Squeeze film dampers (SFDs) provide vibration attenuation and structural isolation to aircraft gas turbine engines which must be able to tolerate larger imbalances while operating above one or more critical speeds. Rotor-bearing-SFD systems are regarded in theory as highly nonlinear, showing jump phenomena and even chaotic behavior for sufficiently large levels of rotor imbalance. Yet, few experimental results of practical value have verified the analytical predictions. A test rig for measurement of the dynamic forced response of a three-disk rotor (45 kg) supported on two cylindrical SFDs is described. The major objective is to provide a reliable data base to validate and enhance SFD design practice and to allow a direct comparison with analytical models. The open-ends SFD are supported by four-bar centering structures, each with a stiffness of 3.5 MN/m. Measured synchronous responses to 9000 rpm due to various imbalances show the rotor-SFD system to be well damped with amplification factors between 1.6 and 2.1 while traversing cylindrical and conical modes critical speeds. The rotor amplitudes of motion are found to be proportional to the imbalances for the first mode of vibration, and the damping coefficients extracted compare reasonably well to predictions based on the full-film, open-ends SFD. Tight lip (elastomeric) seals contribute greatly to the overall damping of the test rig. Measured dynamic pressures at the squeeze film lands are well above ambient values with no indication of lubricant dynamic cavitation as simple theoretical models dictate. The measurements show absence of nonlinear behavior of the rotor-SFD apparatus for the range of imbalances tested.

1.
Li
X. H.
, and
Taylor
D.
,
1987
, “
Nonsynchronous Motion of Squeeze Film Damper Systems
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
109
, pp.
169
176
.
2.
Mohan
S.
, and
Hahn
E. J.
,
1974
, “
Design for Squeeze Film Damper Supports for Rigid Rotors
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
96
, pp.
976
982
.
3.
Murphy, B. T., 1995, XLROTOR, Rotating Machinery Analysis, Inc., Austin, TX.
4.
San Andres
L.
, and
Vance
J. M.
,
1988
, “
Effect of Fluid Inertia on the Performance of Squeeze Film Damper Supported Rotors
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
110
, pp.
51
57
.
5.
San Andres, L., and Lubell, D., 1996, “Unbalance Response of a Test Rotor Supported on Squeeze Film Dampers,” Report TRC-SFD-2-96, TAMU Turbomachinery Research Consortium. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
6.
San Andres, L., 1995, “Theoretical and Experimental Comparisons for Damping Coefficients of a Short Length Open-End Squeeze Film Damper,” presented at the ASME Turbo Expo ’95 Land, Sea and Air Conference, Houston, TX, ASME Paper 95-GT-98.
7.
Vance, J., 1988, Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NY.
8.
Zeidan, F. Y., 1994, “Applications of Squeeze Film Dampers,” Turbomachinery International, Sept/Oct., pp. 50–53.
9.
Zeidan, F., San Andres, L., and Vance, J., 1996, “Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery,” Proceedings of the 25th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, pp. 169–188.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.