Research Papers

A Stepped-Bar Apparatus for Thermal Resistance Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Sameer R. Rao

George W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Baratunde A. Cola

George W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332;
School of Materials Science Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received March 15, 2013; final manuscript received June 24, 2013; published online August 13, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Mehmet Arik.

J. Electron. Packag 135(4), 041002 (Aug 13, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: EP-13-1019; doi: 10.1115/1.4025116 History: Received March 15, 2013; Revised June 24, 2013

A stepped-bar apparatus has been designed and constructed to characterize the thermal resistance of materials using steady-state heat transfer techniques. The design of the apparatus is a modification of the ASTM D5470 standard where reference bars of equal cross-sectional area are used to extrapolate surface temperatures and heat flux across a sample of unknown thermal resistance. The design modification involves intentionally oversizing the upper reference bar (URB) of the apparatus to avoid contact area uncertainty due to reference bar misalignment, which is difficult to account for, as well as the high cost that can be associated with equipping the apparatus with precise alignment controls (e.g., pneumatic alignment). Multidimensional heat transfer in the upper reference bar near the sample interface is anticipated using numerical modeling. The resulting nonlinear temperature profile in the upper reference bar is accounted for by fitting a second order regression line through thermocouple readings near the sample interface. The thermal resistances of commercially available thermal gap pads and thermal pastes were measured with the stepped-bar apparatus; the measured values were in good agreement with published results, and exhibited a high degree of reproducibility. The measurement uncertainty of both the standard and stepped-bar apparatus decrease with increased thermocouple precision. Notably, the uncertainty due to reference bar misalignment with the standard apparatus becomes more pronounced as thermocouple precision and the number of thermocouples increases, which suggests that the stepped-bar apparatus would be especially advantageous for enabling accurate, high-precision measurements of very low thermal resistances.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Cola, B. A., Xu, J., and Fisher, T. S., 2009, “Contact Mechanics and Thermal Conductance of Carbon Nanotube Array Thermal Interfaces,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 3490–3503. [CrossRef]
Harris, D. K., Palkar, A., and Wonacott, G., 2010, “An Experimental Investigation in the Performance of Water-Filled Silicon Microheat Pipe Arrays,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 132(2), p. 021005. [CrossRef]
Huang, H., Liu, C. H., Wu, Y., and Fan, S., 2005, “Aligned Carbon Nanotube Composite Films for Thermal Management,” Adv. Mater., 17(13), pp. 1652–1656. [CrossRef]
Narumanchi, S., Mihalic, M., and Kelly, K., 2008, “Thermal Interface Materials for Power Electronics Applications,” Itherm 2008, Orlando, FL, May 28–31, Paper No. NREL/CP-540-42972.
Xu, J., and Fisher, T. S., 2005, “Enhancement of Thermal Interface Materials With Carbon Nanotube Arrays,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 49, pp. 1658–1666. [CrossRef]
Gwinn, J. P., and Webb, R. L., 2003, “Performance and Testing of Thermal Interface Materials,” Microelectron. J., 34(3), pp. 215–222. [CrossRef]
Khandelwal, M., and Mench, M. M., 2006, “Direct Measurement of Through-Plane Thermal Conductivity and Contact Resistance in Fuel Cell Materials,” J. Power Sources, 161, pp. 1106–1115. [CrossRef]
Liao, P., Hua, Z. K., Liao, Y. C., and Zhang, J. H., 2010, “A Novel Thermal Conductivity Meter for Thermal Interface Materials in Optoelectronic Device,” 11th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology and High Density Packaging (ICEPT-HDP), Xi'an, China, August 16–19, pp. 889–892. [CrossRef]
ATSM, 2006, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmission Properties of Thermally Conductive Electrical Insulating Materials,” D5470, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Savija, I., Culham, J. R., and Yovanovich, M. M., “Effective Thermophysical Properties of Thermal Interface Materials: Part I—Definitions and Models,” Proceedings of ASME International Electronic Packaging Technical Conference and Exhibition, Maui, HI, July 6–11, ASME Paper No. IPACK2003-35088, pp. 189–200. [CrossRef]
Savija, I., Culham, J. R., and Yovanovich, M. M., “Effective Thermophysical Properties of Thermal Interface Materials: Part II—Experiments and Data,” Proceedings of International Electronic Packaging Technical Conference and Exhibition, Maui, HI, July 6–11, ASME Paper No. IPACK2003-35264, pp. 567–573. [CrossRef]
Kearns, D., 2003, “Improving Accuracy and Flexibility of ASTM D 5470 for High Performance Thermal Interface Materials,” 19th IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium, San Jose, CA, March 11–13, pp. 129–133. [CrossRef]
Kempers, R., Kolodner, P., Lyons, A., and Robinson, A. J., 2009, “A High-Precision Apparatus for the Characterization of Thermal Interface Materials,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 80, p. 095111. [CrossRef]
ASTM, 2004, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Conductivity of Solids by Means of the Guarded-Comparative-Longitudinal Heat Flow Technique,” E1225, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Stockwell Elastomerics, 2012, “Thermally Conductive Silicon Rubber Heat Transfer Pads and Gaskets From Gap Filling Compounds,” Stockwell Elastomerics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, http://www.stockwell.com/data_sheets/thermal/se200_thermal_mgmt_products.pdf
ASTM, 2011, “Standard Specification and Temperature-Electromotive Force (emf) Tables for Standardized Thermocouples,” E230/E230M-11, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Hot Disk, 2012, “TPS 1500,” Hot Disk AB, Gothenburg, Sweden, http://www.hotdiskinstruments.com/products/instruments/tps-1500.html
Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, “Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments,” Mech. Eng., 75(1), pp. 3–8.
GrafTech, 2012, “HITHERM Thermal Interface Materials Technical Data Sheet 318,” GraphTech International, Parma, OH, http://graftechaet.com/getattachment/a98eb932-9a95-419f-82e5-9d7683b6b67b/eGRAF%C2%AE-HITHERM%E2%84%A2-Typical-Properties.aspx
Bowker, A. L., and Lieberman, G. J., 1972, Engineering Statistics, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Culham, J. R., Teertstra, P., Savija, I., and Yovanovich, M. M., 2002, “Design, Assembly and Commissioning of a Test Apparatus for Characterizing Thermal Interface Materials,” Eighth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITHERM 2002), San Diego, CA, June 1, pp. 128–135. [CrossRef]
Hunan Zhenhua Analysis Instrument Co., 2013, “DRX-I-PB/PC Thermal Conductivity Tester (Guarded Hot Plate Testing System),” http://hfyq.en.alibaba.com/product/553015923-209348254/DRX_I_PB_PC_Thermal_Conductivity_Tester_Guarded_hot_plate_testing_system_.html


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Schematic of model geometry used in 2D heat transfer model. Constant temperature boundary conditions at top of URB and bottom of URB. Zero heat flux boundary conditions on all sides of stepped-bar apparatus. Simulated temperatures in URB recorded along dotted line. (b) Simulated center-line (see dotted line in Fig. 1(a)) temperature profile in URB of stepped-bar apparatus.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stepped-bar thermal measurement apparatus. (a) Photograph of apparatus with screw press in place. (b) Schematic of apparatus (Two 0.5 in. thick aluminum base plates (a, b), each measuring 12 in. × 12 in. Four vertical steel rods (c) of 0.5 in. outer diameter. Bottom base plate mounted on rubber feet (d) to provide extra stability. Third plate (e) mounted in between base plates using Rulon sleeve bearings and the steel rods as guide rails. Assembly connected to mechanical transducer (f) comprised of 3/8 in.–12 size acme threaded rod, acme nut and a steel hand wheel. Load cell (g) of maximum load 500 N positioned between free plate and thermal test sections (h, i) to monitor the pressure being applied to the sample. Cartridge heater (150 W 120 V) embedded in a block (j) of oxygen free high conductivity copper (OHFC) and connected to a constant temperature PID controller to maintain the set point and the heat rate through the system. OFHC block (k) machined to allow coolant (water) to flow through it. Blocks j and k serve as the high and low temperature reservoirs, respectively). (c) Annotated drawing of URB with thermocouple positions (dimensions in mm). (d) Annotated drawing of LRB with thermocouple positions (dimensions in mm).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Curve-fitting procedure in upper reference bar of modified apparatus. The slope of the blue dashed line is used to determine the input heat rate. The red dashed-dot curve is used to extrapolate the interface temperature.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cross-sectional view of the custom insulation system surrounding the reference bars. Fiberglass insulation is added to each surface of the nylon foam halves (not seen in the photo). The photo also shows the thermocouples in their measurement positions in each reference bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Measured thermal resistance of commercially available thermal paste. The dashed orange and blue lines estimate the lower bounds of the measured thermal resistances for Ceramique and Arctic Silver 5, which occur at high pressures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Frequency histogram of 18 independent thermal resistance measurements (red) of TC100 thermal interface material. The sample was removed and reloaded in the system after each measurement. Manufacturer-specified thermal resistance of TC100 sample was 12.12 cm2 K/W. The dotted red line indicates the average value of the thermal resistance measurements. Also shown is the upper set point temperature (blue shaded region) used in each measurement.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Top-view of lateral and rotational misalignment of upper reference bar. (b) Top-view of 1D misalignment of upper reference bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of measurement uncertainty for standard and stepped-bar apparatus with Al 2024 meter bars and a graphite pad TIM. Solid lines and dotted lines represent measurement uncertainties when 0.5 K and 0.001 K temperature probes are used, respectively. ASTM D-5470-06 and conventional reference bar curves overlap for high-precision (0.001 K) thermal probes.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In