Since the pioneering discussion by Irwin, a significant effort has been devoted to determining stress intensity factors (K) using experimental methods. Techniques have been developed to determine stress intensity factors from photoelastic, strain gage, caustics, and moire´ data. All of these methods apply to a relatively long single-ended-edge crack. To date, the determination of K for internal cracks that are double-ended by experimental methods has not been addressed. This paper describes a photoelastic study of tension panels with both central and eccentric internal cracks. The data recorded in the experiments was analyzed using a new series solution for the opening-mode stress intensity factor for an internal crack. The data was also analyzed using the edge-crack series solution, which is currently employed in experimental studies. Results indicated that the experimental methods usually provided results accurate to within three to five percent if the series solution for the internal crack was employed in an overdeterministic numerical analysis of the data. Comparison of experimental results using the new series for the internal crack and the series for an edge crack showed the superiority of the new series.

1.
Irwin, G. R., 1958, discussion of paper by Wells and Post, Proc. SESA, Vol. XVI, pp. 93–96.
2.
Wells, A., and Post, D., 1958, “The Dynamic Stress Distribution Surrounding a Running Crack—A Photoelastic Analysis,” Proc. SESA, Vol. XVI, pp. 69–93.
3.
Schroedl, M. A., and Smith, C. W., 1973, “Local Stresses Near Deep Surface Flaws Under Cylindrical Bending Fields,” Progress in Flow Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing, ASTM STP 536, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 45–63.
4.
Bradley
,
W. B.
, and
Kobayashi
,
A. S.
,
1970
, “
An Investigation of Propagating Cracks by Dynamic Photoelasticity
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
10
, No.
3
, pp.
106
113
.
5.
Chisholm
,
D. B.
, and
Jones
,
D. L.
,
1977
, “
An Analytical and Experimental Stress Analysis of a Practical Mode II Fracture Test Specimen
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
17
, No.
1
, pp.
7
13
.
6.
Smith
,
D. G.
, and
Smith
,
C. W.
,
1972
, “
Photoelastic Determination of Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factors
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
4
, No.
2
, pp.
357
366
.
7.
Gdoutus
,
E. E.
, and
Theocaris
,
P. G.
,
1978
, “
A Photoelastic Determination of Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factors
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
18
, No.
3
, pp.
87
97
.
8.
Etheridge
,
J. M.
, and
Dally
,
J. W.
,
1978
, “
A Three Parameter Method for Determining Stress Intensity Factors From Isochromatic Fringe Loops
,”
J. Strain Anal.
,
13
, No.
2
, pp.
91
94
.
9.
Sanford
,
R. J.
, and
Dally
,
J. W.
,
1979
, “
A General Method for Determining Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factors From Isochromatic Fringe Patterns
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
11
, pp.
621
633
.
10.
Berger
,
J. R.
, and
Dally
,
J. W.
,
1988
, “
An Overdeterministic Approach for Measuring K1 Using Strain Gages
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
28
, No.
2
, pp.
142
145
.
11.
Barker
,
D. B.
,
Sanford
,
R. J.
, and
Chona
,
R.
,
1985
, “
Determining K and Related Stress Field Parameters From Displacement Fields
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
25
, No.
12
, pp.
399
407
.
12.
Kalthoff, J. F., 1987, “Shadow Method of Caustics,” in Handbook on Experimental Mechanics, A. S. Kobayashi, ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 430–500.
13.
Rosakis
,
A. J.
, and
Ravi-Chandar
,
K.
,
1986
, “
On the Crack-Tip Stress State: An Experimental Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Effects
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
22
, No.
2
, pp.
121
134
.
14.
Sanford, R. J., and Drude, B. T., 1993, Proc. 1993 Conf. on Exp. Mechanics, SEM Bethel, CT.
15.
Isida
,
M.
,
1966
, “
Stress Intensity Factors for the Tension of an Eccentrically Cracked Strip
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
33
, pp.
674
675
.
16.
Sanford
,
R. J.
,
1979
, “
A Critical Re-examination of the Westergaard Method for Solving Opening-Mode Crack Problems
,”
Mech. Res. Commun.
,
6
, No.
5
, pp.
289
294
.
17.
Sanford
,
R. J.
,
1989
, “
Determining Fracture Parameters With Full-Field Optical Methods
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
29
, No.
3
, pp.
241
247
.
18.
Chona, R., Irwin, G. R., and Sanford, R. J., 1983, “Influence of Specimen Size and Shape on the Singularity Dominated Zone,” Fracture Mechanics: Fourteenth Symposium —Volume: I Theory and Analysis, ASTM STP 791, J. C. Lewis and G. Sines, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 13–23.
You do not currently have access to this content.