The subject of this paper is a flow-adaptive measurement grid algorithm developed for one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) flow field surveys with pneumatic probes in turbomachinery flows. The algorithm automatically determines the distribution and the amount of measurement points needed for an approximation of the pressure distribution within a predefined accuracy. The algorithm is based on transient traverses, conducted back and forth in the circumferential direction. A correction of the dynamic response is applied by deconvolving the transient measurement data using the information embedded in both transient measurements. In consequence, the performance of the algorithm is largely independent of the transient traversing speed and the geometry of the pressure measuring system. Insertion and removal strategies are incorporated in order to reduce measurement points and increase robustness toward differing flow field conditions. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated for 2D flow field surveys with a pneumatic five-hole probe in an annular cascade wind tunnel. The measurement grid points are automatically adjusted so that a consistent resolution of the flow features is achieved within the measurement domain. Furthermore, the application of the algorithm shows a significant reduction in the number of measurement points. Compared to the measurement duration based on uniform grids, the duration is reduced by at least 7%, while maintaining a high accuracy of the measurement. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the performance of measurement grids adapted to local flow field conditions. Consequently, valuable measurement time can be saved without a loss in quality of the data obtained.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2017
Research-Article
Quasi Two-Dimensional Flow-Adaptive Algorithm for Pneumatic Probe Measurements
Christian Bartsch,
Christian Bartsch
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Magnus Hölle,
Magnus Hölle
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Jeschke,
Peter Jeschke
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Timo Metzler
Timo Metzler
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Bartsch
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
Magnus Hölle
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Peter Jeschke
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Timo Metzler
1Corresponding author.
2Present address: Lufthansa Industry Solutions AS GmbH, Norderstedt 22844, Germany.
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received August 12, 2016; final manuscript received January 3, 2017; published online May 12, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Srinivasa M. Salapaka.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Jul 2017, 139(7): 071011 (10 pages)
Published Online: May 12, 2017
Article history
Received:
August 12, 2016
Revised:
January 3, 2017
Citation
Bartsch, C., Hölle, M., Jeschke, P., and Metzler, T. (May 12, 2017). "Quasi Two-Dimensional Flow-Adaptive Algorithm for Pneumatic Probe Measurements." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. July 2017; 139(7): 071011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035745
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Modeling and Control of a 3-DOF planar Cable-Driven Parallel Robot with Flexible Cables
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Error Estimation Method for Optimal Control Using Direct Collocation
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Motion Control Along Spatial Curves for Robot Manipulators: A Non-Inertial Frame Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
A Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Assessment of Unsteady Pressure Measurement Uncertainty—Part I: Single Sensor Probe
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2016)
Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2017)
Development of a Fast-Response Aerodynamic Pressure Probe Based on a Waveguide Approach
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2017)
Effect of Ingress on Turbine Disks
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Experimental Characterization of a Cavitating Orifice
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Evaluation of Four Vadose Zone Probes Used for Leak Detection and Monitoring
Current Practices in Ground Water and Vadose Zone Investigations
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach