Search Results | IPC | ASME Digital Collection

1-20 of 23

Sort by

Sort Order Select

Proceedings Papers

Quantifying Risk to Optimize Facility Integrity Management

Alex Nemeth, Lily Li, Andrew Nielsen, Geoff Vignal

Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern, Offshore, and Production Pipelines, V002T07A009, September 28–30, 2020

Paper No: IPC2020-9459

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9459

View Paper

Topics: Cost benefit analysis, Optimization, Risk, Safety

Proceedings Papers

Buried Pipe Span Ovality Assessment

Ryan Phillips, Michael Martens, Rodney McAffee, Lesley Tan, John Barrett

Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A079, September 24–28, 2018

Paper No: IPC2018-78771

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78771

View Paper

Topics: Pipes, Soil, Transients (Dynamics), Compacting, Cost benefit analysis, Cushioning materials, Finite element analysis, Inspection, Pressure, Stress

Proceedings Papers

Use of Risk and Engineering Assessments to Improve Safety in Class Location Changes: South American Case Study

John Erick Malpartida Moya

Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A013, September 24–28, 2018

Paper No: IPC2018-78302

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78302

View Paper

Topics: Risk, Safety, Pipelines, Design, Maintenance, Pressure, Regulations, Wall thickness, ASME Standards, Construction

Proceedings Papers

Practical IMP Performance Metrics

Jeremiah P. Konell, Jack Van Schenck, Joseph P. Bratton, Steven J. Polasik

Proc. ASME. IPC2016, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T01A018, September 26–30, 2016

Paper No: IPC2016-64528

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2016-64528

View Paper

Topics: Cost benefit analysis, Hazardous substances, Maintenance, Nonprofit organizations, Pipelines, Quality control, Risk, Safety, Transparency, Workshops (Work spaces)

Proceedings Papers

Factors of Safety for Design and Requalification of Pipelines and Risers in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico

Burbano B. N. Rommel, Lara M. Leonel

Proc. ASME. IPC2000, Volume 2: Integrity and Corrosion; Offshore Issues; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Rotating Equipment, V002T07A001, October 1–5, 2000

Paper No: IPC2000-226

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2000-226

View Paper

Topics: Design, Pipeline risers, Pipelines, Risers (Casting), Safety, Maintainability, Stress, Cost benefit analysis, Durability, Risk assessment

Proceedings Papers

Pipeline Reliability Evaluation and Design Using the Sustainable Capacity Methodology

W. S. Chmilar

Proc. ASME. IPC1996, Volume 2: Design, Construction, and Operation Innovations; Compression and Pump Technology; SCADA, Automation, and Measurement; System Simulation; Geotechnical and Environmental, 803-810, June 9–13, 1996

Paper No: IPC1996-1886

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC1996-1886

View Paper

Topics: Design, Pipelines, Reliability, Sustainability, Stress, Cost benefit analysis, Electricity (Physics), Maintenance, Piping design, Time series

Proceedings Papers

Putting the Environment Into the NPV Calculation: Quantifying Pipeline Environmental Costs

Dawn R. Dott, S. C. Wirasinghe, Amit Chakma

Paper No: IPC1996-1941

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC1996-1941

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Valuation, Compressors, Construction, Cost benefit analysis, Economic analysis, Noise (Sound), Preferences, Risk, Rivers

Proceedings Papers

Development and Implementation of a Liquid Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment Model

Jerico Perez, David Weir, Caroline Seguin, Refaul Ferdous

Proc. ASME. IPC2014, Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Risk and Reliability, V003T12A029, September 29–October 3, 2014

Paper No: IPC2014-33705

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33705

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Risk assessment, Risk, Failure, Pipeline systems, Risk reduction, Algorithms, Cost benefit analysis, Pipes, Risk control

Proceedings Papers

Development and Prioritization Portfolio of Natural-Gas Compression-Station Projects

Lívia Matheus Candian, Leandro da Rosa Alves, Ana Gabriela Portela Amorim, Flavio Dupim Pires

Proc. ASME. IPC2014, Volume 4: Production Pipelines and Flowlines; Project Management; Facilities Integrity Management; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern and Offshore Environments; Strain-Based Design; Standards and Regulations, V004T02A003, September 29–October 3, 2014

Paper No: IPC2014-33433

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33433

View Paper

Topics: Compression, Natural gas, Maintenance, Cost benefit analysis, Decision making, Design

Proceedings Papers

An Engineering Assessment to Evaluate Integrity Options for Out of Class Pipelines

Hong Wang, Shahani Kariyawasam, Pauline Kwong

Proc. ASME. IPC2014, Volume 2: Pipeline Integrity Management, V002T06A015, September 29–October 3, 2014

Paper No: IPC2014-33549

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33549

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Pipes, Pressure, Hazards, Regulations, Safety, Cities, Construction, Cost benefit analysis, Design

Proceedings Papers

Extreme Testing: Assessing CPM Leak Detection Systems on a Northern Oil Pipeline

Paul Vinh, Lichun Zhang, Rick Barlow

Proc. ASME. IPC2012, Volume 1: Upstream Pipelines; Project Management; Design and Construction; Environment; Facilities Integrity Management; Operations and Maintenance; Pipeline Automation and Measurement, 765-772, September 24–28, 2012

Paper No: IPC2012-90258

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90258

View Paper

Topics: Leakage, Pipelines, Testing, Design, Instrumentation, American Petroleum Institute, Fluids, Pipeline integrity, Appropriate technology, Cost benefit analysis

Proceedings Papers

Implications of Reduced Heating of Heavy Crude Pipeline on Pump Lubrication Systems

Byron G. Lopez

Paper No: IPC2012-90315

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90315

View Paper

Topics: Crude oil, Heating, Industrial lubrication systems, Pipelines, Pumps, American Petroleum Institute, Fuel oils, Viscosity, Cooling, Cost benefit analysis

Proceedings Papers

Using Quantitative Risk Assessment to Justify Location Class Changes: Case Study

Paul Rumney, Graham Goodfellow

Proc. ASME. IPC2012, Volume 4: Pipelining in Northern and Offshore Environments; Strain-Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Standards and Regulations, 569-577, September 24–28, 2012

Paper No: IPC2012-90280

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90280

View Paper

Topics: Risk assessment, Pipelines, Risk, Design, Construction, Cost benefit analysis, High pressure (Physics), Maintenance, Pressure, Stress

Proceedings Papers

A Decision Making Methodology for Cost Effectively Managing Pipeline Risk

Chris Blackwell, Edgar Ivan Cote, Colin Gagne

Proc. ASME. IPC2012, Volume 4: Pipelining in Northern and Offshore Environments; Strain-Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Standards and Regulations, 645-656, September 24–28, 2012

Paper No: IPC2012-90430

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90430

View Paper

Topics: Decision making, Pipelines, Risk, Maintenance, Risk management, Damage, Failure, Pressure, Cost benefit analysis, Inspection

Proceedings Papers

Reliability Modelling: Petrobras 2010 Integrated Gas Supply Chain

Denise Faertes, Leonardo Saker, Luciana Heil, Flavia Vieira, Francisco Risi, Joaquim Domingues, Tobias Alvarenga, Patricia Mussel, Eduardo Carvalho

Proc. ASME. IPC2010, 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 4, 497-505, September 27–October 1, 2010

Paper No: IPC2010-31309

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31309

View Paper

Topics: Modeling, Reliability, Supply chains, Computer software, Pipelines, Design, Failure, Pressure, Compressors, Cost benefit analysis

Proceedings Papers

Petrobras Amazonia Gas Pipeline: Repair Logistics Evaluation Study

Denise Faertes, Joaquim Domingues

Proc. ASME. IPC2010, 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 3, 369-377, September 27–October 1, 2010

Paper No: IPC2010-31308

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31308

View Paper

Topics: Logistics, Maintenance, Pipelines, Failure, Transportation systems, Workshops (Work spaces), Army, Boats, Brain, Construction

Proceedings Papers

Probability of Exceedance (POE) Methodology for Developing Integrity Programs Based on Pipeline Operator-Specific Technical and Economic Factors

Rafael G. Mora, Curtis Parker, Patrick H. Vieth, Burke Delanty

Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 1793-1801, September 29–October 3, 2002

Paper No: IPC2002-27224

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27224

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Probability, Inspection, Maintenance, Corrosion, Pipeline systems, Decision making, Metals, Safety, Cost benefit analysis

Proceedings Papers

Pipeline Risk Mitigation Study

Anand Pillay

Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 769-779, September 29–October 3, 2002

Paper No: IPC2002-27090

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27090

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Risk mitigation, Vessels, Risk, Databases, Risk reduction, Shorelines, Traffic, Computers, Cost benefit analysis

Proceedings Papers

Guidelines to Develop Fitness-for-Service Assessments in Oil Pipelines Exposed to Corrosive and Geotechnical Environments

Rafael G. Mora, Carlos Vergara, Guy Krepps

Proc. ASME. IPC2004, 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 1397-1405, October 4–8, 2004

Paper No: IPC2004-0588

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0588

View Paper

Topics: Fitness-for-service, Pipelines, Corrosion, Inspection, Maintenance, Geometry, Pipes, Crude oil, Hazards, Modeling

Proceedings Papers

The Benefits of Consensus Standards: A Pipeline Case Study

Terry Boss, Andy Drake, Keith Leewis, Bernie Selig, John Zurcher

Proc. ASME. IPC2004, 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 2719-2724, October 4–8, 2004

Paper No: IPC2004-0166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0166

View Paper

Topics: Pipelines, Regulations, Safety, Cost benefit analysis, Industrial research

NARROW

Quantifying Risk to Optimize Facility Integrity Management

Buried Pipe Span Ovality Assessment

Use of Risk and Engineering Assessments to Improve Safety in Class Location Changes: South American Case Study

Practical IMP Performance Metrics

Factors of Safety for Design and Requalification of Pipelines and Risers in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico

Pipeline Reliability Evaluation and Design Using the Sustainable Capacity Methodology

Putting the Environment Into the NPV Calculation: Quantifying Pipeline Environmental Costs

Development and Implementation of a Liquid Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment Model

Development and Prioritization Portfolio of Natural-Gas Compression-Station Projects

An Engineering Assessment to Evaluate Integrity Options for Out of Class Pipelines

Extreme Testing: Assessing CPM Leak Detection Systems on a Northern Oil Pipeline

Implications of Reduced Heating of Heavy Crude Pipeline on Pump Lubrication Systems

Using Quantitative Risk Assessment to Justify Location Class Changes: Case Study

A Decision Making Methodology for Cost Effectively Managing Pipeline Risk

Reliability Modelling: Petrobras 2010 Integrated Gas Supply Chain

Petrobras Amazonia Gas Pipeline: Repair Logistics Evaluation Study

Probability of Exceedance (POE) Methodology for Developing Integrity Programs Based on Pipeline Operator-Specific Technical and Economic Factors

Pipeline Risk Mitigation Study

Guidelines to Develop Fitness-for-Service Assessments in Oil Pipelines Exposed to Corrosive and Geotechnical Environments

The Benefits of Consensus Standards: A Pipeline Case Study

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only