Porous Matrices
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
119
, pp.
404
412
.
5.
Boomsma
,
K.
, and
Poulikakos
,
D.
, 2002, “
The Effects of Compression and Pore Size Variations on the Liquid Flow Characteristics in Metal Foams
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
263
272
.
6.
Calmidi
,
V. V.
, and
Mahajan
,
R. L.
, 2000, “
Forced Convection in High Porosity Metal Foams
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
122
, pp.
557
565
.
7.
Boomsma
,
K.
,
Poulikakos
,
D.
, and
Zwick
,
F.
, 2003, “
Metal Foams as Compact High Performance Heat Exchangers
,”
Mech. Mater.
0167-6636,
35
, pp.
1161
1176
.
8.
Yu
,
Q.
,
Thompson
,
B. E.
, and
Straatman
,
A. G.
, 2006, “
A Unit-Cube Based Model for Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Porous Carbon Foam
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
128
, pp.
352
360
.
9.
Betchen
,
L. J.
,
Straatman
,
A. G.
, and
Thompson
,
B. E.
, 2006, “
A Non-Equilibrium Finite-Volume Model for Conjugate Fluid/Porous/Solid Domains
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A
1040-7782,
49
, pp.
543
565
.
10.
Incropera
,
M.
, and
Dewitt
,
F.
, 2003,
Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer
,
Wiley
, New York.
11.
Straatman
,
A. G.
,
Gallego
,
N. C.
,
Yu
,
Q.
, and
Thompson
,
B. E.
, 2006, “
Characterization of Porous Carbon Foam as a Material for Compact Recuperators
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90598,
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2006
, Barcelona, Spain, May.
12.
Taylor
,
G. I.
, 1971, “
A Model for the Boundary Condition of a Porous Material. Part 1
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
49
, pp.
319
326
.
You do not currently have access to this content.