Abstract

Accurate determination of pavement service life based on time-series pavement condition data is crucial to achieve many pavement maintenance and management objectives. Although pavement condition monitoring frequency is one of the most important influencing factors used to estimate pavement service life, previous studies and applications are mainly focused on different monitoring frequencies with equal time intervals. No studies investigating the effect of pavement monitoring frequency with unequal time intervals for the determination of pavement service life have been conducted. In this study, the effects of estimating pavement service life using two pavement condition monitoring methods (equal versus unequal time intervals) under the same monitoring frequency were investigated. Two potential influencing factors, i.e., estimation methods (trend interpolation and extrapolation) and R2 of the fitted performance curve, were considered in this study. The analysis results indicate that, compared to the equal interval monitoring method at the same monitoring frequency, especially for pavement sections using the trend extrapolation method, the estimated accuracy of pavement service life was significantly improved using the unequal interval monitoring method. According to the analysis results, an optimal pavement condition monitoring method was developed and validated based on unequal interval monitoring using actual pavement condition data of I-16 in Georgia.

References

1.
Gharaibeh
,
N.
and
Darter
,
M.
, “
Benefits and Costs of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Design Features
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol. 
1778
,
2001
, pp. 
1
8
, https://doi.org/10.3141/1778-01
2.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Pavement Service Life
,
Transportation Synthesis Report, WisDOT RD&T Program, Wisconsin Department of Transportation
,
Madison, WI
,
2004
, 61p.
3.
Haider
,
S.
,
Baladi
,
G.
,
Chatti
,
K.
, and
Dean
,
C.
, “
Effect of Frequency of Pavement Condition Data Collection on Performance Prediction
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol. 
2153
,
2010
, pp. 
67
80
, https://doi.org/10.3141/2153-08
4.
McGhee
,
K. H.
,
NCHRP Synthesis 334: Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington DC
,
2004
, 84p.
5.
Albitres
,
C. C.
,
Smith
,
R.
, and
Pendleton
,
O.
, “
Comparison of Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection Procedures for Local Agencies in San Francisco Bay Area, California
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol. 
1990
,
2007
, pp. 
119
126
, https://doi.org/10.3141/1990-14
6.
McQueen
,
J.
and
Timm
,
D.
, “
Part 2: Pavement Monitoring, Evaluation, and Data Storage: Statistical Analysis of Automated versus Manual Pavement Condition Surveys
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol. 
1940
,
2005
, pp. 
55
62
, https://doi.org/10.3141/1940-07
7.
Tsai
,
Y.
,
Feng
,
L.
,
Purcell
,
R.
, and
Rabun
,
J.
, “
A Reliable Statewide Pavement Performance Study Using a Confidence Evaluation System
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
, Vol. 
138
, No. 
3
,
2012
, pp. 
339
347
.
8.
Rao
,
S.
,
Yu
,
H. T.
, and
Darter
,
M. I.
,
The Longevity and Performance of Diamond-Ground Pavements
,
Research and Development Bulletin RD118, Portland Cement Association
,
Skokie, IL
,
1999
, 112p.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.