Each year, the oil industry generates millions of barrels of wastes that need to be properly managed. For many years, most oil field wastes were disposed of at a significant cost. However, over the past decade, the industry has developed many processes and technologies to minimize the generation of wastes and to more safely and economically dispose of the waste that is generated. Many companies follow a three-tiered waste management approach. First, companies try to minimize waste generation when possible. Next, they try to find ways to reuse or recycle the wastes that are generated. Finally, the wastes that cannot be reused or recycled must be disposed of. Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) has evaluated the feasibility of various oil field waste management technologies for the U.S. Department of Energy. This paper describes four of the technologies Argonne has reviewed. In the area of waste minimization, the industry has developed synthetic-based drilling muds (SBMs) that have the desired drilling properties of oil-based muds without the accompanying adverse environmental impacts. Use of SBMs avoids significant air pollution from work boats hauling offshore cuttings to shore for disposal and provides more efficient drilling than can be achieved with water-based muds. Downhole oil/water separators have been developed to separate produced water from oil at the bottom of wells. The produced water is directly injected to an underground formation without ever being lifted to the surface, thereby avoiding potential for groundwater or soil contamination. In the area of reuse/recycle, Argonne has worked with Southeastern Louisiana University and industry to develop a process to use treated drill cuttings to restore wetlands in coastal Louisiana. Finally, in an example of treatment and disposal, Argonne has conducted a series of four baseline studies to characterize the use of salt caverns for safe and economic disposal of oil field wastes.

Issue Section:
Technology Overview
Keywords:
oil technology, waste disposal, air pollution control, natural resources
Topics:
Drilling, Drills (Tools), Oil fields, Water, Wells, Waste management, Fluids
1.
API, 2000, “Overview of Exploration and Production Waste Volumes and Waste Management Practices in the United States,” prepared by ICF Consulting for the American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, May.
2.
Tibbetts, P.J.C., Buchanan, I.T., Gawel, L.J., and Large, R., 1992, “A Comprehensive Determination of Produced Water Composition,” in Produced Water, J.P. Ray and F.R. Englehardt (editors), Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 97–112.
3.
Fillo, J.P., Koraido, S.M., and Evans, J.M., 1992, “Sources, Characteristics, and Management of Produced Waters from Natural Gas Production and Storage Operations,” in Produced Water, J.P. Ray and F.R. Englehardt (editors), Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 151–161.
4.
Veil, J.A., 1997, “Costs for Offsite Disposal of Nonhazardous Oil Field Wastes: Salt Caverns versus Other Disposal Methods,” prepared for DOE Office of Fossil Energy (April 1997); also published by DOE-National Petroleum Technology Office as DOE/BC/W-31-109-ENG-38-3, DE97008692, (available on the Internet at: www.npto.doe.gov/saltcaverns/studies.html), September.
5.
Veil, J.A., 2001, “New Technologies for Managing Oil Field Waste,” ETCE 2001-17042, Proceedings of the 23rd Energy Sources Technology Conference and Exposition, Houston, TX, February 5-7, available from American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
6.
Veil, J.A., 2002, “Drilling Waste Management: Past, Present, and Future,” Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, September 29-October 2, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
7.
National Research Council, 1983, Drilling Discharges in the Marine Environment, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
8.
Neff, J.M., 1987, “Biological Effects of Drilling Fluids, Drill Cuttings and Produced Water,” in Long-Term Environmental Effects of Offshore Oil and Gas Development, D.F. Boesch and N.N. Rabalais (editors), Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom.
9.
Gillmor, R.B., Menzie, C.A., Mariana, G.M., Levin, D.R., Ayers, R.C., Jr., and Sauer, T.C., Jr., 1985, “Effects of Exploratory Drilling Discharges on the Benthos,” Wastes in the Ocean, Vol. 4, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
10.
Neff
,
J.M.
,
Bothner
,
M.H.
,
Maciolek
,
N.J.
, and
Grassle
,
J.F.
, 1989, “Impacts of Exploratory Drilling for Oil and Gas on the Benthic Environment of Georges Bank,” Marine Environment Research, 27, pp. 77–114.
11.
Davies, J.M., Bedborough, D.R., Blackman, R.A.A., Addy, J.M., Appelbee, J.F., Grogan, W.C., Parker, J.G., and Whitehead, A., 1988, “Environmental Effect of Oil Based Mud Drilling in the North Sea,” Chapter 3 in Drilling Wastes, F.R. Englehardt, J.P. Ray, and A.H. Gillam (editors), Canada, pp. 59–89, Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom, April.
12.
Park, S., Cullum, D., and McLean, A.D., 1993, “The Success of Synthetic-Based Drilling Fluids Offshore Gulf of Mexico: A Field Comparison to Conventional Systems,” SPE 26354, Proceedings of SPE 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, October 3–6, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
13.
Candler, J.E., Hoskin, S., Churan, M., Lai, C.W., and Freeman, M., 1995, “Seafloor Monitoring for Synthetic-Based Mud Discharged in the Western Gulf of Mexico,” SPE 29694, Proceedings of the SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Houston, March 27–29, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
14.
Still, I., and Candler, J., 1997, “Benthic Toxicity Testing of Oil-Based and Syntheteic-Based Drilling Fluids,” presented at Eighth International Symposium of Toxicity Assessment, Perth, Australia, May 25–30.
15.
Burke, C.J., and Veil, J.A., 1995, “Potential Environmental Benefits from Regulatory Consideration of Synthetic Drilling Muds,” Argonne National Laboratory Technical Memorandum ANL/EAD/TM-43, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/project/documents/fs20/techmem.pdf), February.
16.
Veil, J.A., and Daly, J.M., 1999, “Innovative Regulatory Approach for Synthetic-Based Muds,” SPE paper 52737, Proceedings of the SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Austin, TX, February 28–March 3, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
17.
Veil, J.A., Daly, J.M., and Johnson, N., 1999, “EPA Expedites Offshore Regulations for Synthetic-Based Mud,” Oil & Gas J., pp. 78–84, September 13.
18.
Gasper, J.R, Veil, J.A., and Ayers, R.C., Jr., 2000, “Information on Commercial Disposal Facilities That May Have Received Offshore Drilling Wastes,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Engineering and Analysis Division, July.
19.
Meinhold, A.F., 1999, “Framework for a Comparative Environmental Assessment of Drilling Fluids Used Offshore,” SPE paper 52746, Proceedings of the 1999 SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Austin, TX, February 28–March 3, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
20.
Veil, J.A., 1998, “Data Summary of Offshore Drilling Waste Disposal Practices,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Engineering and Analysis Division, and U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/project/documents/fs20/EPA_DATA.pdf), November.
21.
Veil, J.A., 1999, “Update on Onshore Disposal of Offshore Drilling Wastes,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/project/documents/fs20/WASTDISP.pdf), November.
22.
Veil, J.A., Langhus, B.G., and Belieu, S., 1999, “Feasibility Evaluation of Downhole Oil/Water Separation (DOWS) Technology,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory, CH2M-Hill, and Nebraska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office, (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/dsp_detail.cfm?PubID=416), January.
23.
Veil, J.A, Langhus, B.G., and Belieu, S., 1999, “Downhole Oil/Water Separators: An Emerging Produced Water Disposal Technology,” SPE # 52703, Proceedings of the SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Austin, TX, March 1–3, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
24.
Veil, J.A., Langhus, B.G., and Belieu, S., 1999, “DOWS Reduce Produced Water Disposal Costs,” Oil & Gas Journal, March 22, pp. 76–85.
25.
Matthews, C.M., Chachula, R., Peachey, B.R., and Solanki, S.C., 1996, “Application of Downhole Oil/Water Separation Systems in the Alliance Field,” SPE # 35817, Proceedings of the 3rd SPE International Conference on Health, Safety & Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production, New Orleans, LA, June 9–12, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
26.
Stuebinger, L., Bowlin, K., Wright, J., Poythress, M., Watson, B., 1997, “Dual Injection and Lifting Systems: Rod Pumps,” SPE # 38790, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, October 5–8, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
27.
Wacker, H.J., Parker, R.M., Stuebinger, L., Harding, R., and Watson, B., 1999, “Test Proves Out Triple-Action Pump in Downhole Separation,” Oil & Gas J., October 4, pp. 49–55.
28.
Veil, J.A., 2000, “Summary of Data from DOE-Subsidized Field Trial #1 of Downhole Oil/Water Separator Technology-Texaco Well Bilbrey 30-Federal No. 5, Lea County, New Mexico,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for U.S. Department of Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office, 39 pp. (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/dsp_detail.cfm?PubID=1221), May.
29.
Argonne National Laboratory and Arthur Langhus Layne-LLC, 2001, Analysis of Data From a Downhole Oil/Water Separator Field Trial in East Texas, prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office 56 pp. (available on the Internet at: http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/dsp_detail.cfm?PubID=1504), February.
30.
Veil, J.A., 2001, “Interest Revives in Downhole Oil-Water Separators,” Oil & Gas J., February 26, pp. 47–56.
31.
Boesch
,
D.F.
,
Josselyn
,
M.N.
,
Mehta
,
A.J.
,
Morris
,
J.T.
,
Nuttle
,
W.K.
,
Simenstad
,
C.A.
, and
Swift
,
D.J.P.
,
1994
, “
Scientific Assessment of Coastal Wetland Loss, Restoration and Management in Louisiana
,”
J. Coastal Res.
,
20
,
1
–
103
.
32.
Veil, J.A., Johnson, N., and Ford, J.K., 2000, “Restoration of Coastal Wetlands Using Treated Drill Cuttings,” SPE # 61097, Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers International Conference on Health, Safety, and the Environment, Stavanger, Norway, June 26-28, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
33.
Chaineau
,
C.H.
,
Morel
,
J.L.
, and
Oudot
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Land Treatment of Oil-Based Drill Cuttings in An Agricultural Soil
,”
J. Environ. Qual.
,
25
, pp.
858
–
867
.
34.
Kelley
,
S.
, and
Mendelssohn
,
I.A.
, 1995, “An Evaluation of Stabilized, Water-Based Drill Cuttings and Organic Compost as Potential Substrate Sources for Marsh Restoration and Creation in Coastal Louisiana,” Ecological Engineering, 5, pp. 497–517.
35.
Shaffer, G.P., Hester, M.W., Miller, S., DesRoches, D.J., Souther, R.F., Childers, G.W., and Campo, F.M., 1998, “Restored Drill Cuttings for Wetlands Creation: Results of a Two-Year Mesocosm Approach to Emulate Field Conditions under Varying Hydrologic Regimes,” DOE/BC/14849-3, prepared by Southeastern Louisiana University Wetlands Restoration Laboratory, Hammond, LA, for U.S. Department of Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office, November.
36.
Hester, M.W., Shaffer, G.P., Willis, J.M., and DesRoches, D.J., 2001, “Restored Drill Cuttings for Wetland Creation: Results of a Mesocosm Approach to Emulate Field Conditions Under Varying Salinity and Hydrologic Conditions,” DOE/BC/14849-3, prepared by Southeastern Louisiana University Department of Biological Sciences, Hammond, LA, for U.S. Department of Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office, February.
37.
Veil, J.A., Johnson, N., and Ford, J.K., 2000, “Restoration of Coastal Wetlands Using Treated Drill Cuttings,” SPE # 61097, Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers International Conference on Health, Safety, and the Environment, Stavanger, Norway, June 26–28, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
38.
Veil, J., Elcock, D., Raivel, M., Caudle, D., Ayers, R., and Grunewald, B., 1996, “Preliminary Technical and Legal Evaluation of Disposing of Nonhazardous Oil Field Waste into Salt Caverns,” prepared for DOE Office of Fossil Energy, (available on the Internet at: www.npto.doe.gov/saltcaverns/studies.html), June.
39.
Berest, P., and Brouard, B., 1995, “Behavior of Sealed Solution-Mined Caverns,” presented at the Spring Meeting of the Solution Mining Research Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana, April, available from the Solution Mining Research Institute, Encinitas, CA.
40.
Tomasko, D., Elcock, D., Veil, J., and Caudle, D., 1997, “Risk Analyses for Disposing Nonhazardous Oil Field Wastes in Salt Caverns,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for DOE Office of Fossil Energy, (available on the Internet at: www.npto.doe.gov/saltcaverns/studies.html), December.
41.
Tomasko, D., 1991, “Modeling Vertical and Horizontal Solute Transport,” American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, December.
42.
Tomasko, D., 1994, “An Analytical Model for LNAPL Transport in the Vadose Zone,” Geological Society of America Fall Meeting, Seattle, Washington, December.
43.
Veil, J.A., Smith, K.P., Tomasko, D., Elcock, D., Blunt, D.L., and Williams, G.P., 1998, “Disposal of NORM-Contaminated Oil Field Waste in Salt Caverns,” prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for DOE National Petroleum Technology Office, (available on the Internet at: www.npto.doe.gov/saltcaverns/studies.html), August.
44.
Voss, D., 2003, personal communication between Voss, Baker-Hughes Centrilift, Claremore, OK, and J. A. Veil, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, DC, February 28. The communication was an electronic mail transmitting two files that included the drawing used in Figure 1.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.