Research Papers

Current Crowding and its Effects on Electromigration and Interfacial Reaction in Lead-Free Solder Joints

[+] Author and Article Information
Hao Lu

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R.C.shweld@sjtu.edu.cn

Chun Yu, Peilin Li, Junmei Chen

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R.C.

J. Electron. Packag 130(3), 031008 (Aug 01, 2008) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2957322 History: Received June 04, 2007; Revised December 03, 2007; Published August 01, 2008

The current density distribution in a line-to-bump structure as a function of cross-sectional area ratio of the electrical conductor was investigated, as well as the effects of current crowding on electromigration and interfacial reaction in lead-free solder joints. Finite element analysis shows that the crowding factor is directly proportional to the cross-sectional area ratio between Cu line and contact opening at the cathode side. CuSn3.0Ag0.5CuCu solder joints with Cu line in different widths were designed and tested under 1×103Acm2 at 60°C for 430h. The experiment results show that big voids induced by electromigration are only formed at the structure with a narrower line. Moreover, the growth of intermetallic compound layers, as well as dissolution of Cu at the cathode side, is accelerated by smaller current crowding, whereas impeded by a bigger one.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Sketch of the Cu∕Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu∕Cu sandwich structure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) 3D finite element model showing the meshes and (b) the tilt view of the current density distribution in the solder joint. Linewidth is 100μm.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Cross-sectional distributions of the current density, (a) for Cu line width of 300μm and (b) for Cu line width of 100μm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Relationship of the crowding factor and area ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Microstructure of the interface under EM test on the cathode side. The average current density is 1×103A∕cm2 and temperature is 60°C for 430h. (a) Linewidth of 300μm; (b) linewidth of 100μm.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Diffusion model at the cathode side

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Cross-sectional morphology of the Cu∕Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu∕Cu joint



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In