Some recent analyses modeled the response of collagenous tissues, such as epicardium, using a hypothetical network consisting of interconnected springlike fibers. The fibers in the network were organized such that internal nodes served as the connection point between three such collagen springs. The results for assumed affine and nonaffine deformations are contrasted after a homogeneous deformation at the boundary. Affine deformation provides a stiffer mechanical response than nonaffine deformation. In contrast to nonaffine deformation, affine deformation determines the displacement of internal nodes without imposing detailed force balance, thereby complicating the simplest intuitive notion of stress, one based on free body cuts, at the single node scale. The standard notion of stress may then be recovered via average field theory computations based on large micromesh realizations. An alternative and by all indications complementary viewpoint for the determination of stress in these collagen fiber networks is discussed here, one in which stress is defined using elastic energy storage, a notion which is intuitive at the single node scale. It replaces the average field theory computations by an averaging technique over randomly oriented isolated simple elements. The analytical operations do not require large micromesh realizations, but the tedious nature of the mathematical manipulation is clearly aided by symbolic algebra calculation. For the example case of linear elastic deformation, this results in material stiffnesses that relate the infinitesimal strain and stress. The result that the affine case is stiffer than the nonaffine case is recovered, as would be expected. The energy framework also lends itself to the natural inclusion of changes in mechanical response due to the chemical, electrical, or thermal environment.

1.
Chandran
,
P. L.
, and
Barocas
,
V. H.
, 2006, “
Affine Versus Non-Affine Fibril Kinematics in Collagen Networks: Theoretical Studies of Network Behavior
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
128
, pp.
259
270
.
2.
Chandran
,
P. L.
, and
Barocas
,
V. H.
, 2006, Erratum “
Affine Versus Non-Affine Fibril Kinematics in Collagen Networks: Theoretical Studies of Network Behavior
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
128
, p.
973
.
3.
Chandran
,
P. L.
, and
Barocas
,
V. H.
, 2007, “
Deterministic Material-Based Averaging Theory Model of Collagen Gel Micromechanics
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
129
, pp.
137
147
.
4.
Hori
,
M.
, and
Nemat-Nasser
,
S.
, 1999, “
On Two Micromechanics Theories for Determining MicroMacro Relations in Heterogeneous Solids
,”
Mech. Mater.
0167-6636,
31
, p.
667682
.
5.
Mariano
,
P. M.
, 2001, “
Multifield Theories in Mechanics of Solids
,”
Adv. Appl. Mech.
0065-2156,
38
, pp.
1
93
.
6.
Flory
,
P. J.
, and
Rehner
,
J.
, 1943, “
Statistical Mechanics of Cross-Linked Polymer Networks I: Rubberlike Elasticity
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
0021-9606,
11
, pp.
512
520
.
7.
Treloar
,
L. R. G.
, 1946, “
The Elasticity of a Network of Long-Chain Molecules
,”
Trans. Faraday Soc.
0014-7672,
42
, pp.
83
94
.
8.
Treloar
,
L. R. G.
, 1954, “
The Photoelastic Properties of Short Chain Molecular Networks
,”
Trans. Faraday Soc.
0014-7672,
50
, pp.
881
896
.
9.
Wang
,
M. C.
, and
Guth
,
E.
, 1952, “
Statistical Theory of Networks of Non-Gaussian Flexible Chains
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
0021-9606,
20
, pp.
1144
1157
.
10.
Arruda
,
E. M.
, and
Boyce
,
M. C.
, 1993, “
A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behavior of Rubber Elastic Materials
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
41
, pp.
389
412
.
11.
Bol
,
M.
, and
Reese
,
S.
, 2005, “
Finite Element Modeling of Rubber-Like Materials—A Comparison Between Simulation and Experiment
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
40
, pp.
5933
5939
.
12.
von Lockette
,
P. R.
, and
Arruda
,
E. M.
, 1999, “
Topological Studies of Bimodal Networks
,”
Macromolecules
0024-9297,
32
, pp.
1990
1999
.
13.
von Lockette
,
P. R.
,
Arruda
,
E. M.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
, 2002, “
Mesoscale Modeling of Bimodal Elastomer Networks: Constitutive and Optical Theories and Results
,”
Macromolecules
0024-9297,
35
, pp.
7100
7109
.
14.
Vandoolaeghe
,
W. L.
, and
Terentjev
,
E. M.
, 2005, “
Constrained Rouse Model of Rubber Viscoelasticity
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
0021-9606,
123
, p.
034902
.
15.
Kuhl
,
E.
,
Garikipati
,
K.
,
Arruda
,
E. M.
, and
Grosh
,
K.
, 2005, “
Remodeling of Biological Tissue: Mechanically Induced Reorientation of a Transversely Isotropic Chain Network
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
53
, pp.
1552
1573
.
16.
Gilbert
,
T. W.
,
Sacks
,
M. S.
,
Grashow
,
J. S.
,
Woo
,
S. L.-Y.
,
Badylak
,
S. F.
, and
Chancellor
,
M. B.
, 2006, “
Fiber Kinematics of Small Intestinal Submucosa Under Biaxial and Uniaxial Stretch
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
128
, pp.
890
898
.
17.
Ogden
,
R. W.
, 2001, “
Elements of the Theory of Finite Elasticity
,”
Nonlinear Elasticity: Theory and Applications
(
London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series
, Vol.
283
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, pp.
1
57
.
18.
Gasser
,
T.
,
Ogden
,
R. W.
, and
Holzapfel
,
G. A.
, 2006, “
Hyperelastic Modeling of Arterial Layers With Distributed Collagen Fibre Orientations
,”
J. R. Soc., Interface
1742-5689,
3
, pp.
15
35
.
You do not currently have access to this content.