It is the aim of this article to investigate numerically the effects of spanwise pressure gradient on an embedded streamwise vortex in a turbulent boundary layer. The governing equations were discretized by the finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm was used to couple between pressure and velocity. The LRR model for Reynolds stresses was utilized to predict the anisotropy of turbulence effectively. The validation was done for two cases: one is the development of a streamwise vortex embedded in a pressure-driven, three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. The other involves streamwise vortex pairs embedded in a turbulent boundary layer without the spanwise pressure gradient. In the case of the former, the predicted results were compared with Shizawa and Eaton’s experimental data. In the latter case, the calculated results were compared against the experimental data of Pauley and Eaton. We performed numerical simulations for three cases with different values of spanwise pressure gradient. As a result, the primary streamwise vortex with spanwise pressure gradients decays more rapidly than the case with no pressure gradients, as the spanwise pressure gradient increases. This indicates that the spanwise pressure gradient may play an important role on mean and turbulent structures. In particular, it can be seen that the increase of pressure gradient enhances a level of turbulent normal stresses.

1.
Belik
,
L.
,
1973
, “
The Secondary Flow about Circular Cylinders Mounted Normal to a Flat Plate
,”
Aero. Quarterly
,
24
, pp.
47
54
.
2.
Shabaka
,
I. M. M. A.
,
Bradshaw
,
P.
,
1981
, “
Turbulent Flow Measurements in an Idealized Wing/Body Junction
,”
AIAA J.
,
19
, No.
2
, pp.
131
312
.
3.
Fleming
,
J. L.
,
Simpson
,
R. L.
,
Cowling
,
J. E.
, and
Devenport
,
W. J.
,
1993
, “
An Experimental Study of a Turbulent Wing-Body Junction and Wake Flow
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
14
, pp.
336
378
.
4.
Pearcy, H. H., 1961, “Boundary Layer and Flow Control, G. V. Lachmann, Vol. IV.
5.
Shabaka
,
I. M. M. A.
,
Mehta
,
R. D.
, and
Bradshaw
,
P.
,
1985
, “
Longitudinal Vortices Imbedded in Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part I. Single Vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
155
, pp.
37
57
.
6.
Mehta
,
R. D.
, and
Bradshaw
,
P.
,
1988
, “
Longitudinal Vortices Imbedded in Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
188
, pp.
529
546
.
7.
Westphal, R. V., Eaton, J. K., and Pauley, W. R., 1987, “Interaction Between a Vortex and a Turbulent Boundary Layer in a Streamwise Pressure Gradient,” Turbulent Shear Flows 5, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 3, pp. 266–277.
8.
Eibeck
,
P. A.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
1987
, “
Heat Transfer Effects of a Streamwise Vortex Imbedded in a Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
109
, pp.
16
24
.
9.
Shizawa
,
T.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
1992
, “
Turbulence Measurements for a Longitudinal Vortex Interaction with a Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
AIAA J.
,
30
, No.
1
, pp.
49
55
.
10.
Lee
,
S. H.
,
Ryou
,
H. S.
, and
Choi
,
Y. K.
,
1999
, “
Heat Transfer in a Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer with Longitudinal Vortices
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
42
, pp.
1521
1534
.
11.
Launder
,
B. E.
,
Reece
,
G. J.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
,
1975
, “
Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Closure
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
68
, pp.
537
566
.
12.
Pauley, W. R., and Eaton, J. K., 1988, “The Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer Effects of Streamwise Vortices Embedded in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Report MD-51, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
13.
Shir
,
C. C.
,
1973
, “
A Preliminary Study of Atmospheric Turbulent Flow in the Idealized Planetary Boundary Layer
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
,
30
, pp.
1327
1339
.
14.
Rotta
,
J. C.
,
1951
, “
Statistischer Theorie Nichthomogener Turbulenz
,”
Z. fu¨r Physik
,”
129
, pp.
543
572
.
15.
Rotta, J. C., 1979, “A Family of Turbulence Models for Three-Dimensional Boundary Layers,” Turbulent Shear Flows I, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 267–278.
16.
Naot
,
D.
,
Shavit
,
A.
, and
Wolfshtein
,
M.
,
1970
, “
Interaction Between Components of the Turbulent Velocity Correlation Tensor
,”
Isr. J. Technol.
,
8
, p.
259
259
.
17.
Bradshaw, P., 1973, “The Strategy of Calculation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows,”Imperial College Aero. Report, No. 73-05.
18.
Gibson
,
M. M.
, and
Launder
,
B. E.
,
1978
, “
Ground Effects on Pressure Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
86
, pp.
491
511
.
19.
Wilcox, D. C., 1993, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, Inc. La Canada, CA.
20.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
,
1974
, “
The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flow
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
3
, pp.
269
289
.
21.
Launder, B. E., 1986, “Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Near Walls,” Rep., TFD/86/4, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST.
22.
Lee
,
I.
,
Ryou
,
H. S.
,
Lee
,
S. H.
, and
Soo
,
C.
,
2000
, “
Comparison of Two-Equation Model and Reynolds Stress Models with Experimental Data for the Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer in a 30 Degree Bend
,”
KSME International Journal
,
14
, No.
1
, pp.
93
102
.
23.
Schwarz W. R., and Bradshaw, P., 1992, “Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer in a 30 Degree Bend: Experiment and Modeling,” Rept. MD-61, Thermosciences Division, Stanford University.
You do not currently have access to this content.