High energy penalty and cost are major obstacles in the widespread use of CO2 capture techniques for reducing CO2 emissions. Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is an innovative means of achieving CO2 capture with less cost and low energy penalty. This paper conducts a detailed techno-economic analysis of a natural gas-fired CLC-based power plant. The power plant capacity is 1000 MWth gross power on a lower heating value basis. The analysis was done using Aspen Plus. The cost analysis was done by considering the plant location to be in the United Arab Emirates. The plant performance was analyzed by using the cost of equipment, cost of electricity, payback period, and the cost of capture. The performance of the CLC system was also compared with a conventional natural gas combined cycle plant of the same capacity integrated with post combustion CO2 capture technology. The analysis shows that the CLC system had a plant efficiency of 55.6%, electricity cost of 5.5 cents/kWh, payback time of 3.77 years, and the CO2 capture cost of $27.5/ton. In comparison, a similar natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant with CO2 capture had an efficiency of 50.6%, cost of electricity of 6.1 cents/kWh, payback period of 4.57 years, and the capture cost of $42.9/ton. This analysis shows the economic advantage of the CLC integrated power plants.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2018
Research-Article
Techno-Economic Analysis of a Carbon Capture Chemical Looping Combustion Power Plant
Oghare Victor Ogidiama,
Oghare Victor Ogidiama
Department of Mechanical and Materials
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohammad Abu Zahra,
Mohammad Abu Zahra
Department of Chemical and Environmental
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Search for other works by this author on:
Tariq Shamim
Tariq Shamim
Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;
Mechanical Engineering Program,
University of Michigan-Flint,
Flint, MI 48502
e-mail: shamim@umich.edu
Materials Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;
Mechanical Engineering Program,
University of Michigan-Flint,
Flint, MI 48502
e-mail: shamim@umich.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Oghare Victor Ogidiama
Department of Mechanical and Materials
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Mohammad Abu Zahra
Department of Chemical and Environmental
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Tariq Shamim
Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;
Mechanical Engineering Program,
University of Michigan-Flint,
Flint, MI 48502
e-mail: shamim@umich.edu
Materials Engineering,
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology,
P.O. Box 54224,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;
Mechanical Engineering Program,
University of Michigan-Flint,
Flint, MI 48502
e-mail: shamim@umich.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 15, 2017; final manuscript received May 2, 2018; published online June 12, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Mohamed A. Habib.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Nov 2018, 140(11): 112004 (11 pages)
Published Online: June 12, 2018
Article history
Received:
December 15, 2017
Revised:
May 2, 2018
Citation
Ogidiama, O. V., Abu Zahra, M., and Shamim, T. (June 12, 2018). "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Carbon Capture Chemical Looping Combustion Power Plant." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. November 2018; 140(11): 112004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040193
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Fuel Consumption Prediction in Dual-Fuel Low-Speed Marine Engines With Low-Pressure Gas Injection
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
A Semi-Analytical Rate-Transient Analysis Model for Fractured Horizontal Well in Tight Reservoirs Under Multiphase Flow Conditions
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November 2024)
Experimental Investigation of New Combustion Chamber Geometry Modification on Engine Performance, Emission, and Cylinder Liner Microstructure for a Diesel Engine
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Downdraft Gasification for Biogas Production: The Role of Artificial Intelligence
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Related Articles
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Power Plant With Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Multistage Chemical Looping Combustion
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2017)
An Eulerian Approach to Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Chemical-Looping Combustion Reactor With Chemical Reactions
J. Energy Resour. Technol (July,2016)
Analysis of Gas-Steam Combined Cycles With Natural Gas Reforming and CO 2 Capture
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2005)
Carbon Capture for Automobiles Using Internal Combustion Rankine Cycle Engines
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (May,2009)
Related Chapters
Conclusions
Clean and Efficient Coal-Fired Power Plants: Development Toward Advanced Technologies
Introduction
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration
Gas-Fluidized Beds
Two-Phase Heat Transfer