0
research-article

Knowledge based qualification process to evaluate vibration induced failures in Electronic Components

[+] Author and Article Information
Karumbu Meyyappan

Intel Corp., Portland, OR, USA
karumbu.meyyappan@intel.com

Milena Vujosevic

Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA USA
milena.vujosevic@intel.com

Qifeng Wu

Intel Corp., Portland, OR, USA
qifeng.wu@intel.com

Pramod Malatkar

Intel Corp., Chandler, AZ, USA
pramod.malatkar@intel.com

Charles Hill

Intel Corp., Chandler, AZ USA
charles.d.hill@intel.com

Ryan Parrott

Intel Corp., Chandler, AZ USA
ryan.parrott@intel.com

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4039301 History: Received September 16, 2017; Revised January 13, 2018

Abstract

This paper intends to address an important gap between reliability standards and the physics of how components respond to real use conditions using a knowledge based qualification (KBQ) process. Bridging the gap is essential to developing test methods that better reflect field performance. With the growth in importance of automotive market and the wide usage of electronics in this market, vibration induced failures was chosen for this study. MIL-STD-810G and ISTA4AB are couple of industry standards that address the risk of shipping finished goods to a customer. For automotive electronic products that are exposed to vibration conditions all through their life, USCAR-2 and GMW-3172 are more relevant. Even though the usage models and transportation duration for shipping fully packaged systems is different from automotive electronics, the source of energy (road conditions), driving the risks, are similar. The industry standards based damage models appear to be generic, covering a wide variety of products and failure modes. Whereas, the KBQ framework, used in this paper, maps use conditions to accelerated test requirements for only two failure modes: solder joint fatigue and socket contact fretting. The mechanisms were chosen to be distinct with different damage metric and drivers. The process is intended to explain how industry standards reflect field risks for two of the risks relevant for automotive electronics.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In