Abstract

Design methods for reinforced soil structures under static loading conditions are relatively well established. Little research has been conducted on the behavior of embedded geosynthetics subjected to repeated loadings. Such research is needed to improve the design of reinforced soil structures subjected to traffic and seismic loadings. The study reported here is related to the long-term performance of a geogrid embedded in Ottawa sand under several confining pressures and subjected to various tensile loads. Different magnitudes of sustained and repeated tensile loads were applied to the geogrid incrementally using a pullout device. The confining pressure increased the soil-geogrid interface friction force and thus affected strain distribution along the geogrid length. Creep developed in the geogrid as the applied tensile load increased. The geogrid creep strain rate at a given tension force was found to be independent of confining pressure at the point of this force application, that is, creep can be viewed as an intrinsic property of the geogrid. A rapid pullout failure of geogrid occurred as the applied sustained load approached the ultimate pullout capacity. Conversely, under repeated loading the pullout occurred progressively. The ultimate pullout load and interaction coefficient, Ci, obtained from repeated loading tests were about 20% less than the values obtained from sustained loading tests. This suggests that a Ci smaller than that obtained in static (conventional) tests should be used in structures subjected to dynamic load. Creep under repeated load was smaller than that under sustained load.

References

1.
Al-Ashou
,
M. O.
and
Hanna
,
T. H.
,
1990
, “
Deterioration of Reinforced Earth Elements Under Cyclic Loadings
,”
Performance of Reinforced Soil Structures
,
McGown
A.
,
Yeo
K.
, and
Andrawes
K. Z.
, Eds.,
Thomas Telford
,
London
, pp.
303
-
307
.
2.
Bathurst
,
R. J.
and
Cai
,
Z.
,
1994
, “
In-Isolation Load-Elongation Behavior of Two Geogrids
,”
Geosynthetics International
 1072-6349, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, pp.
1
-
19
.
3.
Collin
,
J. G.
and
Berg
,
R. R.
,
1993
, “
Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term Pullout Testing of Geogrid Reinforcements
,”
Geosynthetic Soil Reinforcement Testing Procedures
, ASTM STP 1190, Cheng, Ed.,
ASTM
,
Philadelphia
, pp.
184
-
194
.
4.
Ingold
,
T. S.
,
Montabell
,
F.
, and
Rimoldi
,
P.
,
1994
, “
Extrapolation Technique for Long-Term Strengths of Polymeric Geogrids
,”
Proceedings
,
Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
,
Singapore
, pp.
1117
-
1120
.
5.
Koerner
,
R. M.
,
1994
,
Designing with Geosynthetics
, 3rd. ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
6.
Kutara
,
K.
,
Aoyama
,
N.
,
Yasunaga
,
H.
, and
Kato
,
T.
,
1988
, “
Long-Term Pullout Tests of Polymergrids in Sand
,”
Proceedings
,
International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement
,
Fukuoka, Japan
, pp.
117
-
122
.
7.
Leshchinsky
,
D.
and
Boedeker
,
R. H.
,
1989
, “
Designing Geosynthetic Reinforced Earth Structures
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE
, Vol.
115
, No.
10
, pp.
1459
-
1478
.
8.
Leshchinsky
,
D.
,
Kaliakin
,
V. N.
,
Bose
,
P.
, and
Collin
,
J.
,
1994
, “
Failure Mechanisms in Geogrid Reinforced Segmental Walls: Experimental Implications
,”
Soils and Foundations
, Vol.
34
, No.
4
, JSSMFE, Tokyo.
9.
McGown
,
A.
,
Andrawes
,
K. Z.
,
Yeo
,
K. C.
, and
Dubois
,
D.
,
1984
, “
The Load-Strain-Time Behavior of Tensar Geogrids
,”
Proceedings
,
Symposium on Polymer Grid Reinforcement in Civil Engineering
,
London
, pp.
22
-
23
.
10.
Min
,
Y.
,
Leshchinsky
,
D.
,
Kaliakin
,
V. N.
, and
Ling
,
H. I.
,
1994
, “
Pullout Behavior of Embedded Geogrid Subjected to Sustained and Repeated Loads
,” research report,
Delaware Transportation Institute, University of Delaware
.
11.
Nimmesgern
,
M.
and
Bush
,
D.
,
1991
, “
The Effect of Repeated Traffic Loading on Geosynthetic Reinforcement Anchorage Resistance
,”
Proceedings
,
Geosynthetics '91 Conference
,
Atlanta
, pp.
665
-
672
.
12.
Perry
,
E. S.
and
Jundi
,
N.
,
1969
, “
Pullout Bond Stress Distribution Under Static and Dynamic Repeated Loading
,”
ACI Journal
 0002-8061, Vol.
66
, No.
5
, pp.
377
-
380
.
13.
Takasumi
,
D.
,
Green
,
K. R.
, and
Holtz
,
R. D.
,
1991
, “
Soil-Geosynthetics Interface Strength Characteristics: A Review of State-of-the-Art Testing Procedure
,”
Proceedings
,
Geosynthetics '91 Conference
,
Atlanta
, pp.
87
-
100
.
14.
Tatsuoka
,
F.
,
Molenkamp
,
F.
,
Torii
,
T.
, and
Hino
,
T.
,
1984
, “
Behavior of Lubricated Layers of Platens in Element Tests
,”
Soils and Foundations
, Vol.
24
, No. 1,
JSSMFE
,
Tokyo, Japan
, pp.
113
-
128
.
15.
Tatsuoka
,
F.
and
Leshchinsky
,
D.
, Eds.,
1993
,
Proceedings
,
Recent Case Histories of Permanent Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls
,
Balkema, Rotterdam
.
16.
Yasuda
,
Y.
,
Nagase
,
H.
, and
Marui
,
H.
,
1992
, “
Cyclic Pullout Tests of Geogrids in Soils
,”
Earth Reinforcement Practice
,
Ochiai
,
Hayashi
, and
Otani
, Eds.,
Balkema
,
Rotterdam
, pp.
185
-
190
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.