Rarefaction wave gun (RAVEN) propulsion has renewed interest in the fundamental limits of recoil reductions attainable by redirecting propellant gases rearward from a gun without compromising the projectile propulsion. Compared with a conventional gun there is a great difference in the launch process and launch structure. This paper is concerned with an analysis of the dynamic characteristics of this high performance weapon system by numerical simulation. Based on its launch mechanism and launch structure, the vibration equation describing the vibration characteristics of RAVEN was established by vibration theory, which considered the actual movement of the projectile and inertial breech by coupling the interior ballistic equations of the rarefaction wave gun. A rigid-flexible dynamic model, which considered the coupling effect between the elastic vibration of the launch barrel and the dynamic behaviors of the other parts of the RAVEN, is established via a subsystem method. The vibration response of RAVEN during the launch is analyzed by numerical simulation. Comparisons are presented based on the conventional gun, as well as the rules of how the different parameters affect the vibration response. During the launching of RAVEN, the launch barrel shows significant vibration due to the effect of the propellant gases, the inertial breech, and the projectile, and there is some reduction in the vibration amplitude compared with that observed in a conventional closed chamber gun. The vibration amplitude and duration of the launch barrel, which increased with a decrease in the loading density, an increase in the mass of the inertial breech and projectile, and a delay of the venting time, is affected in a more significant manner by changes in loading density and the mass of projectile. The coupled effect between the launch barrel and the other parts of RAVEN are most prevalent in the z-direction. The vibration amplitude along the z-direction is higher than that of the y-direction. When the coupled effect is considered, the transverse vibration response of the flexible barrel has some reduction compared with the one that does not exhibit the coupling effect.

1.
Kathe
E.
, 2002, “
Sonic Rarefaction Wave Recoilless Gun System
,” U.S. Patent No. 646,044,6B1.
2.
Ying-ze
,
W.
,
Xiaobing
,
Z.
, and
Yaxiong
,
Y.
, 2009, “
Principle Analysis and Model Research of New Low Recoil Rarefaction Wave Gun
,”
Fire Control and Command Control
,
34
(
1
), pp.
30
34
.
3.
Xifu
,
G.
, 1988,
Launch Dynamics of Projectile
(
Chinese Monograph
),
East China Institute of Technology
,
Nanjing, China
, Chap. 1.
4.
Langhaar
,
H. L.
,
Miller
,
R. E.
, and
Boresi
,
A. P.
, 1978, “
Excitation of a Gun Barrel Due to Firing
,”
Proceedings of the Second US Army Symposium on Gun Dynamics
, Rensselaerville, NY, Pt. I, pp.
34
57
.
5.
Chu
,
S. H.
, 1980,
Bore Motion Analysis of XM712 Projectile in the M198 Gun
,
Dover
,
New York
.
6.
Xinzhong
,
K.
, and
Baoyuan
,
W.
, 1990, “
Finite Element Analysis of Barrel Vibrations
,”
Acta Armamentarri
1000-1093,
11
(
2
), pp.
16
22
.
7.
Wenrun
,
L.
, and
Deshi
,
W.
, 2001, “
Transverse Vibration Analysis of Gun Barrels
,”
Journal Nonlinear Dynamics in Science and Technology
,
8
(
3
), pp.
239
244
.
8.
Guangyao
,
O. Y.
,
Shuzong
,
W.
, and
Deshi
,
W.
, 1999, “
Investigation of Barrel Vibration and Reducing Vibration
,”
Journal of the Naval Academy of Engineering
,
2
, pp.
79
86
.
9.
Mu
J.
, and
Xifu
G.
, 2002, “
On the Vibration of Tube Due to Accelerate Moving Projectile
,”
Journal of Ballistics
,
3
, pp.
57
63
.
10.
Hailong
Y.
,
Xiaoting
R.
, and
Bin
H.
, etc, 2006, “
Finite Element Transfer Matrix Method of Gun Tube Natural Vibration Characteristic
,”
Journal of Ballistics
,
14
(
3
), pp.
62
64
.
11.
Kane
,
T. R.
, 1983, “
Multi-Body Dynamics
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
50
(
4
), pp.
1071
1078
.
12.
Huston
,
R. L.
, 1987, “
Kane’s Equations With Undetermined Multipliers—Application on Constrained Multi-Body Systems
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
54
(
2
), pp.
424
429
.
13.
Boresi
,
A. P.
, and
Langhaar
,
H. L.
, 1983,
Dynamics of Rigid Guns With Straight Tubes
,
US Army Armament Research and Development Command
,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
.
14.
Philip
,
D.
, and
Benzkofer
,
M. R.
, 1985, “
Automated Dynamic Analysis of Weapon Systems
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth US Army Symposium on Gun Dynamics
, Riviera Beach, FL, Pt. II, pp.
89
108
.
15.
Yong
,
H.
, and
Shuzhi
,
G.
, 1995, “
A Multi-Body Method With Flexible Gun Tube for Gun Dynamics
,”
Journal of North China Institute of Technology
,
16
(
4
), pp.
302
307
.
16.
Yunsheng
,
C.
, and
Guolai
,
Y.
, 1996, “
Modeling Study of Kane’s Method for the Self Propelled Artillery
,”
Journal of Gun Launch & Control
,
1
, pp.
1
5
.
17.
Guolai
Y.
,
Junrong
Y.
, and
Yunsheng
,
C.
, 2004, “
Study on the Effects of Dynamic Parameters for an Automatic Mortar
,”
Journal of Ballistics
,
16
(
1
), pp.
19
23
.
18.
Ming
,
W. Q.
, and
Liang
,
M. W.
, 2004, “
Modeling and Simulation of Dynamics for the Self Propelled Artillery Running the Road
,”
Acta Armamentarri
1000-1093,
25
(
5
), pp.
520
524
.
19.
Yong
F.
,
Da-wei
M.
, and
Chang
X.
, etc., 2006, “
Simulation Studies of Coupled Rigid and Flexible Multi-Body Dynamics for Multiple Launch Rocket Systems
,”
Acta Armamentarri
1000-1093,
27
(
3
), pp.
545
548
.
20.
Zhang
,
D. -g.
, and
Xiao
,
J. -q.
, 2005, “
A Dynamic Model for Rocket Launcher With Coupled Rigid and Flexible Motion
,”
Appl. Math. Mech.
0253-4827,
26
(
5
), pp.
609
617
.
21.
Yanzhu
,
L.
,
Jiazheng
,
H.
, and
Haixing
,
Y.
, 1989,
Dynamics of System of Rigid Bodies
,
Higher Education Press
,
Beijing
, Chap. 4.
You do not currently have access to this content.