Topological optimization (TO) tools are today widely employed in several engineering fields (e.g., construction, aeronautics, aerospace, and automotive). The diffusion of these tools is due to their capacity to improve mechanical properties of products through a global optimization of the product in terms of weight, stiffness, strength, and cost. On the other hand, the adoption of TO tools still requires a sizeable organizational effort because, at present, these tools are mostly stand-alone and are not well integrated into the product development process (PDP). This paper presents an innovative methodology that supports designers and analysts in formalizing and transmitting design choices taken during project activities and in making the integration of TO tools in the PDP more efficient. The methodology clearly defines the roles, the activities, the data to exchange, and the software tools to be used in the process. Some custom computer-aided design automation tools have been implemented to improve the efficiency of the methodology. Moreover, this paper defines an original procedure to support the interpretation of the TO results.

1.
Bendsoe
,
M. P.
, and
Sigmund
,
O.
, 2003,
Topology Optimisation. Theory, Methods and Applications
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
2.
Saitou
,
K.
,
Nishiwaki
,
S.
,
Izui
,
K.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
, 2005, “
A Survey of Structural Optimization in Mechanical Product Development
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
1530-9827,
5
(
3
), pp.
214
227
.
3.
Schramm
,
U.
, 2003, “
Recent Advances in the Application of Topology Optimization in Design
,”
Fifth World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Venice, Italy.
4.
Schramm
,
U.
, 2005, “
Optimization Technology in Design–Trends, Direction, Gaps
,”
Sixth World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
5.
Schumacher
,
G.
, 2005, “
A350 Fuselage Tail Section 19—Concept Design by Optimization Methods
,”
German OptiStruct Users’ Meeting
.
6.
Vaidya
,
A.
,
Yu
,
S. H.
,
Ville
,
Y. S.
,
Nguyen
,
D. T.
, and
Rajan
,
S. D.
, 2006, “
Multiphysics CAD-Based Design Optimization
,”
Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach.
1539-7734,
34
, pp.
157
180
.
7.
Hawthorne & York International
, 2005, HYI-3D Design Optimization System, Internal Documentation, Phoenix, AZ.
8.
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Grosse
,
I. R.
, 2007, “
Ontologies for Supporting Engineering Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
1530-9827,
7
(
2
), pp.
141
150
.
9.
Kamali
,
K.
,
Jiang
,
L.
,
Yen
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
K. W.
, 2007, “
Using Q-Learning and Genetic Algorithms to Improve the Efficiency of Weight Adjustments for Optimal
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
1530-9827,
7
(
4
), pp.
302
309
.
13.
Yildiz
,
A. R.
,
Ozturk
,
N.
,
Kaya
,
N.
, and
Ozturk
,
F.
, 2003, “
Integrated Optimal Topology Design and Shape Optimization Using Neural Networks
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
25
(
4
), pp.
251
260
.
14.
Ozturk
,
N.
,
Yildiz
,
A. R.
,
Kaya
,
N.
, and
Ozturk
,
F.
, 2006, “
Neuro-Genetic Design Optimisation Framework to Support the Integrated Robust Design Optimisation Process in CE
,”
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl.
1063-293X,
14
(
1
), pp.
5
16
.
15.
Kyprianou
,
L. K.
, 1980, “
Shape Classification in Computer Aided Design
,” Ph.D. thesis, Christ College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
16.
Vandenbrande
,
J. H.
, and
Requicha
,
A. A. G.
, 1993, “
Spatial Reasoning for the Automatic Recognition of Machinable Features in Solid Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
0162-8828,
15
(
12
), pp.
1269
1285
.
17.
Corney
,
J. R.
, 1993, “
Graph-Based Feature Recognition
,” Ph.D. thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburg, Scotland, UK.
18.
Barone
,
S.
,
Beghini
,
M.
, and
Bertini
,
L.
, 1999, “
Coupled Structure Analysis and Geometric Modelling in Rule-Based Shape Optimisation
,”
11th ADM Conference and International Conference on Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering
, Vol.
A
, pp.
169
176
.
19.
Takezawa
,
A.
, 2003, “
Structural Optimisation for Concurrent Design and Analysis at the Conceptual Design Stage
,”
Advanced Design, Production and Management Systems
,
A. Balkema
,
Lisse, The Netherlands
, pp.
9
16
.
23.
Barbieri
,
L.
,
Bruno
,
F.
,
Cugini
,
U.
, and
Muzzupappa
,
M.
, 2008, “
Design Automation Tools as a Support for Knowledge Management in Topology Optimization
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, New York, August.
24.
Cugini
,
U.
,
Cascini
,
G.
, and
Ugolotti
,
U.
, 2007, “
Enhancing Interoperability in the Design Process, the PROSIT Approach
,”
Trends in Computer Aided Innovation
,
N.
Leon-Rovira
, ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
25.
Cugini
,
U.
,
Cascini
,
G.
,
Muzzupappa
,
M.
, and
Nigrelli
,
V.
, 2009, “
Integrated Computer-Aided Innovation: The PROSIT Approach
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
60
(
8
), pp.
629
641
.
26.
Barbieri
,
L.
,
Bruno
,
F.
,
Luchi
,
M. L.
,
Malito
,
G.
, and
Muzzupappa
,
M.
, 2009, “
Design of Automotive Components Using Advanced CAE Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 21st European Modeling and Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2009)
, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
27.
Barbieri
,
L.
,
Bruno
,
F.
,
Luchi
,
M. L.
,
Malito
,
G.
, and
Muzzupappa
,
M.
, 2010, “
Knowledge Management in Topology Optimization of Automotive Components
,”
Proceedings of the TMCE 2010
, Ancona, Italy.
You do not currently have access to this content.