Dynamic electrical resistance during resistance spot welding has been quantitatively modeled and analyzed in this work. A determination of dynamic resistance is necessary for predicting the transport processes and monitoring the weld quality during resistance spot welding. In this study, dynamic resistance is obtained by taking the sum of temperature-dependent bulk resistance of the workpieces and contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface within an effective area corresponding to the electrode tip where welding current primarily flows. A contact resistance is composed of constriction and film resistances, which are functions of hardness, temperature, electrode force, and surface conditions. The temperature is determined from the previous study in predicting unsteady, axisymmetric mass, momentum, heat, species transport, and magnetic field intensity with a mushy-zone phase change in workpieces, and temperature and magnetic fields in the electrodes of different geometries. The predicted nugget thickness and dynamic resistance versus time show quite good agreement with available experimental data. Excluding expulsion, the dynamic resistance curve can be divided into four stages. A rapid decrease of dynamic resistance in stage 1 is attributed to decreases in contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface. In stage 2, the increase in dynamic resistance results from the primary increase of bulk resistance in the workpieces and an increase of the sum of contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface. Dynamic resistance in stage 3 decreases, because increasing rate of bulk resistance in the workpieces and contact resistances decrease. In stage 4 the decrease of dynamic resistance is mainly due to the formation of the molten nugget at the faying surface. The molten nugget is found to occur in stage 4 rather than stage 2 or 3 as qualitatively proposed in the literature. The effects of different parameters on the dynamic resistance curve are also presented.

Issue Section:
Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes
Keywords:
contact resistance, hardness, heat transfer, resistance welding, Contact Resistance, Electric Fields, Heat Transfer, Manufacturing
Topics:
Contact resistance, Electrodes, Temperature, Welding, Electrical resistance, Boundary-value problems
1.
Nied
,
H. A.
,
1984
, “
The Finite Element Modelling of the Resistance Spot Welding Process
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
63
, pp.
123s–132s
123s–132s
.
2.
Tsai
,
C. L.
,
Jammal
,
O. A.
,
Papritan
,
J. C.
, and
Dickinson
,
D. W.
,
1992
, “
Modeling of Resistance Spot Weld Nugget Growth
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
71
, pp.
47s–54s
47s–54s
.
3.
Roberts
,
W. L.
,
1951
, “
Resistance Variations During Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
30
, pp.
1004
–
1019
.
4.
Bhattacharya
,
S.
, and
Andrews
,
D. R.
,
1974
, “
Significance of Dynamic Resistance Curves in the Theory and Practice of Spot Welding
,”
Welding and Metal Fabrication
,
42
, pp.
296
–
301
.
5.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1958
, “
Electrical Conduction in Solids. II. Theory of Temperature-Dependent Conductors
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London
,
246
, pp.
13
–
31
.
6.
Wei
,
P. S.
,
Wang
,
S. C.
, and
Lin
,
M. S.
,
1996
, “
Transport Phenomena During Resistance Spot Welding
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
118
, pp.
762
–
773
.
7.
Savage
,
W. F.
,
Nippes
,
E. F.
, and
Wassell
,
F. A.
,
1978
, “
Dynamic Contact Resistance of Series Spot Welds
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
57
, pp.
43s–50s
43s–50s
.
8.
Dickinson
,
D. W.
,
Franklin
,
J. E.
, and
Stanya
,
A.
,
1980
, “
Characterization of Spot Welding Behavior by Dynamic Electrical Parameter Monitoring
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
59
, pp.
170s–176s
170s–176s
.
9.
Gedeon
,
S. A.
, and
Eagar
,
T. W.
,
1986
, “
Resistance Spot Welding of Galvanized Steel: Part II—Mechanisms of Spot Weld Nugget Formation
,”
Metall. Trans. B
,
17B
, pp.
887
–
901
.
10.
Gedeon
,
S. A.
,
Sorensen
,
C. D.
,
Ulrich
,
K. T.
, and
Eagar
,
T. W.
,
1987
, “
Measurement of Dynamic Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Resistance Spot Welds
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
66
, pp.
378s–385s
378s–385s
.
11.
Studer
,
F. J.
,
1939
, “
Contact Resistance in Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
18
, pp.
374s–380s
374s–380s
.
12.
Kouwenhoven
,
W. B.
, and
Tampico
,
J.
,
1941
, “
Surface Polish and Contact Resistance
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
20
, pp.
468s–471s
468s–471s
.
13.
Tylecote
,
R. F.
,
1941
, “
Spot Welding, Part III: Contact Resistance
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
20
, pp.
591s–602s
591s–602s
.
14.
Kaiser
,
J. G.
,
Dunn
,
G. J.
, and
Eagar
,
T. W.
,
1982
, “
The Effect of Electrical Resistance on Nugget Formation during Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
61
, pp.
167s–174s
167s–174s
.
15.
Vogler
,
M.
, and
Sheppard
,
S.
,
1993
, “
Electrical Contact Resistance under High Loads and Elevated Temperatures
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
72
, pp.
231s–238s
231s–238s
.
16.
Thornton
,
P. H.
,
Krause
,
A. R.
, and
Davies
,
R. G.
,
1996
, “
Contact Resistances in Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
75
, pp.
402s–412s
402s–412s
.
17.
James
,
P. S.
,
Chandler
,
H. W.
,
Evans
,
J. T.
,
Wen
,
J.
,
Browne
,
D. J.
, and
Newton
,
C. J.
,
1997
, “
The Effect of Mechanical Loading on the Contact Resistance of Coated Aluminum
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
,
A230
, pp.
194
–
201
.
18.
Holm, R., 1967, Electric Contacts, Theory and Application, 4th edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
19.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
,
1966
, “
Constriction Resistance and the Real Area of Contact
,”
British J. Applied Physics
,
17
, pp.
1621
–
1632
.
20.
Crinon
,
E.
, and
Evans
,
J. T.
,
1998
, “
The Effect of Surface Roughness, Oxide Film Thickness and Interfacial Sliding on the Electrical Contact Resistance of Aluminum
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
,
A242
, pp.
121
–
128
.
21.
Ono
,
Y.
,
Hirayama
,
K.
, and
Furukawa
,
K.
,
1974
, “
Electric Resistivity of Molten Fe-C, Fe-Si, and Fe-C-Si Alloys
,”
Tetsu to Hagane
,
60
, pp.
2110
–
2118
.
22.
Boyer, H. E., and Gall, T. L., 1984, Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, ASM.
23.
Touloukian, Y. S., editor, 1967, Thermophysical Properties of High Temperature Solid Materials, Vol. 4: Oxides and Their Solutions and Mixtures, Macmillan Co, New York, pp. 214.
24.
Grange
,
R. A.
,
Hribal
,
C. R.
, and
Porter
,
L. F.
,
1977
, “
Hardness of Tempered Martensite in Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
8A
, pp.
1775
–
1785
.
25.
Gould
,
J. F.
,
1987
, “
An Examination of Nugget Development During Spot Welding, Using Both Experimental and Analytical Techniques
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
66
, pp.
1s–10s
1s–10s
.
26.
Wei
,
P. S.
, and
Ho
,
C. Y.
,
1990
, “
Axisymmetric Nugget Growth During Resistance Spot Welding
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
112
, pp.
309
–
316
.
27.
Wei
,
P. S.
, and
Yeh
,
F. B.
,
1991
, “
Factors Affecting Nugget Growth with Mushy-Zone Phase Change during Resistance Spot Welding
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
113
, pp.
643
–
649
.
28.
Khan
,
J. A.
,
Broach
,
K.
, and
Arefin Kabir
,
A. A. S.
,
2000
, “
Numerical Thermal Model of Resistance Spot Welding in Aluminum
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
,
14
, pp.
88
–
95
.
29.
Bennon
,
W. D.
, and
Incropera
,
F. P.
,
1987
, “
A Continuum Model for Momentum, Heat and Species Transport in Binary Solid-Liquid Phase Change Systems—I. Model Formulation
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
30
, pp.
2161
–
2170
.
30.
Bennon
,
W. D.
, and
Incropera
,
F. P.
,
1988
, “
Numerical Analysis of Binary Solid-Liquid Phase Change Using a Continuum Model
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
,
13
, pp.
277
–
296
.
31.
Cramer, K. R., and Pai, S.-I., 1973, Magnetofluid Dynamics for Engineers and Applied Physicists, Scripta Publishing, Washington, D.C., pp. 42–45.
32.
Modest, M. F., 1993, Radiative Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 52–53.
33.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, chap. 5 and 6, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.