The effect of wall streamlining on flow development over a circular cylinder was investigated experimentally in an adaptive-wall wind tunnel. Experiments were carried out for a Reynolds number of 57,000 and three blockage ratios of 5%, 8%, and 17%. Three test section wall configurations were investigated, namely, geometrically straight walls (GSW), aerodynamically straight walls (ASW), and streamlined walls (SLW). The results show that solid blockage effects are evident in cylinder surface pressure distributions for the GSW and ASW configurations, manifested by an increased peak suction and base suction. Upon streamlining the walls, pressure distributions for each blockage ratio investigated closely match distributions expected for low blockage ratios. Wake blockage limits wake growth in the GSW configuration at 7.75 and 15 diameters downstream of the cylinder for blockages of 17% and 8%, respectively. This adverse effect can be rectified by streamlining the walls, with the resulting wake width development matching that expected for low blockage ratios. Wake vortex shedding frequency and shear layer instability frequency increase in the GSW and ASW configurations with increasing blockage ratio. The observed invariance of the near wake width with wall configuration suggests that the frequency increase is caused by the increased velocity due to solid blockage effects. For all the blockage ratios investigated, this increase is rectified in the SLW configuration, with the resulting Strouhal numbers of about 0.19 matching that expected for low blockage ratios at the corresponding Reynolds number. Blockage effects on the shear layer instability frequency are also successfully mitigated by streamlining the walls.

References

1.
Tavoularis
,
S.
, 2005,
Measurement in Fluid Mechanics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
, Chap. 6.
2.
Barlow
,
J. B.
,
Rae
,
W. H.
, and
Pope
,
A.
, 1999,
Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing
,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chap. 9.
3.
West
,
G. S.
, and
Apelt
,
C. J.
, 1982, “
The Effects of Tunnel Blockage and Aspect Ratio on the Mean Flow Past a Circular Cylinder with Reynolds Numbers between 104 and 105
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
114
, pp.
361
377
.
4.
Wolf
,
S. W. D.
, 1995, “
Adaptive Wall Technology for Improved Wind Tunnel Testing Techniques – A Review
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
31
, pp.
85
136
.
5.
Meyer
,
O.
, and
Nitsche
,
W.
, 2004, “
Update on Progress in Adaptive Wind Tunnel Wall Technology
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
40
, pp.
119
141
.
6.
Sears
,
W. R.
, and
Erickson
,
J. C.
, 1988, “
Adaptive Wind Tunnels
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
20
, pp.
17
34
.
7.
Wolf
,
S. W. D.
, and
Goodyer
,
M. J.
, 1988, “
Predictive Wall Adjustment Strategy for Two-Dimensional Flexible Walled Adaptive Wind Tunnel – A Detailed Description of the First One-Step Method
,”
NASA Contract Rep. NASA CR 181635
.
8.
Everhart
,
J. L.
, 1983, “
A Method for Modifying Two-Dimensional Adaptive Wind Tunnel Walls Including Analytical and Experimental Verification
,”
NASA TP-2081
.
9.
Russo
,
G. P.
,
Zuppardi
,
G.
, and
Basciani
,
M.
, 1995, “
An Experimental Comparison of Two Adaptation Strategies in an Adaptive-Walls Wind Tunnel
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
19
(
4
), pp.
274
279
.
10.
Goodyer
,
M. J.
, and
Saquib
,
M.
, 2007, “
Blockage Limits in a Two-Dimensional Self-Streamlining Wind Tunnel
,”
25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference
,
AIAA
,
25
28
June 2007,
Miami, FL
.
11.
Kankainen
,
P.
,
Brundrett
,
E.
, and
Kaiser
,
J. A.
, 1994, “
A Small Wind Tunnel Significantly Improved by a Multi-Purpose, Two-Flexible-Wall Test Section
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
,
116
, pp.
419
423
.
12.
Okamoto
,
T.
, and
Takeuchi
,
M.
, 1975, “
Effect of Side Walls of Wind Tunnel on Flow Around Two-Dimensional Circular Cylinder and its Wake
,”
Bull. JSME
,
18
, pp.
1011
1017
.
13.
Richter
,
A.
, and
Naudascher
,
E.
, 1976, “
Fluctuating Forces on a Rigid Circular Cylinder in Confided Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
78
, pp.
561
576
.
14.
Hiwada
,
M.
, and
Mabuchi
,
I.
, 1981, “
Flow Behaviour and Heat Transfer Around the Circular Cylinder at High Blockage Ratios
,”
Heat Transfer Jpn. Res.
,
10
, pp.
17
39
.
15.
Ramamurthy
,
A. S.
, and
Lee
,
P. M.
, 1973, “
Wall Effects on Flow Past Bluff Bodies
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
443
451
.
16.
Zdravkovich
,
M. M.
, 2003,
Flow around Circular Cylinders
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
, Vol.
2
, Chap. 23.
17.
Kawall
,
J. G.
,
Shokr
,
M.
, and
Keffer
,
J. F.
, 1983, “
A Digital Technique for the Simultaneous Measurements of Streamwise and Lateral Velocities in Turbulent Flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
133
, pp.
83
112
.
18.
Sumner
,
D.
, 1994, “
An Experimental Investigation of 3-D Models in a 2-D Adaptive Wall Test Section
,” MASc thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
19.
Roshko
,
A.
, 1993, “
Perspectives of Bluff Body Aerodynamics
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
49
, pp.
79
100
.
20.
Norberg
,
C.
, 2003, “
Fluctuating Lift on a Circular Cylinder: Review and New Measurements
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
17
, pp.
57
96
.
21.
Townsend
,
A. A.
, 1976, “
The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow
,” 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
, Chap. 6.
22.
Zdravkovich
,
M. M.
, 1997,
Flow around Circular Cylinders
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
, Vol.
1
, Chap. 5.
23.
Bloor
,
M. S.
, 1964, “
The Transition to Turbulence in the Wake of a Circular Cylinder
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
19
, pp.
290
304
.
24.
Prasad
,
A.
, and
Williamson
,
C. H. K.
, 1997, “
The Instability of the Shear Layer Separating from a Bluff Body
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
333
, pp.
375
402
.
25.
Thomson
,
M. C.
, and
Hourigan
,
K.
, 2005, “
The Shear-Layer Instability of a Circular Cylinder Wake
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
17
, pp.
1
4
.
26.
Rajagopalan
,
S.
, and
Antonia
,
R. A.
, 2005, “
Flow Around a Circular Cylinder – Structure of the Near Wake Shear Layer
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
38
, pp.
393
402
.
You do not currently have access to this content.