The effect of rounded labyrinth teeth tips and worn abradable lands has been found to give substantially increased leakage, which is well known to give reduced machine efficiency. Very little information concerning this exists, and some of the first measurements and visualization movies for stepped labyrinths are provided here to give an enhanced understanding of this phenomenon. A unique, very large-scale seal test facility was used. Glitter, and alternatively fluorescein dye, was employed as the flow tracer material. The flow visualization movies were digitally stored on the hard drive of a computer. Large decreases of leakage resistance due to the presence of worn teeth as well as rub-grooves were found. For the cases considered, the leakage resistance decrease for the large step height configurations were 85 percent, 55 percent, and 70 percent for the small, medium, and large pre-rub clearances, respectively. It was also found that the resistance varied with wear geometry, in order from highest to lowest resistance, as (a) ungrooved-unrounded-teeth, (b) ungrooved-rounded-teeth, (c) grooved-unrounded-teeth and (d) grooved-rounded-teeth. Further, a substantial tooth tip recirculation zone was visually observed only for the grooved-unrounded-teeth cases, and it was shown to be the mechanism by which the unrounded teeth give this configuration a higher resistance than do the rounded teeth.

1.
Zimmermann, H., Kammerer, A., and Wolff, K. H., 1994, “Performance of Worn Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper 94-GT-131.
2.
Sneck
,
H. J.
,
1974
, “
Labyrinth Seal Literature Survey
,”
Journal of Lubrication Technology
,
96
, pp.
579
582
.
3.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Broussard
,
D. H.
, and
Veldanda
,
S. B.
,
1993
, “
Labyrinth Seal Leakage Resistance and Visualization Experiments in a Novel, Variable-Configuration Facility
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
36
, pp.
213
218
.
4.
Stocker, H. L., 1975, “Advanced Labyrinth Seal Design Performance for High Pressure Ratio Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper 75-WA/GT-22.
5.
Jerie, J., 1948, “Flow Through Straight-Through Labyrinth Seals,” Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Congress for Applied Mechanics, Vol. 2, ASME, New York, pp. 70–82.
6.
Egli
,
A.
,
1935
, “
The Leakage of Steam Through Labyrinth Seals
,”
Trans. ASME
,
57
, pp.
115
122
.
7.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Johnson
,
J. W.
, and
Broussard
,
D. H.
,
1997
, “
Flow Visualization and Leakage Measurements of Stepped Labyrinth Seals; Part 1: Annular Groove
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
839
843
.
8.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Younger
,
J. S.
, and
Wernig
,
M. D.
,
1997
, “
Flow Visualization and Leakage Measurements of Stepped Labyrinth Seals; Part 2: Sloping Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
844
848
.
9.
Waschka
,
W.
,
Wittig
,
S.
, and
Kim
,
S.
,
1992
, “
Influence of High Rotational Speeds on the Heat Transfer and Discharge Coefficients in Labyrinth Seals
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
462
468
.
10.
Stocker, H. L., Cox, D. M., and Holle, G. F., 1977, “Aerodynamic Performance of Conventional and Advanced Design Labyrinth Seals With Solid-Smooth, Abradable, and Honeycomb Lands,” NASA CR-135307, Detroit Diesel Allison, Indianapolis, IN.
11.
Rhode, D. L., and Allen, B. F., 1998, “Visualization and Measurements Of Rub-Groove Leakage Effects On Straight-Through Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper 98-GT-506.
12.
Rao
,
C. K. V.
, and
Narayanamurthi
,
R. G.
,
1973
, “
An Experimental Study of Performance Characteristics of Labyrinth Seals
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
,
53
, pp.
277
281
.
13.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
,
1953
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
,
75
, pp.
3
9
.
14.
Vermes
,
G.
,
1961
, “
A Fluid Mechanics Approach to the Labyrinth Seal Leakage Problem
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
83
, pp.
161
169
.
15.
Rhode, D. L., Johnson, J. W., and Allen, B. F., 1997, “Effect of Flow Instabilities and Self-Sustained Oscillations on Labyrinth Seal Leakage Resistance,” ASME Paper 97-GT-214.
You do not currently have access to this content.