The revised Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 201 specifies that the safety performance of vehicle upper interiors is determined from the resultant linear acceleration response of a free motion headform (FMH) impacting the interior at 6.7 m/s. This study addresses whether linear output data from the FMH test can be used to select an upper interior padding that decreases the likelihood of rotationally induced brain injuries. Using an experimental setup consisting of a Hybrid III head-neck structure mounted on a mini-sled platform, sagittal plane linear and angular head accelerations were measured in frontal head impacts into foam samples of various stiffness and density with a constant thickness (51 mm) at low (∼5.0 m/s), intermediate (∼7.0 m/s), and high (∼9.6 m/s) impact speeds. Provided that the foam samples did not bottom out, recorded peak values of angular acceleration and change in angular velocity increased approximately linearly with increasing peak resultant linear acceleration and value of the Head Injury Criterion HIC36. The results indicate that the padding that produces the lowest possible peak angular acceleration and peak change in angular velocity without causing high peak forces is the one that produces the lowest possible HIC36 without bottoming out in the FMH test.

1.
Sounik, D. F., Gansen, P., Clemons, J. L., and Liddle, J. W., 1997, “Head-Impact Testing of Polyurethane Energy-Absorbing (EA) Foams,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 970160.
2.
Myers, B. S., and Nightingale, R. W., 1997, “The Dynamics of Head and Neck Impact and its Role in Injury Prevention and the Complex Clinical Presentation of Cervical Spine Injury,” in Proceedings of the 1997 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, pp. 15–33.
3.
Nightingale, R. W., McElhaney, J. H., Camacho, D. L., Kleinberger, M., Winkelstein, B. A., and Myers, B. S., 1997, “The Dynamic Responses of the Cervical Spine: Buckling, End Conditions, and Tolerance in Compressive Impacts,” in Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 973344, pp. 451–471.
4.
Camacho
,
D. L. A.
,
Nightingale
,
R. W.
, and
Myers
,
B. S.
,
2001
, “
The Influence of Surface Padding Properties on Head and Neck Injury Risk
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
123
(
5
), pp.
432
439
.
5.
Nagy
,
A.
,
Ko
,
W. L.
, and
Lindholm
,
U. S.
,
1974
, “
Mechanical Behavior of Foamed Materials Under Dynamic Compression
,”
J. Cell Plast.
,
10
, pp.
127
134
.
6.
Monk, M. W., and Sullivan, L. K., 1986, “Energy Absorption Material Selection Methodology for Head/A-pillar,” in Proceedings of the 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 861887, pp. 185–198.
7.
Rossio, R. C., Vecchio, M., and Abramczyk, J., 1993, “Polyurethane Energy Absorbing Foams for Automotive Applications,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 930433.
8.
Sounik, D. F., McCullough, D. W., Clemons, J. L., and Liddle, J. L., 1994, “Dynamic Impact Testing of Polyurethane Energy Absorbing (EA) Foams,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 940879.
9.
Chou, C. C., Zhao, Y., Lim, G. G., Patel, R. N., Shahab, S. A., and Patel, P. J., 1995, “Comparative Analysis of Different Energy Absorbing Materials for Interior Head Impact,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 950332.
10.
Faruque, O., Liu, N., and Chou, C. C., 1997, “Strain Rate Dependent Foam-Constitutive Modeling and Applications,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 971076.
11.
Ullrich, J., Emanuel, D., Fong, W., Nusholtz, G., Chaudhry, M., and Williams, S., 1997, “Comparison of Energy Management Materials for Head Impact Protection,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 970159.
12.
Yu, L. C., Kowalski, E. L., and Elchison, B. K., 1997, “Material Comparison using Free Motion Headform (FMH) Impact and Alternative Test Method,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 970165.
13.
Holbourn
,
A. H. S.
,
1943
, “
Mechanics of Head Injuries
,”
Lancet
,
2
, pp.
438
441
.
14.
Hodgson, V. R., and Thomas, L. M., 1979, “Acceleration Induced Shear Strains in a Monkey Brain Hemisection,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 791023, pp. 589–611.
15.
Lo¨wenhielm
,
P.
,
1975
, “
Mathematical Simulation of Gliding Contusions
,”
J. Biomech.
,
8
(
6
), pp.
351
356
.
16.
Margulies
,
S. S.
, and
Thibault
,
L. E.
,
1989
, “
An Analytical Model of Traumatic Diffuse Brain Injury
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
111
(
3
), pp.
241
249
.
17.
Viano, D. C., Melvin, J. W., McCleary, J. D., Madeira, R. G., Shee, T. R., and Horsch, J. D., 1986, “Measurement of Head Dynamics and Facial Contact Forces in the Hybrid III dummy,” in Proceedings of the 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 861891, pp. 269–289.
18.
Shea
,
R. T.
, and
Viano
,
D. C.
,
1994
, “
Computing Body Segment Trajectories in the Hybrid III Dummy using Linear Accelerometer Data
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
116
(
1
), pp.
37
43
.
19.
Amori, R. T., Armitage, R. R., Chou, C. C., Lim, G. G., Patel, R. N., and Shahab, S. A., 1995, “Influence of System Variables on Interior Head Impact Testing,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper No. 950882.
You do not currently have access to this content.