Energy efficiency and short response times are usually conflicting goals. In the case of hydrostatic gears, two basic system configurations are commonly used, which allow to obtain better efficiency—the primary control setup—or faster responses—the secondary control. In this paper, (1) a different control setup is proposed, combining both primary and secondary control, and this new setup is shown to allow even faster responses than the secondary control having, in general, much lower energy requirements. We also address (2) the question of the design of a multiobjective optimal control for the proposed nonlinear structure, showing that the noninferior set, i.e., the set of points where the reduction of one cost function needs the increase of the others, depends on the control algorithm used. It is shown that combined use of pump and motor swash plate displacement yields a better trade-off between response speed and efficiency, and that solving approximately the nonlinear optimization problem delivers better efficiency than optimizing a system consisting of the original plant and a linearizing feedback.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Gears, Hydrostatics, Optimal control, Control algorithms, Design, Displacement, Energy efficiency, Engines, Feedback, Motors, Optimization, Pumps, Tradeoffs
1.
Avramovic´, D., 1981, “Auslegung o¨lhydraulischer Anlagen,” Institut fu¨r Flu¨ssigkeitstechnik der ETHZ. Zu¨rich, Autographie zur Vorlesung.
2.
Baurmgartner, H., 1979, “Das Nachlaufverhalten von Hydraulischen Vorschubseinheiten,” PhD thesis, ETHZ, Zu¨rich.
3.
Bryson, A. E., and Y.-C. Ho, 1975, Applied Optimal Control, Wiley.
4.
Cohon, J. L., 1978, Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press.
5.
Del. Re, L., and R. Keusch, 1989, “Modelling and Simulation of a Hydrostatic Drive in a State Variable Controlled Loop,” In Proceedings of the Third European Simulation Conference, Edinbourgh, Scotland, pp. 779–785.
6.
Guo, L., and H, Schwarz, 1989, “A Control Scheme for Bilinear Systems and Application to a Secondary Controlled Hydraulic Rotary Drive,” Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control. pp. 542–547.
7.
Jacazio, G., and L. Borello, 1986, “A Non-Linear Model of an Electrohydraulic Servosystem with an Axial Piston Hydraulic Motor,” 7th International Fluid Power Symposium.
8.
Krener, A. J., 1993, “Nonlinear Control Toolbox for MATLAB.” Technical report.
9.
Tzafestas
 
S. G.
,
Anagnostou
 
K. E.
and
Pimenides
 
T. G.
,
1984
, “
Stabilizing Optimal Control of Bilinear Systems with a Generalized Cost Function
,”
Optimal Control Applications & Methods
, Vol.
5
(
2
), pp.
111
–
117
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.