This paper describes a technique for determining the dynamic aerodynamic yaw moment derivative based on the time response data using an oscillating model rig. The aerodynamic yaw moment derivatives are initially estimated using oscillation frequency and amplitude decay. The results from the dynamic measurement are compared with conventional static test and presented in the form of aerodynamic magnification. The yaw moment derivative exceeds that determined statically across reduced frequency range measured. The yaw damping derivative was found to be a function of freestream speed; at low velocities it is negative but progressively increases to a positive value. With further increases in speed, a self-sustained oscillation is observed with almost constant frequency and amplitude. This result is attributed to coupling between the model wake and the model stability; however, the exact behavior of the interaction is not fully understood; this phenomenon is under further investigation.

1.
Hucho
,
W. H.
, and
Emmelmann
,
H. J.
, 1973, “
Theoretical Prediction of the Aerodynamic Derivatives of a Vehicle in Cross Wind Gusts
,” SAE Paper No. 730232.
2.
Bearman
,
P. W.
, and
Mullarkey
,
S. P.
, 1994, “
Aerodynamic Forces on Road Vehicles Due To Steady Side Winds and Gusts
,”
RAeS, Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference
, Loughborough, UK.
3.
Passmore
,
M. A.
,
Richardson
,
S.
, and
Imam
,
A.
, 2001, “
An Experimental Study of Unsteady Vehicle Aerodynamics
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.)
0954-4070,
215
(
7
), pp.
779
788
.
4.
Garry
,
K. P.
, and
Cooper
,
K. R.
, 1986, “
Comparison of Quasi-Static and Dynamic Wind Tunnel Measurements of Simplified Tractor-Trailer Models
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
22
, pp.
185
194
.
5.
Macklin
,
A. R.
,
Garry
,
K. P.
, and
Howell
,
J. P.
, 1996, “
Comparing Static and Dynamic Testing Techniques for the Crosswind Sensitivity of Road Vehicles
,” SAE Paper No. 960674.
6.
Chadwick
,
A.
,
Garry
,
K. P.
, and
Howell
,
J.
, 2000, “
Transient Aerodynamic Characteristics of Simple Vehicle Shapes by the Measurement of Surface Pressure
,” Vehicle Aerodynamics SAE Paper No. SP-1524, 2000-01-0876.
7.
Chometon
,
F.
,
Strzelecki
,
A.
,
Ferrand
,
V.
,
Dechipre
,
H.
,
Dufour
,
P. C.
,
Gohlke
,
M.
, and
Herbert
,
V.
, 2005, “
Experimental Study of Unsteady Wakes Behind an Oscillating Car Model
,” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-0604, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
8.
Ryan
,
A.
, and
Dominy
,
R. G.
, 1998, “
The Aerodynamic Forces Induced on Passenger Vehicle in Response to a Transient Cross-Wind Gust at a Relative Incidence of 30°
,” Developments in Vehicle Aerodynamics, SAE Paper No. SP-1381, 980392.
9.
Goetz
,
H.
, 1995, “
Crosswind Facilities and Procedures
,” SAE Paper No. SP-1109, Warrendale, PA.
10.
Watkins
,
S.
, and
Sounders
,
J. W.
, 1995, “
Turbulence Experienced by Road Vehicles Under Normal Driving Conditions
,” SAE Paper No. 950997.
11.
Cooper
,
K. R.
, 1996, “
Closed-Test-Section Wind Tunnel Blockage Corrections for Road Vehicles
,” SAE Paper No. SP-1176.
12.
Russell
,
J. B.
, 1969, “
Aerodynamic Effects on the Lateral Control and Stability of Motor Vehicles
,”
First Symposium on Road Vehicle Aerodynamics
,
City University
,
London
, Nov.
You do not currently have access to this content.