Lean-burn gasoline engines have demonstrated 10–20% engine efficiency gain over stoichiometric engines and are widely considered as a promising technology for meeting the 54.5 miles-per-gallon (mpg) corporate average fuel economy standard by 2025. Nevertheless, nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions control for lean-burn gasoline for meeting the stringent Environmental Protection Agency tier 3 emission standards has been one of the main challenges toward the commercialization of highly efficient lean-burn gasoline engines in the United States. Passive selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, which consist of a three-way catalyst (TWC) and SCR, have demonstrated great potentials of effectively reducing NOx emissions for lean gasoline engines at low cost. However, passive SCR operation may cause significant fuel penalty since rich engine combustion is required for ammonia generation. The purpose of this study is to develop a model-predictive control (MPC) scheme for a lean-burn gasoline engine coupled with a passive SCR system to minimize the total equivalent fuel penalty associated with passive SCR operation while satisfying stringent NOx and ammonia (NH3) emissions requirements. Simulation results demonstrate that the MPC approach can reduce the fuel penalty by 43.9% in a simulated US06 cycle and 28.0% in a simulated urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) cycle, respectively, compared to the baseline control, while achieving over 97% DeNOx efficiency and less than 15 ppm tailpipe ammonia slip. The proposed MPC controller can potentially enable highly efficient lean-burn gasoline engines while meeting the stringent Environmental Protection Agency tier 3 emission standards.

References

1.
Johnson
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Vehicular Emissions in Review
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
9
(
2
), pp.
1258
1275
.
2.
Johnson
,
T. V.
,
2015
, “
Review of Vehicular Emissions Trends
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
8
(
3
), pp.
1152
1167
.
3.
DiGiulio
,
C. D.
,
Pihl
,
J. A.
,
II
,
J. E. P.
,
Amiridis
,
M. D.
, and
Toops
,
T. J.
,
2014
, “
Passive-Ammonia Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR): Understanding NH3 Formation Over Close-Coupled Three Way Catalysts (TWC)
,”
Catal. Today
,
231
, pp.
33
45
.
4.
Li
,
W.
,
Perry
,
K. L.
,
Narayanaswamy
,
K.
,
Kim
,
C. H.
, and
Najt
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Passive Ammonia SCR System for Lean-Burn SIDI Engines
,”
SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
99
106
.
5.
Theis
,
J. R.
,
Kim
,
J.
, and
Cavataio
,
G.
,
2015
, “
Passive TWC+SCR Systems for Satisfying Tier 2, Bin 2 Emission Standards on Lean-Burn Gasoline Engines
,”
SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
460
473
.
6.
Prikhodko
,
V. Y.
,
Parks
,
J. E.
,
Pihl
,
J. A.
, and
Toops
,
T. J.
,
2016
, “
Ammonia Generation and Utilization in a Passive SCR (TWC+SCR) System on Lean Gasoline Engine
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
9
(
2
), pp.
1289
1295
.
7.
Kim
,
C. H.
,
Perry
,
K.
,
Viola
,
M.
,
Li
,
W.
, and
Narayanaswamy
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Three-Way Catalyst Design for Urealess Passive Ammonia SCR: Lean-Burn SIDI Aftertreatment System
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2011-01-0306.
8.
Adams
,
E. C.
,
Skoglundh
,
M.
,
Elmøe
,
T.
, and
Carlsson
,
P.
, “
Water–Gas-Shift Assisted Ammonia Formation Over Pd/Ce/Alumina
,”
Catal. Today
,
307
(
1
), pp.
169
174
.
9.
Adams
,
E. C.
,
Skoglundh
,
M.
,
Folic
,
M.
,
Bendixen
,
E. C.
,
Gabrielsson
,
P.
, and
Carlsson
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Ammonia Formation Over Supported Platinum and Palladium Catalysts
,”
Appl. Catal. B
,
165
, pp.
10
19
.
10.
Adams
,
E. C.
,
Skoglundh
,
M.
, and
Carlsson
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Ammonia Formation From Nitric Oxide Over Pd-Based Catalysts in Multicomponent Feed Gas Compositions
,”
Catal. Commun.
,
95
, pp.
26
30
.
11.
Adams
,
E. C.
,
Skoglundh
,
M.
,
Gabrielsson
,
P.
, and
Carlsson
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Passive SCR: The Effect of H2 to NO Ratio on the Formation of NH3 Over Alumina Supported Platinum and Palladium Catalysts
,”
Top. Catal.
,
59
(
10–12
), pp.
970
975
.
12.
Prikhodko
,
V. Y.
,
Parks
,
J. E.
,
Pihl
,
J. A.
, and
Toops
,
T. J.
,
2016
, “
Passive SCR for Lean Gasoline NOx Control: Engine-Based Strategies to Minimize Fuel Penalty Associated With Catalytic NH3 Generation
,”
Catal. Today
,
267
, pp.
202
209
.
13.
Lin
,
Q.
,
Chen
,
P.
, and
Prikhodko
,
V. Y.
,
2017
, “
Model Predictive Control of a Lean-Burn Gasoline Engine Coupled With a Passive Selective Catalytic Reduction System
,”
ASME
Paper No. DSCC2017-5348.
14.
Zhao
,
F.
,
Lai
,
M.
, and
Harrington
,
D. L.
,
1999
, “
Automotive Spark-Ignited Direct-Injection Gasoline Engines
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
437
562
.
15.
Hsieh
,
M.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Development and Experimental Studies of a Control-Oriented SCR Model for a Two-Catalyst Urea-SCR System
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
,
19
(
4
), pp.
409
422
.
16.
Chambon
,
P.
,
Huff
,
S.
,
Norman
,
K.
,
Edwards
,
K. D.
,
Thomas
,
J.
, and
Prikhodko
,
V.
,
2011
, “
European Lean Gasoline Direct Injection Vehicle Benchmark
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2011-01-1218.
17.
Zhao
,
J.
,
Chen
,
P.
,
Ibrahim
,
U.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Comparative Study and Accommodation of Biodiesel in Diesel—Electric Hybrid Vehicles Coupled With Aftertreatment Systems
,”
Asian J. Control
,
18
(
1
), pp.
3
15
.
18.
Yan
,
F.
,
Wang
,
J.
, and
Huang
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Hybrid Electric Vehicle Model Predictive Control Torque-Split Strategy Incorporating Engine Transient Characteristics
,”
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
,
61
(
6
), pp.
2458
2467
.
19.
Chen
,
P.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Estimation and Adaptive Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems in Automotive Applications
,”
J. Process Control
,
40
, pp.
78
92
.
20.
Sciarretta
,
A.
,
Back
,
M.
, and
Guzzella
,
L.
,
2004
, “
Optimal Control of Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
12
(
3
), pp.
352
363
.
21.
Qin
,
S. J.
, and
Badgwell
,
T. A.
,
2003
, “
A Survey of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
,
11
(
7
), pp.
733
764
.
22.
Qin
,
S. J.
, and
Badgwell
,
T. A.
,
1997
, “
An Overview of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology
,”
AIche Symposium Series
,
New York
, pp.
232
256
.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.52.8909&rep=rep1&type=pdf
23.
Henson
,
M. A.
,
1998
, “
Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: Current Status and Future Directions
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
23
(
2
), pp.
187
202
.
24.
Morari
,
M.
, and
Lee
,
J. H.
,
1999
, “
Model Predictive Control: Past, Present and Future
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
23
(
4–5
), pp.
667
682
.
You do not currently have access to this content.