A simple semi-empirical model for predicting the peak overpressure field that results when a shock emerges from a circular shock tube is presented and validated. By assuming that the shape of the expanding shock remains geometrically similar after an initial development period, an equation that describes the peak overpressure field in the horizontal plane containing the shock tube’s centerline was developed. The accuracy of this equation was evaluated experimentally by collecting peak overpressure field measurements along radials from the shock tube exit at 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg over a range of shock Mach numbers from 1.15 to 1.45. It was found that the equation became more accurate at higher Mach numbers with percent differences between experimental measurements and theoretical predictions ranging from 1.1% to 3.6% over the range of Mach numbers considered. (1) Shocks do propagate in a geometrically similar manner after some initial development length over the range of Mach numbers considered here. (2) The model developed here gives reasonable predictions for the overpressure field from a shock emerging from a circular shock tube. (3) Shocks are expected to be completely symmetric with respect to the shock tube’s centerline, and hence, a three dimensional overpressure field may be predicted by the model developed here. (4) While there is a range of polar angle at which the shock shape may be described as being spherical with respect to the shock tube’s exit, this range does not encompass the entirety of the half space in front of the shock tube, and the model developed here is needed to accurately describe the entire peak overpressure field.

1.
Bertrand
,
B.
, and
Matthews
,
W.
, 1965, “
Overpressures and Durations of Shock Waves Emerging From Open-Ended Shock Tubes
,” U.S. Army Materiel Command Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, MA, Memorandum Report No. 1724.
2.
Sloan
,
S. A.
, and
Nettleton
,
M. A.
, 1975, “
A Model for the Axial Decay of a Shock Wave in a Large Abrupt Area Change
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
71
(
4
), pp.
769
784
.
3.
Skews
,
B. W.
, 1966, “
Profiles of Diffracting Shock Waves
,” Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Witwatersand, Johannesburg, Report No. 3.
4.
Skews
,
B. W.
, 1967, “
The Shape of a Diffracting Shock Wave
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
29
(
2
), pp.
297
304
.
5.
Whitham
,
G. B.
, 1957, “
New Approach to Problems of Shock Dynamics Part 1: Two Dimensional Problems
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
2
(
2
), pp.
145
171
.
6.
Whitham
,
G. B.
, 1959, “
A New Approach to the Problems of Shock Dynamics. Part 2. Three Dimensional Problems
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
5
(
3
), pp.
369
386
.
7.
Chisnell
,
R. F.
, 1957, “
The Motion of a Shock Wave in a Channel With Applications to Cylindrical and Spherical Shock Waves
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
2
(
3
), pp.
286
298
.
8.
Haselbacher
,
A.
,
Balachandar
,
S.
, and
Kieffer
,
S.
, 2007, “
Open-Ended Shock Tube Flows: Influence of Pressure Ratio and Diaphragm Position
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
45
(
8
), pp.
1917
1929
.
9.
Newman
,
A. J.
, 2010, “
The Peak Overpressure Field Resulting From the Discharge of an Open-Ended Shock Tube
,” Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
10.
Sloan
,
S. A.
, and
Nettleton
,
M. A.
, 1978, “
A Model for the Decay of a Wall Shock in a Large Abrupt Area Change
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
88
(
2
), pp.
259
272
.
11.
Walter
,
P. L.
, 2010, “
Measuring Static Overpressures in Air Blast Environments
,” PCB Piezotronics, Depew, NY, Technical Note No. PCB-TN-27-051009.
You do not currently have access to this content.